[Construction of a methodology for clinical evaluation of medical devices using simulation tools and illustration through three studies].

IF 1 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Annales pharmaceutiques francaises Pub Date : 2024-09-12 DOI:10.1016/j.pharma.2024.09.003
Cordélia Salomez-Ihl, Claire Chapuis, Pierre Albaladejo, Marielle Picard, Aline Baron, Paz Pardo Garcia, Jean-Noël Evain, Joris Giai, Maud Barbado, Alexandre Moreau-Gaudry, Jean-Luc Bosson, Julien Picard, Pierrick Bedouch
{"title":"[Construction of a methodology for clinical evaluation of medical devices using simulation tools and illustration through three studies].","authors":"Cordélia Salomez-Ihl, Claire Chapuis, Pierre Albaladejo, Marielle Picard, Aline Baron, Paz Pardo Garcia, Jean-Noël Evain, Joris Giai, Maud Barbado, Alexandre Moreau-Gaudry, Jean-Luc Bosson, Julien Picard, Pierrick Bedouch","doi":"10.1016/j.pharma.2024.09.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>European regulations have recently moved towards more stringent requirements for demonstrating the safety and performance of medical devices (MDs).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To apply an innovative testing method using medical simulation to the evaluation of three medical devices at different stages of their life cycle.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The methodology for evaluating DMs using simulation is based on seven stages: definition of the context, training, construction of a scenario to test the DM, validation of the scenario, realization of the scenario, evaluation of the scenario by the players and validation and exploitation of the results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our evaluation methodology enabled us to assess three DMs at different stages of their development: a respiratory protection device at the initial stage (prototype definition), a respiratory protection mask (prototype optimization) and bottle adapters (post-marketing).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Simulation is a valuable tool for evaluating DM. The proposed methodology enables it to be used and adapted to different contexts. It responds to the specificities of clinical evaluation of this class of products, and helps to better anticipate certain risks.</p>","PeriodicalId":8332,"journal":{"name":"Annales pharmaceutiques francaises","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annales pharmaceutiques francaises","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pharma.2024.09.003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: European regulations have recently moved towards more stringent requirements for demonstrating the safety and performance of medical devices (MDs).

Objective: To apply an innovative testing method using medical simulation to the evaluation of three medical devices at different stages of their life cycle.

Method: The methodology for evaluating DMs using simulation is based on seven stages: definition of the context, training, construction of a scenario to test the DM, validation of the scenario, realization of the scenario, evaluation of the scenario by the players and validation and exploitation of the results.

Results: Our evaluation methodology enabled us to assess three DMs at different stages of their development: a respiratory protection device at the initial stage (prototype definition), a respiratory protection mask (prototype optimization) and bottle adapters (post-marketing).

Conclusion: Simulation is a valuable tool for evaluating DM. The proposed methodology enables it to be used and adapted to different contexts. It responds to the specificities of clinical evaluation of this class of products, and helps to better anticipate certain risks.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[利用模拟工具构建医疗器械临床评估方法并通过三项研究加以说明]。
导言:欧洲法规最近对医疗设备(MD)的安全性和性能提出了更严格的要求:目的:采用一种创新的测试方法,利用医学模拟对三种医疗器械在其生命周期的不同阶段进行评估:方法:使用模拟评估 DM 的方法基于七个阶段:定义背景、培训、构建测试 DM 的情景、验证情景、实现情景、参与者评估情景以及验证和利用结果:我们的评估方法使我们能够评估处于不同开发阶段的三种 DM:初始阶段的呼吸保护装置(原型定义)、呼吸保护面罩(原型优化)和瓶子适配器(上市后):结论:模拟是评估 DM 的重要工具。结论:模拟是评估 DM 的重要工具,建议的方法使其能够在不同情况下使用和调整。它符合这类产品临床评估的特殊性,有助于更好地预测某些风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annales pharmaceutiques francaises
Annales pharmaceutiques francaises PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
98
期刊介绍: This journal proposes a scientific information validated and indexed to be informed about the last research works in all the domains interesting the pharmacy. The original works, general reviews, the focusing, the brief notes, subjected by the best academics and the professionals, propose a synthetic approach of the last progress accomplished in the concerned sectors. The thematic Sessions and the – life of the Academy – resume the communications which, presented in front of the national Academy of pharmacy, are in the heart of the current events.
期刊最新文献
Identification of utilization deficiencies post SAP enterprise resource planning implementation in the Algerian Pharmaceutical Sector. The Implications of the EU Ban on Titanium Dioxide: A Comprehensive Review of Safety Concerns and Alternatives. Montmorillonite: An Advanced Material with Diverse Pharmaceutical and Medicinal Applications. [Automated dispensing cabinet: An evaluation of professional practices that says much more than what the authors write]. Advanced stability-indicating RP-HPLC method for the quantification of lurasidone hydrochloride in bulk and PLGA-based in situ implant formulation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1