Radiation Exposure and Protection for (Assumed) Pregnant Interventional Cardiologists and Electrophysiologists

Kenneth A. Fetterly PhD , Beth A. Schueler PhD , Jelena M. Mihailovic PhD , Jake H. Fiedler RRPT , Glenn M. Sturchio PhD , Allison Cabalka MD , Patricia J.M. Best MD , Rajiv Gulati MD, PhD , Mayra Guerrero MD
{"title":"Radiation Exposure and Protection for (Assumed) Pregnant Interventional Cardiologists and Electrophysiologists","authors":"Kenneth A. Fetterly PhD ,&nbsp;Beth A. Schueler PhD ,&nbsp;Jelena M. Mihailovic PhD ,&nbsp;Jake H. Fiedler RRPT ,&nbsp;Glenn M. Sturchio PhD ,&nbsp;Allison Cabalka MD ,&nbsp;Patricia J.M. Best MD ,&nbsp;Rajiv Gulati MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Mayra Guerrero MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jscai.2024.102239","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Concern about fetus radiation dose and assumed health effects remains a barrier for women considering a career in invasive cardiology. However, there is a lack of real-world fetus exposure data that can be used to support career decisions. The purpose of this work was to measure radiation exposure to invasive cardiologists which would contribute to dose to the fetus during pregnancy.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Radiation exposure to 42 female and male interventional cardiologists and electrophysiologists was monitored during their clinical routine. Multivariate analysis was used to assess the influences of patient radiation exposure, radioprotective garment material thickness (0.25, 0.35, 0.5 mm Pb equivalent), and cardiologist sex, height, and clinical role on occupational radiation exposure to the abdomen.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Exposure to the abdomen of invasive cardiologists increased proportional to patient exposure and decreased predictably with increasing radioprotective material thickness. The median abdomen exposure when covered with a 0.5 mm Pb equivalent radioprotective material over a 40-week period was 0.22 mGy (95th percentile, 0.8 mGy). Physician sex, height, and clinical role did not influence occupational exposure.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The use of a 0.5 mm Pb equivalent radioprotective garment covering the abdomen, combined with appropriate radiation safety practices, can ensure that fetus radiation dose is below both US and international limits. Assumed fetus risk due to very low occupational radiation exposure is likely inconsequential in light of other known pregnancy risks.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73990,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions","volume":"3 9","pages":"Article 102239"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772930324016211/pdfft?md5=f1b18b9abc25c82d9a168777d76c7501&pid=1-s2.0-S2772930324016211-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772930324016211","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Concern about fetus radiation dose and assumed health effects remains a barrier for women considering a career in invasive cardiology. However, there is a lack of real-world fetus exposure data that can be used to support career decisions. The purpose of this work was to measure radiation exposure to invasive cardiologists which would contribute to dose to the fetus during pregnancy.

Methods

Radiation exposure to 42 female and male interventional cardiologists and electrophysiologists was monitored during their clinical routine. Multivariate analysis was used to assess the influences of patient radiation exposure, radioprotective garment material thickness (0.25, 0.35, 0.5 mm Pb equivalent), and cardiologist sex, height, and clinical role on occupational radiation exposure to the abdomen.

Results

Exposure to the abdomen of invasive cardiologists increased proportional to patient exposure and decreased predictably with increasing radioprotective material thickness. The median abdomen exposure when covered with a 0.5 mm Pb equivalent radioprotective material over a 40-week period was 0.22 mGy (95th percentile, 0.8 mGy). Physician sex, height, and clinical role did not influence occupational exposure.

Conclusions

The use of a 0.5 mm Pb equivalent radioprotective garment covering the abdomen, combined with appropriate radiation safety practices, can ensure that fetus radiation dose is below both US and international limits. Assumed fetus risk due to very low occupational radiation exposure is likely inconsequential in light of other known pregnancy risks.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
假定)怀孕的介入心脏病学家和电生理学家的辐射暴露和防护
背景对胎儿辐射剂量和假定的健康影响的担忧仍然是女性考虑从事有创心脏病学研究的一个障碍。然而,目前缺乏可用于支持职业决策的真实胎儿辐照数据。这项工作的目的是测量有创心脏病学家的辐射暴露,这将导致怀孕期间胎儿所受的辐射剂量。结果介入性心脏病专家的腹部辐照量与患者辐照量成正比增加,并随着辐射防护材料厚度的增加而减少。在为期 40 周的时间里,当腹部被 0.5 毫米铅当量的辐射防护材料覆盖时,腹部辐照量的中位数为 0.22 mGy(第 95 百分位数为 0.8 mGy)。结论使用 0.5 毫米铅当量的辐射防护服覆盖腹部,并结合适当的辐射安全措施,可确保胎儿的辐射剂量低于美国和国际限值。鉴于其他已知的妊娠风险,极低的职业辐照对胎儿造成的假定风险可能无关紧要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
48 days
期刊最新文献
Three-Dimensional Rotational Angiography to Guide Cardiac Catheterization in Critical Infants Below 5kg of Body Weight. Transcatheter Atrioventricular Valve Repair and Replacement Technologies in Pediatric and Adult Congenital Heart Disease: A Paradigm for Improving Access. Carotid Artery Stenting. Coronary Function Testing: Seeking Answers for Refractory Chest Pain. Intravascular Coronary Imaging.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1