Cognitive behavioral group therapy for social anxiety disorder – A critical review of methodological designs

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Journal of Anxiety Disorders Pub Date : 2024-09-13 DOI:10.1016/j.janxdis.2024.102928
Julie A. Wojtaszek , Ellen I. Koch , Eamonn Arble , Tamara M. Loverich
{"title":"Cognitive behavioral group therapy for social anxiety disorder – A critical review of methodological designs","authors":"Julie A. Wojtaszek ,&nbsp;Ellen I. Koch ,&nbsp;Eamonn Arble ,&nbsp;Tamara M. Loverich","doi":"10.1016/j.janxdis.2024.102928","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Social anxiety disorder (SAD) is highly prevalent with significant lifetime impacts, especially when left untreated. Cognitive behavioral therapy is the current gold standard treatment with successful patient outcomes. Cognitive behavioral group therapy (CBGT) is one form that provides unique benefits to participants including normalization of symptoms and social support, as well as providing increased access to treatment at a lower per-session cost. Research on this mode of treatment has been ongoing for over 20 years, but we still have much to learn about its overall efficacy. The goals of this critical review were to summarize and evaluate the most current research, including an analysis of the overall methodological design quality, and provide recommendations for the enhancement of future studies based on best practices. Recent studies included some best practice design elements used in measuring efficacy such as the use of comparison groups, masking procedures, fidelity assessments, and consideration of clinical significance in outcomes. However, many gaps exist such as a lack of consensus around measures and therapy manuals, as well as baseline competencies of facilitators. Future studies should consider incorporating additional best practice elements aligning with study goals to strengthen designs and provide the field with even more confidence in this mode of treatment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48390,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anxiety Disorders","volume":"107 ","pages":"Article 102928"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anxiety Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S088761852400104X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Social anxiety disorder (SAD) is highly prevalent with significant lifetime impacts, especially when left untreated. Cognitive behavioral therapy is the current gold standard treatment with successful patient outcomes. Cognitive behavioral group therapy (CBGT) is one form that provides unique benefits to participants including normalization of symptoms and social support, as well as providing increased access to treatment at a lower per-session cost. Research on this mode of treatment has been ongoing for over 20 years, but we still have much to learn about its overall efficacy. The goals of this critical review were to summarize and evaluate the most current research, including an analysis of the overall methodological design quality, and provide recommendations for the enhancement of future studies based on best practices. Recent studies included some best practice design elements used in measuring efficacy such as the use of comparison groups, masking procedures, fidelity assessments, and consideration of clinical significance in outcomes. However, many gaps exist such as a lack of consensus around measures and therapy manuals, as well as baseline competencies of facilitators. Future studies should consider incorporating additional best practice elements aligning with study goals to strengthen designs and provide the field with even more confidence in this mode of treatment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
治疗社交焦虑症的认知行为团体疗法--方法设计评述
社交焦虑症(SAD)的发病率很高,对患者的一生都有重大影响,尤其是在未经治疗的情况下。认知行为疗法是目前最有效的治疗方法,对患者的治疗效果非常明显。认知行为团体疗法(CBGT)是一种能为参与者带来独特益处的疗法,包括症状正常化和社会支持,以及以较低的每次治疗费用提供更多的治疗机会。对这种治疗模式的研究已经持续了 20 多年,但我们对其整体疗效仍有很多需要了解的地方。本评论旨在总结和评估当前的最新研究,包括对整体方法设计质量的分析,并根据最佳实践为今后的研究提供改进建议。近期的研究包括一些用于衡量疗效的最佳实践设计元素,如使用对比组、掩蔽程序、保真度评估以及考虑结果的临床意义。然而,研究中还存在许多不足,例如在测量方法和治疗手册以及促进者的基线能力方面缺乏共识。未来的研究应考虑纳入更多与研究目标相一致的最佳实践要素,以加强设计,使该领域对这种治疗模式更有信心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.60
自引率
2.90%
发文量
95
期刊介绍: The Journal of Anxiety Disorders is an interdisciplinary journal that publishes research papers on all aspects of anxiety disorders for individuals of all age groups, including children, adolescents, adults, and the elderly. Manuscripts that focus on disorders previously classified as anxiety disorders such as obsessive-compulsive disorder and posttraumatic stress disorder, as well as the new category of illness anxiety disorder, are also within the scope of the journal. The research areas of focus include traditional, behavioral, cognitive, and biological assessment; diagnosis and classification; psychosocial and psychopharmacological treatment; genetics; epidemiology; and prevention. The journal welcomes theoretical and review articles that significantly contribute to current knowledge in the field. It is abstracted and indexed in various databases such as Elsevier, BIOBASE, PubMed/Medline, PsycINFO, BIOSIS Citation Index, BRS Data, Current Contents - Social & Behavioral Sciences, Pascal Francis, Scopus, and Google Scholar.
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum to “Metacognitive therapy versus exposure and response prevention for obsessive-compulsive disorder – a non-inferiority randomized controlled trial” Journal of Anxiety Disorders (2024), Volume 104, June 2024, 102873 Excessive avoidance bias towards uncertain faces in non-clinical social anxiety individuals Interplay of serum BDNF levels and childhood adversity in predicting earlier-onset post-traumatic stress disorder: A two-year longitudinal study Negative emotion differentiation buffers against intergenerational risk for social anxiety in at-risk adolescent girls Intensive treatments for children and adolescents with anxiety or obsessive-compulsive disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1