Resolving the Resource Decision-Making Dilemma of Leaderless Group-Based Multiagent Systems and Repeated Games

IF 8.6 1区 计算机科学 Q1 AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS IEEE Transactions on Systems Man Cybernetics-Systems Pub Date : 2024-07-26 DOI:10.1109/TSMC.2024.3427688
Junxiao Xue;Mingchuang Zhang;Bowei Dong;Lei Shi;Andrés Adolfo Navarro Newball
{"title":"Resolving the Resource Decision-Making Dilemma of Leaderless Group-Based Multiagent Systems and Repeated Games","authors":"Junxiao Xue;Mingchuang Zhang;Bowei Dong;Lei Shi;Andrés Adolfo Navarro Newball","doi":"10.1109/TSMC.2024.3427688","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Leaderless rational individuals often lead the group into a resource decision dilemma in resource competition. Reducing the cost of resource competition while avoiding group decision dilemmas is a challenging task. Inspired by multiagent systems (MASs) and repeated games, we propose a decision-making reward discrimination (DRD) framework to address the resource competition dilemma of leaderless group formation. We aim to model the leaderless group’s resource gaming process using MAS and achieve optimal rewards for the group while minimizing conflict in resource competition. The proposed framework consists of three modules: 1) the decision-making module; 2) the reward module; and 3) the discriminative module. The decision-making module defines the agents and models the decision-making process, while the reward module calculates the group reward in each round using the reward matrix. The discriminative module compares the group reward with the target reward while providing the agent with environmental information. We verify the feasibility of the model through numerous experiments. The results show that agents adopt a revenge strategy to avoid resource competition dilemmas and achieve group reward optimality.","PeriodicalId":48915,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Systems Man Cybernetics-Systems","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Systems Man Cybernetics-Systems","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10611745/","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Leaderless rational individuals often lead the group into a resource decision dilemma in resource competition. Reducing the cost of resource competition while avoiding group decision dilemmas is a challenging task. Inspired by multiagent systems (MASs) and repeated games, we propose a decision-making reward discrimination (DRD) framework to address the resource competition dilemma of leaderless group formation. We aim to model the leaderless group’s resource gaming process using MAS and achieve optimal rewards for the group while minimizing conflict in resource competition. The proposed framework consists of three modules: 1) the decision-making module; 2) the reward module; and 3) the discriminative module. The decision-making module defines the agents and models the decision-making process, while the reward module calculates the group reward in each round using the reward matrix. The discriminative module compares the group reward with the target reward while providing the agent with environmental information. We verify the feasibility of the model through numerous experiments. The results show that agents adopt a revenge strategy to avoid resource competition dilemmas and achieve group reward optimality.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
解决无领导小组多代理系统和重复博弈的资源决策困境
在资源竞争中,无领导的理性个体往往会导致群体陷入资源决策困境。在避免群体决策困境的同时降低资源竞争成本是一项具有挑战性的任务。受多代理系统(MAS)和重复博弈的启发,我们提出了一种决策奖赏判别(DRD)框架,以解决无领导小组形成过程中的资源竞争困境。我们的目标是利用 MAS 对无领导小组的资源博弈过程进行建模,并在资源竞争冲突最小化的同时实现小组的最优回报。所提出的框架由三个模块组成:1)决策模块;2)奖励模块;3)判别模块。决策模块定义了代理并模拟了决策过程,而奖励模块则利用奖励矩阵计算每轮的群体奖励。判别模块在为代理提供环境信息的同时,将群体奖励与目标奖励进行比较。我们通过大量实验验证了该模型的可行性。结果表明,代理采用复仇策略避免了资源竞争困境,并实现了群体奖励最优。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
IEEE Transactions on Systems Man Cybernetics-Systems
IEEE Transactions on Systems Man Cybernetics-Systems AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS-COMPUTER SCIENCE, CYBERNETICS
CiteScore
18.50
自引率
11.50%
发文量
812
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems encompasses the fields of systems engineering, covering issue formulation, analysis, and modeling throughout the systems engineering lifecycle phases. It addresses decision-making, issue interpretation, systems management, processes, and various methods such as optimization, modeling, and simulation in the development and deployment of large systems.
期刊最新文献
Table of Contents Table of Contents Guest Editorial Enabling Technologies and Systems for Industry 5.0: From Foundation Models to Foundation Intelligence IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics publication information IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics publication information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1