Midwife-led quality improvement: Increasing the use of evidence-based birth practices in Uganda

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Midwifery Pub Date : 2024-09-12 DOI:10.1016/j.midw.2024.104188
Johanna Blomgren , Helena Lindgren , Dinah Amongin , Kerstin Erlandsson , Christina Lundberg , Annette E. Kanyunyuzi , Sarah Muwanguzi , Victoria M. Babyrie , Ketty Ogwang , Dinnah Aineomugasho , Namutosi Catherine , Michael B. Wells
{"title":"Midwife-led quality improvement: Increasing the use of evidence-based birth practices in Uganda","authors":"Johanna Blomgren ,&nbsp;Helena Lindgren ,&nbsp;Dinah Amongin ,&nbsp;Kerstin Erlandsson ,&nbsp;Christina Lundberg ,&nbsp;Annette E. Kanyunyuzi ,&nbsp;Sarah Muwanguzi ,&nbsp;Victoria M. Babyrie ,&nbsp;Ketty Ogwang ,&nbsp;Dinnah Aineomugasho ,&nbsp;Namutosi Catherine ,&nbsp;Michael B. Wells","doi":"10.1016/j.midw.2024.104188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Addressing the evidence-to-practice gap in midwifery is vital for improving maternal and newborn health outcomes. Despite the potential of involving midwives in quality improvement interventions to address this gap, such interventions are understudied. In a Ugandan urban hospital, midwifery practices with a significant evidence-to-practice gap have been identified as areas for clinical improvement.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>The primary objective of the Quality Improvement was to increase the uptake of identified and essential midwifery practices through a quality improvement approach led by midwives.</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>We enrolled 703 women aged 18 years and older with uncomplicated full-term pregnancies (between 37+0 and 42+0 weeks) who gave birth at the facility.</p></div><div><h3>Intervention</h3><p>The intervention focused on evidence-based practices with an identified evidence-to-practice gap: dynamic birth position, including women's involvement in birth position decision-making, perineal protection and intrapartum support. A team of midwives led a seven-month co-created quality improvement intervention. The intervention used Plan–Do–Study–Act (PDSA) cycles, following the Model for Improvement and included a train-the-trainer approach and weekly online support meetings.</p></div><div><h3>Data collection</h3><p>In this single-case prospective observational study, we compared pre-, during and post-intervention uptake of evidence-based practices. Trained research assistants collected data through interviews and observations.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We observed improvements in the uptake of all clinical improvement areas. Dynamic birth positions increased from 0 % to 79 %, decision-making of birth positions from 0 % to 75 %, perineal protection measures from 62 % to 92 % and intrapartum support from 7 % to 67 %.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>A multifactorial midwife-led Quality Improvement resulted in significant and sustained improvements in the uptake of evidence-based practices in maternal and newborn healthcare. If given the mandate and time, midwives can successfully lead Quality Improvements, which enhance the quality of care and close the evidence-to-practice gaps in maternal and newborn health. The study's results underscore the significance of developing effective strategies to enhance care quality and promote the adoption of evidence-based midwifery practices.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":18495,"journal":{"name":"Midwifery","volume":"139 ","pages":"Article 104188"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0266613824002717/pdfft?md5=884886ea8f1865440cef0392f558900d&pid=1-s2.0-S0266613824002717-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Midwifery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0266613824002717","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Addressing the evidence-to-practice gap in midwifery is vital for improving maternal and newborn health outcomes. Despite the potential of involving midwives in quality improvement interventions to address this gap, such interventions are understudied. In a Ugandan urban hospital, midwifery practices with a significant evidence-to-practice gap have been identified as areas for clinical improvement.

Objectives

The primary objective of the Quality Improvement was to increase the uptake of identified and essential midwifery practices through a quality improvement approach led by midwives.

Participants

We enrolled 703 women aged 18 years and older with uncomplicated full-term pregnancies (between 37+0 and 42+0 weeks) who gave birth at the facility.

Intervention

The intervention focused on evidence-based practices with an identified evidence-to-practice gap: dynamic birth position, including women's involvement in birth position decision-making, perineal protection and intrapartum support. A team of midwives led a seven-month co-created quality improvement intervention. The intervention used Plan–Do–Study–Act (PDSA) cycles, following the Model for Improvement and included a train-the-trainer approach and weekly online support meetings.

Data collection

In this single-case prospective observational study, we compared pre-, during and post-intervention uptake of evidence-based practices. Trained research assistants collected data through interviews and observations.

Results

We observed improvements in the uptake of all clinical improvement areas. Dynamic birth positions increased from 0 % to 79 %, decision-making of birth positions from 0 % to 75 %, perineal protection measures from 62 % to 92 % and intrapartum support from 7 % to 67 %.

Conclusion

A multifactorial midwife-led Quality Improvement resulted in significant and sustained improvements in the uptake of evidence-based practices in maternal and newborn healthcare. If given the mandate and time, midwives can successfully lead Quality Improvements, which enhance the quality of care and close the evidence-to-practice gaps in maternal and newborn health. The study's results underscore the significance of developing effective strategies to enhance care quality and promote the adoption of evidence-based midwifery practices.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
助产士主导的质量改进:在乌干达更多地使用循证分娩实践
背景解决助产从证据到实践的差距对于改善孕产妇和新生儿的健康状况至关重要。尽管助产士有可能参与质量改进干预措施以解决这一差距,但此类干预措施的研究却不足。在乌干达的一家城市医院中,证据与实践之间存在巨大差距的助产实践已被确定为临床改进的领域。目标质量改进的主要目标是通过助产士主导的质量改进方法,提高已确定的基本助产实践的采用率。干预措施干预措施的重点是基于证据的实践,并确定了证据与实践之间的差距:动态分娩体位,包括妇女参与分娩体位决策、会阴保护和产前支持。助产士团队领导了为期七个月的共同创建质量改进干预活动。在这项单例前瞻性观察研究中,我们比较了干预前、干预中和干预后对循证实践的采用情况。经过培训的研究助理通过访谈和观察收集数据。动态分娩体位从 0% 增加到 79%,分娩体位决策从 0% 增加到 75%,会阴保护措施从 62% 增加到 92%,产中支持从 7% 增加到 67%。如果有授权和时间,助产士可以成功地领导质量改进工作,从而提高护理质量,缩小孕产妇和新生儿保健方面从证据到实践的差距。研究结果强调了制定有效战略以提高护理质量和促进采用循证助产实践的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Midwifery
Midwifery 医学-护理
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
7.40%
发文量
221
审稿时长
13.4 weeks
期刊介绍: Midwifery publishes the latest peer reviewed international research to inform the safety, quality, outcomes and experiences of pregnancy, birth and maternity care for childbearing women, their babies and families. The journal’s publications support midwives and maternity care providers to explore and develop their knowledge, skills and attitudes informed by best available evidence. Midwifery provides an international, interdisciplinary forum for the publication, dissemination and discussion of advances in evidence, controversies and current research, and promotes continuing education through publication of systematic and other scholarly reviews and updates. Midwifery articles cover the cultural, clinical, psycho-social, sociological, epidemiological, education, managerial, workforce, organizational and technological areas of practice in preconception, maternal and infant care. The journal welcomes the highest quality scholarly research that employs rigorous methodology. Midwifery is a leading international journal in midwifery and maternal health with a current impact factor of 1.861 (© Thomson Reuters Journal Citation Reports 2016) and employs a double-blind peer review process.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board How valuable is an implementation toolkit for midwives? An exploratory study The work of midwives: The socio-institutional theory of the meaning of midwives’ work-life balance International News January 2025 “With an unwanted pregnancy, we are looking for midwives in the neighbourhood to show us what to do.” Stakeholder perceptions of midwife-led woman-centred comprehensive abortion care in the province of Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo: a qualitative descriptive study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1