Prophylactic Effect of Aspirin and Other Medicine on Cerebral Infarction for Patients with Cardiovascular Diseases Risk Factors: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Cardiology in Review Pub Date : 2024-09-10 DOI:10.1097/CRD.0000000000000778
Binfei Gong, Weijiang Ye
{"title":"Prophylactic Effect of Aspirin and Other Medicine on Cerebral Infarction for Patients with Cardiovascular Diseases Risk Factors: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Binfei Gong, Weijiang Ye","doi":"10.1097/CRD.0000000000000778","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Stroke, as a type of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and cerebrovascular disease, has the risk of causing death or disability in patients. Aspirin, as an antipyretic and analgesic drug, can also treat or prevent CVDs. Previous studies have had conflicting results on the preventive effect of aspirin on cerebral infarction for patients with CVD risk factors. This review was carried out through a meticulous search of the Web of Science and PubMed databases. Articles were included or excluded based on predefined criteria. In terms of heterogeneity, a fixed effect model was utilized when I2 was less than 50%. Conversely, if the studies were deemed clinically comparable, a random effect model was implemented. The findings suggest that medical intervention significantly mitigates the risk of cerebral infarction in patients predisposed to CVDs [odds ratio (OR), 0.85; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.74-0.98; P = 0.03]. Interestingly, the preventive efficacy of medication appears to be higher in men (OR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.72-0.94; P = 0.004) than in women (OR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.69-1.01; P = 0.06). However, in terms of stroke prevention, no significant difference was observed between the use of aspirin (OR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.76-1.06; P = 0.19) and other medications (OR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.31-1.38; P = 0.26).</p>","PeriodicalId":9549,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology in Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiology in Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CRD.0000000000000778","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Stroke, as a type of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and cerebrovascular disease, has the risk of causing death or disability in patients. Aspirin, as an antipyretic and analgesic drug, can also treat or prevent CVDs. Previous studies have had conflicting results on the preventive effect of aspirin on cerebral infarction for patients with CVD risk factors. This review was carried out through a meticulous search of the Web of Science and PubMed databases. Articles were included or excluded based on predefined criteria. In terms of heterogeneity, a fixed effect model was utilized when I2 was less than 50%. Conversely, if the studies were deemed clinically comparable, a random effect model was implemented. The findings suggest that medical intervention significantly mitigates the risk of cerebral infarction in patients predisposed to CVDs [odds ratio (OR), 0.85; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.74-0.98; P = 0.03]. Interestingly, the preventive efficacy of medication appears to be higher in men (OR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.72-0.94; P = 0.004) than in women (OR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.69-1.01; P = 0.06). However, in terms of stroke prevention, no significant difference was observed between the use of aspirin (OR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.76-1.06; P = 0.19) and other medications (OR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.31-1.38; P = 0.26).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阿司匹林和其他药物对心血管疾病危险因素患者脑梗塞的预防效果:系统回顾与元分析》。
中风是心血管疾病(CVD)和脑血管疾病的一种,有导致患者死亡或残疾的风险。阿司匹林作为一种解热镇痛药,也可以治疗或预防心血管疾病。以往的研究对于阿司匹林对有心血管疾病危险因素的患者的脑梗塞预防效果结果不一。本综述通过对 Web of Science 和 PubMed 数据库进行细致的检索而完成。根据预先设定的标准对文章进行了纳入或排除。就异质性而言,如果 I2 小于 50%,则采用固定效应模型。相反,如果研究被认为具有临床可比性,则采用随机效应模型。研究结果表明,医疗干预能明显降低易患心血管疾病的患者发生脑梗塞的风险[几率比(OR),0.85;95% 置信区间(CI),0.74-0.98;P = 0.03]。有趣的是,药物治疗对男性的预防效果(OR,0.82;95% CI,0.72-0.94;P = 0.004)似乎高于女性(OR,0.84;95% CI,0.69-1.01;P = 0.06)。然而,在预防中风方面,使用阿司匹林(OR,0.90;95% CI,0.76-1.06;P = 0.19)和使用其他药物(OR,0.65;95% CI,0.31-1.38;P = 0.26)之间没有观察到明显差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cardiology in Review
Cardiology in Review CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
76
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The mission of Cardiology in Review is to publish reviews on topics of current interest in cardiology that will foster increased understanding of the pathogenesis, diagnosis, clinical course, prevention, and treatment of cardiovascular disorders. Articles of the highest quality are written by authorities in the field and published promptly in a readable format with visual appeal
期刊最新文献
Efficacy of Sentinel Cerebral Embolic Protection Device in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials and Propensity Score-Matched Studies. Antithrombotic Strategies After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients Without an Indication of Oral Anticoagulants: A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Cardiovascular Manifestations of Pseudoxanthoma Elasticum: Pathophysiology, Management, and Research. Curbside Consults Salt-Free Potassium-Enriched Substitute Versus Salt-Free Diet in Hypertension: Which Is Better? Coronary Artery Anomalies: Diagnosis & Management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1