Processing speed in patients with pediatric cancer: Psychosocial considerations.

IF 1.4 4区 心理学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Applied Neuropsychology: Child Pub Date : 2024-09-14 DOI:10.1080/21622965.2024.2403767
Jenna A Chiang, Paulina T Feghali, Ashley M Whitaker
{"title":"Processing speed in patients with pediatric cancer: Psychosocial considerations.","authors":"Jenna A Chiang, Paulina T Feghali, Ashley M Whitaker","doi":"10.1080/21622965.2024.2403767","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pediatric cancer treatments may contribute to slower processing, while cultural considerations (e.g., SES) can influence outcomes and tend to be disproportionately lower in racial/ethnic minorities. Given increased risk for certain cancers in Hispanic/Latine children and rising Spanish exposure in the United States, the purpose of this study was to examine differences in processing speed between cancer survivors based on household language exposure: English vs. mixed language (ML; i.e. monolingual Spanish-speaking or bilingual Spanish/English-speaking). 128 patients ages 8-21 with leukemia/lymphoma completed screening. As expected, SES was lower in patients from ML households based on parental education (<i>U</i> = 355.00, <i>p</i><.001) and estimated household income (<i>U</i> = 1031.500, <i>p</i><.001). Despite this, processing speed (assessed using the written and oral trials of the Symbol Digit Modalities Test; SDMT) was average (SDMT-W x̅=-.13, SDMT-O x̅=.32), with no significant differences between language groups (<i>F</i>(2,120)=0.966<i>, p</i>=.384). Post-hoc analyses revealed time since diagnosis did not predict performance on oral trial for either group or the whole sample, while poorer performance on written trial was noted among the English-only group when further from diagnosis (SDMT-W F(1,57)=7.829, <i>p</i>=.007). Stable ML group trajectory regardless of time since diagnosis may reflect resiliency among children with Spanish exposure.</p>","PeriodicalId":8047,"journal":{"name":"Applied Neuropsychology: Child","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Neuropsychology: Child","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21622965.2024.2403767","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pediatric cancer treatments may contribute to slower processing, while cultural considerations (e.g., SES) can influence outcomes and tend to be disproportionately lower in racial/ethnic minorities. Given increased risk for certain cancers in Hispanic/Latine children and rising Spanish exposure in the United States, the purpose of this study was to examine differences in processing speed between cancer survivors based on household language exposure: English vs. mixed language (ML; i.e. monolingual Spanish-speaking or bilingual Spanish/English-speaking). 128 patients ages 8-21 with leukemia/lymphoma completed screening. As expected, SES was lower in patients from ML households based on parental education (U = 355.00, p<.001) and estimated household income (U = 1031.500, p<.001). Despite this, processing speed (assessed using the written and oral trials of the Symbol Digit Modalities Test; SDMT) was average (SDMT-W x̅=-.13, SDMT-O x̅=.32), with no significant differences between language groups (F(2,120)=0.966, p=.384). Post-hoc analyses revealed time since diagnosis did not predict performance on oral trial for either group or the whole sample, while poorer performance on written trial was noted among the English-only group when further from diagnosis (SDMT-W F(1,57)=7.829, p=.007). Stable ML group trajectory regardless of time since diagnosis may reflect resiliency among children with Spanish exposure.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
儿科癌症患者的处理速度:社会心理因素。
儿科癌症治疗可能会导致处理速度减慢,而文化因素(如社会经济地位)则会影响治疗结果,而且在少数种族/族裔中,处理速度往往过低。鉴于西班牙裔/拉丁裔儿童罹患某些癌症的风险增加,以及在美国接触西班牙语的人数不断增加,本研究旨在根据家庭语言接触情况(英语与混合语言(ML;即单语西班牙语或双语西班牙语/英语))检查癌症幸存者处理速度的差异。128 名 8-21 岁的白血病/淋巴瘤患者完成了筛查。正如预期的那样,根据父母的教育程度,来自西班牙语家庭的患者的社会经济地位较低(U = 355.00,pU = 1031.500,pF(2,120)=0.966,p=.384)。事后分析表明,诊断后的时间并不能预测任何一组或整个样本的口试成绩,而在距离诊断时间更长的情况下,纯英语组的笔试成绩较差(SDMT-W F(1,57)=7.829, p=.007)。无论诊断时间长短,ML 组的轨迹都很稳定,这可能反映了接触西班牙语的儿童的恢复能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Neuropsychology: Child
Applied Neuropsychology: Child CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-PSYCHOLOGY
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
47
期刊介绍: Applied Neuropsychology: Child publishes clinical neuropsychological articles concerning assessment, brain functioning and neuroimaging, neuropsychological treatment, and rehabilitation in children. Full-length articles and brief communications are included. Case studies of child patients carefully assessing the nature, course, or treatment of clinical neuropsychological dysfunctions in the context of scientific literature, are suitable. Review manuscripts addressing critical issues are encouraged. Preference is given to papers of clinical relevance to others in the field. All submitted manuscripts are subject to initial appraisal by the Editor-in-Chief, and, if found suitable for further considerations are peer reviewed by independent, anonymous expert referees. All peer review is single-blind and submission is online via ScholarOne Manuscripts.
期刊最新文献
Differential diagnosis: Understanding nonverbal learning disorder and autism spectrum disorder. Chanting and meditation: an 8-week intervention to promote executive functions in school-age children. About the relationship between executive function, theory of mind, and language abilities in children with autism: a systematic review. Cognitive profiles and developmental variations in ADHD: A comparative analysis of childhood and adolescent diagnoses. A novel approach to ADHD classification based on severity and emotional impairment: Findings from artificial intelligence analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1