Implementation of a New Classification and Stratification System for Solitary Bone Tumor: Osseous Tumor Radiological and Interpretation and Management System (OT-RIMS).

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING British Journal of Radiology Pub Date : 2024-09-20 DOI:10.1093/bjr/tqae188
Haijun Wu, Lin Liu, Guimian Zhong, Shasha Wei, Liujin Zeng, Yunyan Zi, Fangping Xu, Mengyu Yao, Yu Zhang, Jiachun Zhuang
{"title":"Implementation of a New Classification and Stratification System for Solitary Bone Tumor: Osseous Tumor Radiological and Interpretation and Management System (OT-RIMS).","authors":"Haijun Wu, Lin Liu, Guimian Zhong, Shasha Wei, Liujin Zeng, Yunyan Zi, Fangping Xu, Mengyu Yao, Yu Zhang, Jiachun Zhuang","doi":"10.1093/bjr/tqae188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To propose a histological-grades-based Osseous Tumor Radiological Interpretation and Management System (OT-RIMS) that would simplify the radiological evaluation of bone tumors, categorize key radiological features into severity levels, and inform corresponding patient management actions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study between January 2015 and August 2022 evaluated patients with solitary bone tumors confirmed by pathology and imaging follow-up received two or three imaging modalities of radiographs, CT, or MRI. Three radiologists independently assessed radiological features, categorized bone lesions based on OT-RIMS criteria, and reached a consensus. Kappa statistics and observed agreement were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 341 patients (mean age, 26.0 years; 159 women) were included, with 102 malignant, 177 benign, and 62 intermediate or low-grade malignant bone lesions. Sensitivity and specificity of readers 1, 2, and 3, respectively, in the identification of malignant tumors into OT-RIMS 4 were 93.1% (95 of 102) and 93.3% (223 of 239), 96.1% (98 of 102) and 91.6% (219 of 239), 92.2% (94 of 102) and 89.5% (214 of 239). Inter-reader agreement of OT-RIMS category for three readers was considered excellent (Kendall's W = 0.924, p < 0.001) with a kappa value of reproducibility in categories 1&2, 3, and 4 of 0.764, 0.528, and 0.930, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The OT-RIMS category demonstrated excellent reproducibility despite the reader's expertise level in categorizing the risk stratification of bone tumors and informing patient management, with histological grades used as the reference standard.</p><p><strong>Advances in knowledge: </strong>The OT-RIMS category reliably stratifies bone tumors into four categories corresponding to histological grades and standardized patient management.</p>","PeriodicalId":9306,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjr/tqae188","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To propose a histological-grades-based Osseous Tumor Radiological Interpretation and Management System (OT-RIMS) that would simplify the radiological evaluation of bone tumors, categorize key radiological features into severity levels, and inform corresponding patient management actions.

Methods: This retrospective study between January 2015 and August 2022 evaluated patients with solitary bone tumors confirmed by pathology and imaging follow-up received two or three imaging modalities of radiographs, CT, or MRI. Three radiologists independently assessed radiological features, categorized bone lesions based on OT-RIMS criteria, and reached a consensus. Kappa statistics and observed agreement were calculated.

Results: A total of 341 patients (mean age, 26.0 years; 159 women) were included, with 102 malignant, 177 benign, and 62 intermediate or low-grade malignant bone lesions. Sensitivity and specificity of readers 1, 2, and 3, respectively, in the identification of malignant tumors into OT-RIMS 4 were 93.1% (95 of 102) and 93.3% (223 of 239), 96.1% (98 of 102) and 91.6% (219 of 239), 92.2% (94 of 102) and 89.5% (214 of 239). Inter-reader agreement of OT-RIMS category for three readers was considered excellent (Kendall's W = 0.924, p < 0.001) with a kappa value of reproducibility in categories 1&2, 3, and 4 of 0.764, 0.528, and 0.930, respectively.

Conclusion: The OT-RIMS category demonstrated excellent reproducibility despite the reader's expertise level in categorizing the risk stratification of bone tumors and informing patient management, with histological grades used as the reference standard.

Advances in knowledge: The OT-RIMS category reliably stratifies bone tumors into four categories corresponding to histological grades and standardized patient management.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
实施新的孤立性骨肿瘤分类和分层系统:骨肿瘤放射学和解释及管理系统(OT-RIMS)。
目的:提出基于组织学分级的骨肿瘤放射学解释和管理系统(OT-RIMS),简化骨肿瘤的放射学评估,将主要放射学特征分为严重程度等级,并为相应的患者管理行动提供依据:这项2015年1月至2022年8月间的回顾性研究评估了经病理学和影像学随访证实的单发骨肿瘤患者,这些患者接受了两种或三种影像学模式的X光片、CT或MRI检查。三位放射科医生独立评估放射学特征,根据 OT-RIMS 标准对骨病变进行分类,并达成共识。计算卡帕统计量和观察到的一致性:共纳入 341 例患者(平均年龄 26.0 岁,女性 159 例),其中恶性骨病变 102 例,良性骨病变 177 例,中度或低度恶性骨病变 62 例。读者 1、2 和 3 在 OT-RIMS 4 中识别恶性肿瘤的灵敏度和特异性分别为 93.1%(102 人中的 95 人)和 93.3%(239 人中的 223 人)、96.1%(102 人中的 98 人)和 91.6%(239 人中的 219 人)、92.2%(102 人中的 94 人)和 89.5%(239 人中的 214 人)。三位读者的 OT-RIMS 类别读数一致性极佳(Kendall's W = 0.924,p 结论:OT-RIMS 类别的读数一致性极佳:尽管读者的专业知识水平不同,OT-RIMS 类别在对骨肿瘤进行风险分层分类和为患者管理提供信息方面仍表现出极佳的可重复性,组织学分级被用作参考标准:OT-RIMS类别能可靠地将骨肿瘤分为与组织学分级相对应的四个类别,并对患者进行标准化管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
British Journal of Radiology
British Journal of Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.80%
发文量
330
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: BJR is the international research journal of the British Institute of Radiology and is the oldest scientific journal in the field of radiology and related sciences. Dating back to 1896, BJR’s history is radiology’s history, and the journal has featured some landmark papers such as the first description of Computed Tomography "Computerized transverse axial tomography" by Godfrey Hounsfield in 1973. A valuable historical resource, the complete BJR archive has been digitized from 1896. Quick Facts: - 2015 Impact Factor – 1.840 - Receipt to first decision – average of 6 weeks - Acceptance to online publication – average of 3 weeks - ISSN: 0007-1285 - eISSN: 1748-880X Open Access option
期刊最新文献
Calculating Optic Nerve Planning Organ at Risk Volume Margins for Stereotactic Radiosurgery Using Optic Nerve Motion determined using MRI. Paediatric magnetoencephalography and its role in neurodevelopmental disorders. Role of contrast-enhanced mammogram as an adjunct to tomosynthesis in evaluation of circumscribed breast lesions. Acceptance and results of cryoablation for the treatment of early breast cancer in non-surgical patients. Preoperative imaging of colorectal liver metastases: what the radiologist and the multidisciplinary team need to know.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1