Optimizing the implementation of Enhanced Barrier Precautions in community-based nursing homes.

IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES American journal of infection control Pub Date : 2024-09-20 DOI:10.1016/j.ajic.2024.09.014
Stephanie Mayoryk, Lyndsay M O'Hara, Gwen L Robinson, Alison D Lydecker, Kara Jacobs Slifka, Heather Jones, Mary-Claire Roghmann
{"title":"Optimizing the implementation of Enhanced Barrier Precautions in community-based nursing homes.","authors":"Stephanie Mayoryk, Lyndsay M O'Hara, Gwen L Robinson, Alison D Lydecker, Kara Jacobs Slifka, Heather Jones, Mary-Claire Roghmann","doi":"10.1016/j.ajic.2024.09.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) recommends using gowns and gloves for certain nursing home residents during specific high-contact care activities associated with multidrug-resistant organism (MDRO) transmission. Though EBP is included in CDC guidance as an MDRO control strategy, optimal implementation approaches remain unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We implemented a quality improvement initiative using the 4E process model (Engagement, Education, Execution, and Evaluation) to optimize EBP implementation in four Maryland nursing homes. Semi-structured interviews with healthcare personnel (HCP) occurred to understand EBP acceptability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Glove use during high-contact care increased from 85% in the baseline to 97% during the intervention (p<0.01). Gown use increased from 27% to 78% (p<0.01). Accuracy of identifying residents eligible for EBP improved from 63% to 99% (p<0.01). Of 780 residents observed, one-third met EBP indications - MDRO colonization (21%), indwelling medical device (14%), and/or chronic wound (10%). The most noted facilitator to EBP implementation included HCP perception that EBP reduces MDRO transmission to other residents and staff. The most noted barrier was uncomfortable gowns.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Implementation was complex and required comprehensive assessments of barriers and facilitators within each facility. HCP interviews identified common barriers and facilitators of EBP that can inform future EBP implementation projects.</p>","PeriodicalId":7621,"journal":{"name":"American journal of infection control","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of infection control","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2024.09.014","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) recommends using gowns and gloves for certain nursing home residents during specific high-contact care activities associated with multidrug-resistant organism (MDRO) transmission. Though EBP is included in CDC guidance as an MDRO control strategy, optimal implementation approaches remain unclear.

Methods: We implemented a quality improvement initiative using the 4E process model (Engagement, Education, Execution, and Evaluation) to optimize EBP implementation in four Maryland nursing homes. Semi-structured interviews with healthcare personnel (HCP) occurred to understand EBP acceptability.

Results: Glove use during high-contact care increased from 85% in the baseline to 97% during the intervention (p<0.01). Gown use increased from 27% to 78% (p<0.01). Accuracy of identifying residents eligible for EBP improved from 63% to 99% (p<0.01). Of 780 residents observed, one-third met EBP indications - MDRO colonization (21%), indwelling medical device (14%), and/or chronic wound (10%). The most noted facilitator to EBP implementation included HCP perception that EBP reduces MDRO transmission to other residents and staff. The most noted barrier was uncomfortable gowns.

Conclusions: Implementation was complex and required comprehensive assessments of barriers and facilitators within each facility. HCP interviews identified common barriers and facilitators of EBP that can inform future EBP implementation projects.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
优化社区养老院强化屏障防护措施的实施。
背景:强化屏障预防措施(EBP)建议在与耐多药生物体(MDRO)传播有关的特定高接触护理活动中为某些养老院居民穿戴防护服和手套。尽管 EBP 作为一种 MDRO 控制策略已被纳入疾病预防控制中心指南,但最佳实施方法仍不明确:我们采用 4E 流程模型(参与、教育、执行和评估)实施了一项质量改进计划,以优化 EBP 在马里兰州四家养老院的实施。对医护人员(HCP)进行了半结构化访谈,以了解 EBP 的可接受性:结果:在高接触护理过程中,手套的使用率从基线的 85% 提高到干预期间的 97%(p 结论:EBP 的实施非常复杂,需要进行全面的评估:实施过程非常复杂,需要对每个机构内的障碍和促进因素进行全面评估。HCP访谈发现了EBP的常见障碍和促进因素,可为未来的EBP实施项目提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
4.10%
发文量
479
审稿时长
24 days
期刊介绍: AJIC covers key topics and issues in infection control and epidemiology. Infection control professionals, including physicians, nurses, and epidemiologists, rely on AJIC for peer-reviewed articles covering clinical topics as well as original research. As the official publication of the Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology (APIC)
期刊最新文献
Spine surgical site infection outcome with preoperative application of a pre-saturated 10% povidone-iodine nasal decolonization product in a 32-bed surgical hospital. Total Outward Leakage of Face-Worn Products Used by The General Public for Source Control. Ralstonia mannitolilytica infection in a tertiary care centre: an outbreak report. Integrating Residents' Rights and Infection Prevention in Nursing Homes: Summary of the Infection Control Advocate and Resident Education (ICARE) Learning Modules Pilot for Long-term Care Ombudsmen, Residents, and Other Nursing Home Advocates. Integration of an electronic hand hygiene auditing system with electronic health records using machine learning to predict hospital-acquired infection in a healthcare setting.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1