Robot-assisted vs. laparoscopic right hemicolectomy in octogenarians and nonagenarians: an analysis of the US nationwide inpatient sample 2005–2018

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Aging Clinical and Experimental Research Pub Date : 2024-09-23 DOI:10.1007/s40520-024-02833-4
Chien-Chang Lu, Chi-Tung Lu, Kai-Yen Chang, Wang Chun-Li, Chien-Ying Wu
{"title":"Robot-assisted vs. laparoscopic right hemicolectomy in octogenarians and nonagenarians: an analysis of the US nationwide inpatient sample 2005–2018","authors":"Chien-Chang Lu,&nbsp;Chi-Tung Lu,&nbsp;Kai-Yen Chang,&nbsp;Wang Chun-Li,&nbsp;Chien-Ying Wu","doi":"10.1007/s40520-024-02833-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a significant health concern, particularly among older adults. Outcomes between laparoscopic and robot-assisted surgeries for right-sided colon cancers in the oldest old population have yet to be evaluated despite increased use of these surgeries.</p><h3>Aim</h3><p>This study aimed to compare clinical outcomes after robot-assisted right hemicolectomy (RARH) versus laparoscopic right hemicolectomy (LRH) in octogenarian and nonagenarian patients.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>This population-based, retrospective and observational study analyzed the data of adults ≥ 80 years old diagnosed with right-side colon cancer who received RARH or LRH. All data were extracted from the US National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database 2005–2018. Associations between type of surgery and in-hospital outcomes were determined using univariate and multivariable logistic regression and linear regression analysis.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Data of 7,550 patients (representing 37,126 hospitalized patients in the U.S.) were analyzed. Mean age of the study population was 84.8 years, 61.4% were females, and 79.1% were non-smokers. After adjusting for relevant confounders, regression analysis showed that patients undergoing RARH had a significantly shorter LOS (adjusted Beta (aBeta), -0.24, 95% CI: -0.32, -0.15) but greater total hospital costs (aBeta, 26.54, 95% CI: 24.64, 28.44) than patients undergoing LRH. No significant differences in mortality, perioperative complications, and risk of unfavorable discharge were observed between the two procedures (<i>p</i> &gt; 0.05). Stratified analyses by frailty status revealed consistent results.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>RARH is associated with a significantly shorter LOS but higher total hospital costs than LRH among octogenarians and nonagenarians. Other short-term outcomes for this population are similar between the two procedures, including in-hospital mortality, perioperative complications, and unfavorable discharge. These findings also apply to frail patients.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7720,"journal":{"name":"Aging Clinical and Experimental Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11420325/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aging Clinical and Experimental Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40520-024-02833-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a significant health concern, particularly among older adults. Outcomes between laparoscopic and robot-assisted surgeries for right-sided colon cancers in the oldest old population have yet to be evaluated despite increased use of these surgeries.

Aim

This study aimed to compare clinical outcomes after robot-assisted right hemicolectomy (RARH) versus laparoscopic right hemicolectomy (LRH) in octogenarian and nonagenarian patients.

Methods

This population-based, retrospective and observational study analyzed the data of adults ≥ 80 years old diagnosed with right-side colon cancer who received RARH or LRH. All data were extracted from the US National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database 2005–2018. Associations between type of surgery and in-hospital outcomes were determined using univariate and multivariable logistic regression and linear regression analysis.

Results

Data of 7,550 patients (representing 37,126 hospitalized patients in the U.S.) were analyzed. Mean age of the study population was 84.8 years, 61.4% were females, and 79.1% were non-smokers. After adjusting for relevant confounders, regression analysis showed that patients undergoing RARH had a significantly shorter LOS (adjusted Beta (aBeta), -0.24, 95% CI: -0.32, -0.15) but greater total hospital costs (aBeta, 26.54, 95% CI: 24.64, 28.44) than patients undergoing LRH. No significant differences in mortality, perioperative complications, and risk of unfavorable discharge were observed between the two procedures (p > 0.05). Stratified analyses by frailty status revealed consistent results.

Conclusions

RARH is associated with a significantly shorter LOS but higher total hospital costs than LRH among octogenarians and nonagenarians. Other short-term outcomes for this population are similar between the two procedures, including in-hospital mortality, perioperative complications, and unfavorable discharge. These findings also apply to frail patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
八旬老人和非八旬老人的机器人辅助与腹腔镜右半结肠切除术:2005-2018年美国全国住院病人样本分析。
背景:结肠直肠癌(CRC)是一个重大的健康问题,尤其是在老年人中。目的:本研究旨在比较八旬老人和非八旬老人接受机器人辅助右半结肠切除术(RARH)和腹腔镜右半结肠切除术(LRH)后的临床效果:这项基于人群的回顾性观察研究分析了确诊为右侧结肠癌并接受 RARH 或 LRH 手术的≥80 岁成人的数据。所有数据均提取自2005-2018年美国全国住院患者样本(NIS)数据库。采用单变量、多变量逻辑回归和线性回归分析确定手术类型与院内预后之间的关系:对7550名患者(代表美国37126名住院患者)的数据进行了分析。研究对象的平均年龄为 84.8 岁,61.4% 为女性,79.1% 不吸烟。在对相关混杂因素进行调整后,回归分析表明,与接受 LRH 治疗的患者相比,接受 RARH 治疗的患者的 LOS 明显更短(调整后 Beta (aBeta),-0.24,95% CI:-0.32,-0.15),但住院总费用更高(aBeta,26.54,95% CI:24.64,28.44)。两种手术在死亡率、围手术期并发症和不利出院风险方面无明显差异(P > 0.05)。按虚弱状态进行的分层分析结果一致:结论:与 LRH 相比,RARH 可显著缩短八旬老人和非高龄老人的住院时间,但住院总费用更高。在这一人群中,两种手术的其他短期结果相似,包括院内死亡率、围手术期并发症和不利出院。这些发现同样适用于体弱患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
5.00%
发文量
283
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Aging clinical and experimental research offers a multidisciplinary forum on the progressing field of gerontology and geriatrics. The areas covered by the journal include: biogerontology, neurosciences, epidemiology, clinical gerontology and geriatric assessment, social, economical and behavioral gerontology. “Aging clinical and experimental research” appears bimonthly and publishes review articles, original papers and case reports.
期刊最新文献
Validation of the German version of the SarQoL® questionnaire in sarcopenic and probable sarcopenic patients Auto-Global Examination of Mental State (Auto-GEMS): a web-based self-administered cognitive screening Association between frailty status and risk of chronic lung disease: an analysis based on two national prospective cohorts Use of the Brief-BESTest partially instrumented with accelerometry to detect balance deterioration in middle-age Disability trends among elderly Ukrainians in war conditions: a 10-year retrospective study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1