A systematic review to assess the impact of amino acids or their derivatives on skeletal muscle wasting in critically ill patients

IF 6.6 2区 医学 Q1 NUTRITION & DIETETICS Clinical nutrition Pub Date : 2024-09-13 DOI:10.1016/j.clnu.2024.09.025
Kym Wittholz , Emma Bidgood , Kate Fetterplace , Alistair McLean , Olav Rooyackers , Adam M. Deane , Amalia Karahalios
{"title":"A systematic review to assess the impact of amino acids or their derivatives on skeletal muscle wasting in critically ill patients","authors":"Kym Wittholz ,&nbsp;Emma Bidgood ,&nbsp;Kate Fetterplace ,&nbsp;Alistair McLean ,&nbsp;Olav Rooyackers ,&nbsp;Adam M. Deane ,&nbsp;Amalia Karahalios","doi":"10.1016/j.clnu.2024.09.025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>It is plausible that supplementation with specific amino acids or metabolites could attenuate skeletal muscle wasting during critical illness. The aim of this systematic review was to explore if amino acids or their derivatives impact skeletal muscle wastage in critically ill adults.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Four databases were systematically searched to identify randomised control trials which delivered enteral supplemental amino acids, or their metabolites compared with placebo, standard care or no intervention, to critically ill patients and reported outcomes of skeletal muscle mass, plasma amino acids, nitrogen balance, or muscle strength. Two authors independently completed screening, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 Tool. A meta-analysis was planned but heterogeneity in the type of intervention used and outcome assessment precluded this. Therefore, data were synthesised using vote counting.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Thirty randomised control trials, comprising 1976 patients were included. The most frequently studied interventional amino acid or metabolite was glutamine (n = 12 trials), a combination (n = 9), arginine (n = 6), β-hydroxy β-methylbutyrate (HMB) (n = 2) or ornithine (n = 1). Six trials (including 284 participants) measured skeletal muscle following supplementation, four of which used HMB alone or in combination as the intervention. Of these, one trial observed an attenuation of muscle wasting with a combination of amino acids, one observed an exacerbation of muscle wasting with HMB, three trials observed no impact on muscle wasting with HMB or a combination of amino acids and one trial reported no information.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Six trials have investigated the effect of enteral amino acid or amino acid metabolite supplementation on muscle mass in critically ill. Heterogeneity of interventions, outcome assessments and direction of effects limits the certainty regarding the effect of supplemental amino acids, or their metabolites, on skeletal muscle wasting during critical illness.</p><p>The trial protocol is registered on PROSPERO (CRD42021275989).</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10517,"journal":{"name":"Clinical nutrition","volume":"43 10","pages":"Pages 2458-2472"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261561424003364/pdfft?md5=ec1f70d2c070e8a07bf3a9604ab032f2&pid=1-s2.0-S0261561424003364-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261561424003364","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

It is plausible that supplementation with specific amino acids or metabolites could attenuate skeletal muscle wasting during critical illness. The aim of this systematic review was to explore if amino acids or their derivatives impact skeletal muscle wastage in critically ill adults.

Methods

Four databases were systematically searched to identify randomised control trials which delivered enteral supplemental amino acids, or their metabolites compared with placebo, standard care or no intervention, to critically ill patients and reported outcomes of skeletal muscle mass, plasma amino acids, nitrogen balance, or muscle strength. Two authors independently completed screening, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 Tool. A meta-analysis was planned but heterogeneity in the type of intervention used and outcome assessment precluded this. Therefore, data were synthesised using vote counting.

Results

Thirty randomised control trials, comprising 1976 patients were included. The most frequently studied interventional amino acid or metabolite was glutamine (n = 12 trials), a combination (n = 9), arginine (n = 6), β-hydroxy β-methylbutyrate (HMB) (n = 2) or ornithine (n = 1). Six trials (including 284 participants) measured skeletal muscle following supplementation, four of which used HMB alone or in combination as the intervention. Of these, one trial observed an attenuation of muscle wasting with a combination of amino acids, one observed an exacerbation of muscle wasting with HMB, three trials observed no impact on muscle wasting with HMB or a combination of amino acids and one trial reported no information.

Conclusion

Six trials have investigated the effect of enteral amino acid or amino acid metabolite supplementation on muscle mass in critically ill. Heterogeneity of interventions, outcome assessments and direction of effects limits the certainty regarding the effect of supplemental amino acids, or their metabolites, on skeletal muscle wasting during critical illness.

The trial protocol is registered on PROSPERO (CRD42021275989).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估氨基酸或其衍生物对重症患者骨骼肌消耗的影响的系统综述
背景在危重病期间补充特定氨基酸或代谢物可能会减轻骨骼肌消耗。本系统性综述旨在探讨氨基酸或其衍生物是否会影响重症成人的骨骼肌消耗。方法系统性检索了四个数据库,以确定向重症患者提供肠内补充氨基酸或其代谢物与安慰剂、标准护理或无干预相比,并报告骨骼肌质量、血浆氨基酸、氮平衡或肌肉力量结果的随机对照试验。两位作者独立完成了筛选、数据提取以及使用 Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 工具进行偏倚风险评估。原计划进行荟萃分析,但由于使用的干预类型和结果评估存在异质性,因此无法进行荟萃分析。结果共纳入了 30 项随机对照试验,包括 1976 名患者。最常研究的干预性氨基酸或代谢物是谷氨酰胺(12 项试验)、组合(9 项试验)、精氨酸(6 项试验)、β-羟基 β-甲基丁酸(HMB)(2 项试验)或鸟氨酸(1 项试验)。六项试验(包括 284 名参与者)对补充营养后的骨骼肌进行了测量,其中四项试验单独或联合使用 HMB 作为干预措施。结论六项试验研究了肠内补充氨基酸或氨基酸代谢物对重症患者肌肉质量的影响。干预措施、结果评估和影响方向的异质性限制了补充氨基酸或其代谢物对重症患者骨骼肌消耗影响的确定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical nutrition
Clinical nutrition 医学-营养学
CiteScore
14.10
自引率
6.30%
发文量
356
审稿时长
28 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Nutrition, the official journal of ESPEN, The European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism, is an international journal providing essential scientific information on nutritional and metabolic care and the relationship between nutrition and disease both in the setting of basic science and clinical practice. Published bi-monthly, each issue combines original articles and reviews providing an invaluable reference for any specialist concerned with these fields.
期刊最新文献
Reply - Letter to the editor entitled "Letter to editor - Dietary and lifestyle inflammation scores in relation to colorectal cancer recurrence and all-cause mortality: A longitudinal analysis". Nourishing sustainability: Clinical nutrition's impact on climate change. Letter to Editor–Dietary and lifestyle inflammation scores in relation to colorectal cancer recurrence and all-cause mortality: A longitudinal analysis Letter to the Editor–“Dietary and lifestyle inflammation scores in relation to colorectal cancer recurrence and all-cause mortality: A longitudinal analysis” Implementing the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) criteria in Crohn's disease: Prevalence of malnutrition and association with clinical outcomes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1