Performance evaluation and factors influencing a drinking water treatment plant, Shire Indassilassie, Ethiopia

Nguse Mekonen Mesfun , Sisay Demeku Derib
{"title":"Performance evaluation and factors influencing a drinking water treatment plant, Shire Indassilassie, Ethiopia","authors":"Nguse Mekonen Mesfun ,&nbsp;Sisay Demeku Derib","doi":"10.1016/j.wen.2024.08.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This research assesses the efficacy of the water treatment plant in Shire Indassilassie, Tigray, Ethiopia, focusing on the slow sand filtration system. Despite the inclusion of horizontal roughing filtration and a sedimentation tank, the water treatment plant struggles with an inadequate and turbid water supply. This study evaluates the water treatment plant’s performance through field evaluation, interviews, and laboratory experiments, concentrating on major treatment processes to identify performance-limiting factors. The water source had an average turbidity of 29.70 ± 1.03 NTU in the dry season and 94.27 ± 16.71 NTU in the summer. Results indicate that horizontal roughing filtration, sedimentation tank, and slow sand filtration achieve average turbidity removal efficiencies of 42.02% ± 4.00%, 5.67% ± 3.15%, and 83.51% ± 8.75%, respectively, during the dry season. In the summer or wet season, these treatment units achieve efficiencies of 40.06% ± 3.26%, 28.17% ± 4.62%, and 77.07% ± 4.61%, respectively. Additionally, the average run times for slow sand filtration are 22 days in the dry season and 13 days in the summer. Total and fecal coliform removals were effective, except in the sedimentation tank. A one-way ANOVA confirms a significant difference in turbidity among treatment units. Factors such as fine filter sand particles causing faster clogging, pipe misconnections, inadequate cleaning practices, irregular filtration rates, air binding due to a lack of backfilling at startup, and a lack of periodic monitoring and emergency response lead to suboptimal turbidity removal and shorter slow sand filtration run times. The study underscores the need for corrective measures to address these issues, enhancing water treatment plant sustainability in the region.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101279,"journal":{"name":"Water-Energy Nexus","volume":"7 ","pages":"Pages 235-242"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2588912524000146/pdfft?md5=d01a4f1de092fc4fc6e87d3c45fd7d79&pid=1-s2.0-S2588912524000146-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water-Energy Nexus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2588912524000146","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research assesses the efficacy of the water treatment plant in Shire Indassilassie, Tigray, Ethiopia, focusing on the slow sand filtration system. Despite the inclusion of horizontal roughing filtration and a sedimentation tank, the water treatment plant struggles with an inadequate and turbid water supply. This study evaluates the water treatment plant’s performance through field evaluation, interviews, and laboratory experiments, concentrating on major treatment processes to identify performance-limiting factors. The water source had an average turbidity of 29.70 ± 1.03 NTU in the dry season and 94.27 ± 16.71 NTU in the summer. Results indicate that horizontal roughing filtration, sedimentation tank, and slow sand filtration achieve average turbidity removal efficiencies of 42.02% ± 4.00%, 5.67% ± 3.15%, and 83.51% ± 8.75%, respectively, during the dry season. In the summer or wet season, these treatment units achieve efficiencies of 40.06% ± 3.26%, 28.17% ± 4.62%, and 77.07% ± 4.61%, respectively. Additionally, the average run times for slow sand filtration are 22 days in the dry season and 13 days in the summer. Total and fecal coliform removals were effective, except in the sedimentation tank. A one-way ANOVA confirms a significant difference in turbidity among treatment units. Factors such as fine filter sand particles causing faster clogging, pipe misconnections, inadequate cleaning practices, irregular filtration rates, air binding due to a lack of backfilling at startup, and a lack of periodic monitoring and emergency response lead to suboptimal turbidity removal and shorter slow sand filtration run times. The study underscores the need for corrective measures to address these issues, enhancing water treatment plant sustainability in the region.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
埃塞俄比亚 Shire Indassilassie 饮用水处理厂的性能评估和影响因素
本研究评估了埃塞俄比亚提格雷州 Shire Indassilassie 水处理厂的效能,重点是慢沙过滤系统。尽管加入了水平粗滤和沉淀池,但该水处理厂仍在供水不足和浑浊的问题上苦苦挣扎。本研究通过实地评估、访谈和实验室实验对该水处理厂的性能进行了评估,重点关注主要的处理过程,以确定限制性能的因素。水源的平均浊度在旱季为 29.70 ± 1.03 NTU,在夏季为 94.27 ± 16.71 NTU。结果表明,在旱季,水平粗滤、沉淀池和慢沙过滤的平均浊度去除率分别为 42.02% ± 4.00%、5.67% ± 3.15% 和 83.51% ± 8.75%。在夏季或雨季,这些处理装置的效率分别为 40.06% ± 3.26%、28.17% ± 4.62% 和 77.07% ± 4.61%。此外,慢沙过滤的平均运行时间为旱季 22 天,夏季 13 天。除沉淀池外,去除总大肠菌群和粪大肠菌群的效果良好。单因子方差分析证实,各处理单元的浊度差异显著。滤砂颗粒过细导致堵塞速度加快、管道连接错误、清洁方法不当、过滤速率不规则、启动时缺乏回填导致空气粘结以及缺乏定期监测和应急响应等因素导致浊度去除效果不理想,慢砂过滤运行时间较短。这项研究强调,需要采取纠正措施来解决这些问题,从而提高该地区水处理厂的可持续性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Concerns of growing carbon footprint of urban groundwater extraction in India: a case study of Faridabad, Haryana Applying geospatial technique for land suitability assessment for surface irrigation in Shinfa River Basin, Ethiopia Harnessing IoT and advanced analytics for sustainable water quality management A comprehensive analysis, hydrogeochemical characterization and processes controlling surface water quality: entropy-based WQI, geospatial assessment, PIS, NPI, and multivariate approaches in Mahanadi basin, Odisha (India)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1