Artificial Intelligence, Clinical Decision Support Algorithms, Mathematical Models, Calculators Applications in Infertility: Systematic Review and Hands-On Digital Applications

Carlo Bulletti MD , Jason M. Franasiak MD , Andrea Busnelli MD , Romualdo Sciorio BSc, Msc , Marco Berrettini PhD , Lusine Aghajanova MD, PhD , Francesco M. Bulletti MD , Baris Ata MD
{"title":"Artificial Intelligence, Clinical Decision Support Algorithms, Mathematical Models, Calculators Applications in Infertility: Systematic Review and Hands-On Digital Applications","authors":"Carlo Bulletti MD ,&nbsp;Jason M. Franasiak MD ,&nbsp;Andrea Busnelli MD ,&nbsp;Romualdo Sciorio BSc, Msc ,&nbsp;Marco Berrettini PhD ,&nbsp;Lusine Aghajanova MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Francesco M. Bulletti MD ,&nbsp;Baris Ata MD","doi":"10.1016/j.mcpdig.2024.08.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The aim of this systematic review was to identify clinical decision support algorithms (CDSAs) proposed for assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs) and to evaluate their effectiveness in improving ART cycles at every stage vs traditional methods, thereby providing an evidence-based guidance for their use in ART practice. A literature search on PubMed and Embase of articles published between 1 January 2013 and 31 January 2024 was performed to identify relevant articles. Prospective and retrospective studies in English on the use of CDSA for ART were included. Out of 1746 articles screened, 116 met the inclusion criteria. The selected articles were categorized into 3 areas: prognosis and patient counseling, clinical management, and embryo assessment. After screening, 11 CDSAs were identified as potentially valuable for clinical management and laboratory practices. Our findings highlight the potential of automated decision aids to improve in vitro fertilization outcomes. However, the main limitation of this review was the lack of standardization in validation methods across studies. Further validation and clinical trials are needed to establish the effectiveness of these tools in the clinical setting.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74127,"journal":{"name":"Mayo Clinic Proceedings. Digital health","volume":"2 4","pages":"Pages 518-532"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949761224000828/pdfft?md5=73ab3e5ee533ad8ca0f92b4e71a1331e&pid=1-s2.0-S2949761224000828-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mayo Clinic Proceedings. Digital health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949761224000828","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this systematic review was to identify clinical decision support algorithms (CDSAs) proposed for assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs) and to evaluate their effectiveness in improving ART cycles at every stage vs traditional methods, thereby providing an evidence-based guidance for their use in ART practice. A literature search on PubMed and Embase of articles published between 1 January 2013 and 31 January 2024 was performed to identify relevant articles. Prospective and retrospective studies in English on the use of CDSA for ART were included. Out of 1746 articles screened, 116 met the inclusion criteria. The selected articles were categorized into 3 areas: prognosis and patient counseling, clinical management, and embryo assessment. After screening, 11 CDSAs were identified as potentially valuable for clinical management and laboratory practices. Our findings highlight the potential of automated decision aids to improve in vitro fertilization outcomes. However, the main limitation of this review was the lack of standardization in validation methods across studies. Further validation and clinical trials are needed to establish the effectiveness of these tools in the clinical setting.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人工智能、临床决策支持算法、数学模型、计算器在不孕症中的应用:系统回顾和数字应用实践
本系统性综述旨在确定为辅助生殖技术(ART)提出的临床决策支持算法(CDSA),并评估其在改善 ART 周期各个阶段与传统方法的对比方面的有效性,从而为其在 ART 实践中的应用提供循证指导。我们在 PubMed 和 Embase 上对 2013 年 1 月 1 日至 2024 年 1 月 31 日期间发表的文章进行了文献检索,以确定相关文章。纳入了有关在抗逆转录病毒疗法中使用 CDSA 的前瞻性和回顾性英文研究。在筛选出的 1746 篇文章中,有 116 篇符合纳入标准。所选文章分为 3 个方面:预后和患者咨询、临床管理和胚胎评估。经过筛选,有 11 篇 CDSA 被认为对临床管理和实验室实践具有潜在价值。我们的研究结果凸显了自动决策辅助工具在改善体外受精结果方面的潜力。然而,本综述的主要局限性在于各研究的验证方法缺乏标准化。要确定这些工具在临床环境中的有效性,还需要进一步的验证和临床试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Mayo Clinic Proceedings. Digital health
Mayo Clinic Proceedings. Digital health Medicine and Dentistry (General), Health Informatics, Public Health and Health Policy
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
47 days
期刊最新文献
Developing a Research Center for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine Strategic Considerations for Selecting Artificial Intelligence Solutions for Institutional Integration: A Single-Center Experience Reviewers for Mayo Clinic Proceedings: Digital Health (2024) A Blueprint for Clinical-Driven Medical Device Development: The Feverkidstool Application to Identify Children With Serious Bacterial Infection Cost-Effectiveness of Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Electrocardiograms for Early Detection of Low Ejection Fraction: A Secondary Analysis of the Electrocardiogram Artificial Intelligence-Guided Screening for Low Ejection Fraction Trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1