Trends in cancer and heart failure related mortality in adult US population: A CDC WONDER database analysis from 1999 to 2020

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS American heart journal Pub Date : 2024-09-17 DOI:10.1016/j.ahj.2024.09.002
Shurjeel Uddin Qazi MBBS , Arsalan Hamid MD , Huzaifa Ul Haq Ansari MBBS , Michel G. Khouri MD , Markus S. Anker , Michael E. Hall MD , Stefan D. Anker , Javed Butler MD, MPH, MBA , Muhammad Shahzeb Khan MD, MS
{"title":"Trends in cancer and heart failure related mortality in adult US population: A CDC WONDER database analysis from 1999 to 2020","authors":"Shurjeel Uddin Qazi MBBS ,&nbsp;Arsalan Hamid MD ,&nbsp;Huzaifa Ul Haq Ansari MBBS ,&nbsp;Michel G. Khouri MD ,&nbsp;Markus S. Anker ,&nbsp;Michael E. Hall MD ,&nbsp;Stefan D. Anker ,&nbsp;Javed Butler MD, MPH, MBA ,&nbsp;Muhammad Shahzeb Khan MD, MS","doi":"10.1016/j.ahj.2024.09.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>With the advent of novel chemotherapy, survival of patients with cancer has improved. However, people with cancer have an increased risk of heart failure (HF). Conversely, HF-related mortality may undermine survival among people with cancer. We aim to analyze the trends of mortality in people with HF and cancer in the adult US population.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted an examination of death certificates sourced from the CDC WONDER (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Wide-Ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research) database, from the years 1999 to 2020. Mortality in adults with HF and cancer was assessed. Age-adjusted mortality rates (AAMRs) per 100,000 persons and annual percent change were reported.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Between 1999 and 2020, 621,783 deaths occurred from HF in people with cancer. The AAMR declined from 16.4 in 1999 to 11.9 in 2017, after which an increase to 14.5 was observed in 2020. Men had consistently higher overall AAMR as compared to women (men = 18.1 vs women = 9.9). Similar AAMR was observed between non-Hispanic (NH) Blacks/African Americans (13.9) and NH Whites (13.3), with lower in American Indian/Alaska Native (9.6) and Hispanics (7.4). Asian/Pacific Islanders reported the lowest AAMR (5.7). The Midwestern region reported the highest AAMR (14.8). We observed the highest AAMR amongst the older population (61.4).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The mortality rates of people with HF and cancer are increasing in the adult U.S. population. This underscores the need for increased screening, aggressive management, and subsequent surveillance of people at risk or with manifested HF in people with cancer.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7868,"journal":{"name":"American heart journal","volume":"278 ","pages":"Pages 170-180"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American heart journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002870324002357","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

With the advent of novel chemotherapy, survival of patients with cancer has improved. However, people with cancer have an increased risk of heart failure (HF). Conversely, HF-related mortality may undermine survival among people with cancer. We aim to analyze the trends of mortality in people with HF and cancer in the adult US population.

Methods

We conducted an examination of death certificates sourced from the CDC WONDER (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Wide-Ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research) database, from the years 1999 to 2020. Mortality in adults with HF and cancer was assessed. Age-adjusted mortality rates (AAMRs) per 100,000 persons and annual percent change were reported.

Results

Between 1999 and 2020, 621,783 deaths occurred from HF in people with cancer. The AAMR declined from 16.4 in 1999 to 11.9 in 2017, after which an increase to 14.5 was observed in 2020. Men had consistently higher overall AAMR as compared to women (men = 18.1 vs women = 9.9). Similar AAMR was observed between non-Hispanic (NH) Blacks/African Americans (13.9) and NH Whites (13.3), with lower in American Indian/Alaska Native (9.6) and Hispanics (7.4). Asian/Pacific Islanders reported the lowest AAMR (5.7). The Midwestern region reported the highest AAMR (14.8). We observed the highest AAMR amongst the older population (61.4).

Conclusion

The mortality rates of people with HF and cancer are increasing in the adult U.S. population. This underscores the need for increased screening, aggressive management, and subsequent surveillance of people at risk or with manifested HF in people with cancer.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国成年人中与癌症和心力衰竭相关的死亡率趋势:疾病预防控制中心 WONDER 数据库对 1999 年至 2020 年的分析。
背景:随着新型化疗的出现,癌症患者的生存率有所提高。然而,癌症患者患心力衰竭(HF)的风险也在增加。相反,与心力衰竭相关的死亡率可能会影响癌症患者的生存。我们旨在分析美国成年人口中心力衰竭和癌症患者的死亡率趋势:我们对来自美国疾病控制与预防中心 WONDER(美国疾病控制与预防中心流行病学研究广泛在线数据)数据库的 1999 年至 2020 年死亡证明书进行了研究。对患有高血压和癌症的成人死亡率进行了评估。报告了每 10 万人的年龄调整死亡率(AAMRs)和每年的百分比变化:结果:1999 年至 2020 年间,621,783 例癌症患者死于高血压。AAMR从1999年的16.4下降到2017年的11.9,之后在2020年又上升到14.5。与女性相比,男性的总体急性心肌梗死死亡率一直较高(男性 = 18.1 vs 女性 = 9.9)。非西班牙裔(NH)黑人/非洲裔美国人(13.9)和 NH 白人(13.3)之间的 AAMR 相似,而美国印第安人/阿拉斯加原住民(9.6)和西班牙裔美国人(7.4)较低。亚裔/太平洋岛民的 AAMR 最低(5.7)。中西部地区报告的 AAMR 最高(14.8)。我们观察到老年人口的 AAMR 最高(61.4):结论:在美国成年人口中,高血压和癌症患者的死亡率正在上升:结论:在美国成年人群中,心房颤动合并癌症患者的死亡率正在上升:这强调了对癌症患者中的高危人群或有心房颤动表现的人群加强筛查、积极管理和后续监测的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American heart journal
American heart journal 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
2.10%
发文量
214
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: The American Heart Journal will consider for publication suitable articles on topics pertaining to the broad discipline of cardiovascular disease. Our goal is to provide the reader primary investigation, scholarly review, and opinion concerning the practice of cardiovascular medicine. We especially encourage submission of 3 types of reports that are not frequently seen in cardiovascular journals: negative clinical studies, reports on study designs, and studies involving the organization of medical care. The Journal does not accept individual case reports or original articles involving bench laboratory or animal research.
期刊最新文献
Table of Contents Editorial Board Information for Readers Intravascular Imaging-guided versus Angiography-guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus: Rationale and design of an International, Multicenter, Randomized IVI-DIABETES Trial. Rationale, design and pre-randomization data for a cluster randomized trial to assess the effect of a digitally enabled quality improvement intervention on LDL-C control in established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease patients: The SAPPHIRE-LDL Trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1