Application of covered stent implantation combined with radical tumor resection in advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma involving the carotid artery: a comparative study with historical literature.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY Acta Oto-Laryngologica Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-20 DOI:10.1080/00016489.2024.2400299
Haidong Zhang, Kai Sun, Shanchun Gong, Lijuan Zhou, Siping Liang, Chao Wang, Kai Liu, Xianjun Lyn, Zhenkun Yu
{"title":"Application of covered stent implantation combined with radical tumor resection in advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma involving the carotid artery: a comparative study with historical literature.","authors":"Haidong Zhang, Kai Sun, Shanchun Gong, Lijuan Zhou, Siping Liang, Chao Wang, Kai Liu, Xianjun Lyn, Zhenkun Yu","doi":"10.1080/00016489.2024.2400299","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Studies have shown that carotid artery reconstruction results in the best overall survival (OS) in Advanced Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma involving the Carotid Artery (AHNSCC-CA).</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of covered stent implantation combined with radical tumor resection and to compare and analyze the historical literature on conventional carotid artery resection and reconstruction.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 68 patients with AHNSCC-CA were included in this study. This study compared the survival, local recurrence, surgical complications, and neurologic complications between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The OS rate at 12 months in the experimental group was 58.5% (median survival time: 15 months, 95% CI: 7.61-22.40). The OS rate at 12 months in the control group was 34.3% (median survival time: 8 months, 95% CI: 3.94-12.06, <i>p</i> = .371). In addition, the differences in the rates of local recurrence, surgical complications and neurological complications between the two groups were statistically insignificant (<i>p</i> = .677, <i>p</i> = .197 and <i>p</i> = .617).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and significance: </strong>Compared with conventional carotid artery resection and reconstruction, covered stent implantation combined with radical tumor resection yields similar survival outcomes, but with significantly lower surgical risk and difficulty, and faster postoperative recovery.</p>","PeriodicalId":6880,"journal":{"name":"Acta Oto-Laryngologica","volume":" ","pages":"524-530"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Oto-Laryngologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00016489.2024.2400299","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Studies have shown that carotid artery reconstruction results in the best overall survival (OS) in Advanced Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma involving the Carotid Artery (AHNSCC-CA).

Aims: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of covered stent implantation combined with radical tumor resection and to compare and analyze the historical literature on conventional carotid artery resection and reconstruction.

Materials and methods: A total of 68 patients with AHNSCC-CA were included in this study. This study compared the survival, local recurrence, surgical complications, and neurologic complications between the two groups.

Results: The OS rate at 12 months in the experimental group was 58.5% (median survival time: 15 months, 95% CI: 7.61-22.40). The OS rate at 12 months in the control group was 34.3% (median survival time: 8 months, 95% CI: 3.94-12.06, p = .371). In addition, the differences in the rates of local recurrence, surgical complications and neurological complications between the two groups were statistically insignificant (p = .677, p = .197 and p = .617).

Conclusions and significance: Compared with conventional carotid artery resection and reconstruction, covered stent implantation combined with radical tumor resection yields similar survival outcomes, but with significantly lower surgical risk and difficulty, and faster postoperative recovery.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
覆盖支架植入联合肿瘤根治性切除术在累及颈动脉的晚期头颈部鳞状细胞癌中的应用:与历史文献的比较研究。
背景:研究表明,颈动脉重建可使累及颈动脉的晚期头颈部鳞状细胞癌(AHNSCC-CA)患者获得最佳总生存率(OS)。研究目的:本研究旨在评估覆盖支架植入联合肿瘤根治性切除术的疗效,并比较和分析传统颈动脉切除和重建的历史文献:本研究共纳入68例AHNSCC-CA患者。研究比较了两组患者的生存率、局部复发率、手术并发症和神经系统并发症:实验组 12 个月的 OS 率为 58.5%(中位生存时间:15 个月,95% CI:7.61-22.40)。对照组 12 个月的 OS 率为 34.3%(中位生存时间:8 个月,95% CI:3.94-12.06,P = 0.371)。此外,两组患者的局部复发率、手术并发症和神经系统并发症的发生率差异无统计学意义(P = .677、P = .197 和 P = .617):结论和意义:与传统的颈动脉切除和重建术相比,覆盖支架植入联合肿瘤根治性切除术可获得相似的生存结果,但手术风险和难度明显降低,术后恢复更快。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Oto-Laryngologica
Acta Oto-Laryngologica 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
99
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Oto-Laryngologica is a truly international journal for translational otolaryngology and head- and neck surgery. The journal presents cutting-edge papers on clinical practice, clinical research and basic sciences. Acta also bridges the gap between clinical and basic research.
期刊最新文献
Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps: predictors of recurrence 5 years after surgery. Extent of abscess development in cervical abscesses and pathogenic bacteria related to swallowing function. Narrow band imaging in oral cancer did not improve visualisation of the tumour borders: a prospective cohort study. Improved intracochlear biopolymeric drug delivery system: an in vivo study. Case-control study of otoconia proteins otolin-1 and otoconin-90 in patients with Meniere's disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1