{"title":"Effect of intravenous thiamine administration on critically ill patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials","authors":"Nobuto Nakanishi , Yoshinobu Abe , Mizue Matsuo , Akihito Tampo , Kohei Yamada , Junji Hatakeyama , Minoru Yoshida , Ryo Yamamoto , Naoki Higashibeppu , Kensuke Nakamura , Joji Kotani","doi":"10.1016/j.clnu.2024.09.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background &Aims</h3><p>Thiamine is an essential micronutrient for energy metabolism. Thiamine deficiency is frequently observed in critically ill patients. However, the effect of thiamine administration is unclear in critically ill patients.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis. To identify randomized controlled trials on the effect of thiamine administration in critically ill patients, a literature search was conducted in MEDLINE, CENTRAL, and ICHUSHI databases from inception to April 2023. Pooled effect estimates were calculated about mortality as the primary outcome and shock duration, lactate level, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, delirium, length of mechanical ventilation, length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay, infection rate, all adverse events, and Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) as the secondary outcomes. The certainty of evidence (CoE) was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Overall, 35 studies (3494 patients) were included. Evidence suggested that thiamine administration resulted in little to no difference in mortality (risk ratio [RR], 0.89; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.75 to 1.06; Low CoE); however, thiamine administration may reduce shock duration (mean difference [MD], −11.43 h; 95% CI, −20.16 to −2.69 h; Low CoE), lactate level (MD, −0.34 mmol/L; 95% CI, −0.63 to −0.05 mmol/L; Low CoE), and SOFA score (MD, −1.29; 95% CI, −1.91 to −0.66; Low CoE). Conversely, thiamine administration resulted in a slight increase in the length of ICU stay (MD, 0.40 days; 95% CI, 0.01–0.79 days; High CoE).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Although thiamine administration may reduce shock state, it may not reduce mortality, and slightly increases the length of ICU stay.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10517,"journal":{"name":"Clinical nutrition","volume":"43 11","pages":"Pages 1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261561424003133","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background &Aims
Thiamine is an essential micronutrient for energy metabolism. Thiamine deficiency is frequently observed in critically ill patients. However, the effect of thiamine administration is unclear in critically ill patients.
Methods
We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis. To identify randomized controlled trials on the effect of thiamine administration in critically ill patients, a literature search was conducted in MEDLINE, CENTRAL, and ICHUSHI databases from inception to April 2023. Pooled effect estimates were calculated about mortality as the primary outcome and shock duration, lactate level, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, delirium, length of mechanical ventilation, length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay, infection rate, all adverse events, and Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) as the secondary outcomes. The certainty of evidence (CoE) was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach.
Results
Overall, 35 studies (3494 patients) were included. Evidence suggested that thiamine administration resulted in little to no difference in mortality (risk ratio [RR], 0.89; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.75 to 1.06; Low CoE); however, thiamine administration may reduce shock duration (mean difference [MD], −11.43 h; 95% CI, −20.16 to −2.69 h; Low CoE), lactate level (MD, −0.34 mmol/L; 95% CI, −0.63 to −0.05 mmol/L; Low CoE), and SOFA score (MD, −1.29; 95% CI, −1.91 to −0.66; Low CoE). Conversely, thiamine administration resulted in a slight increase in the length of ICU stay (MD, 0.40 days; 95% CI, 0.01–0.79 days; High CoE).
Conclusions
Although thiamine administration may reduce shock state, it may not reduce mortality, and slightly increases the length of ICU stay.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Nutrition, the official journal of ESPEN, The European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism, is an international journal providing essential scientific information on nutritional and metabolic care and the relationship between nutrition and disease both in the setting of basic science and clinical practice. Published bi-monthly, each issue combines original articles and reviews providing an invaluable reference for any specialist concerned with these fields.