Si Jian Hui, Naresh Kumar, Cherie Lin Hui Tan, Eugene Chua Khye Gin, James Thomas Patrick Decourcy Hallinan, Yiong Huak Chan, Karuna Sree, Jiong Hao Tan
{"title":"AB078. Patterns of treatment delay in patients with symptomatic metastatic epidural spinal cord compression.","authors":"Si Jian Hui, Naresh Kumar, Cherie Lin Hui Tan, Eugene Chua Khye Gin, James Thomas Patrick Decourcy Hallinan, Yiong Huak Chan, Karuna Sree, Jiong Hao Tan","doi":"10.21037/cco-24-ab078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Delayed treatment in symptomatic metastatic epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC) is significantly associated with poorer functional outcomes. In this study, we aim to identify the patterns of treatment delay in patients and factors predictive of postoperative ambulatory function.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective review of patients with symptomatic MESCC treated surgically between January 2015 and January 2022. MESCC symptoms were categorized into symptoms suggesting cord compression requiring immediate referral and symptoms suggestive of spinal metastases. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify factors predictive of postoperative ambulatory function. Delays in treatment were identified and categorized into patient delay (onset of symptoms till initial medical consultation), diagnostic delay (medical consultation till radiological diagnosis of MESCC), referral delay (from diagnosis till spine surgeon review) and surgical delay (from spine surgeon review till surgery) and compared between patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred and seventy-eight patients were identified. In this cohort 92 (52.0%) patients were able to ambulate independently, and 86 (48.3%) patients were non independent. One hundred and thirty-nine (78.1%) of patients had symptoms of cord compression and 93 (52.3%) had neurological deficits on presentation. On multivariate analysis, pre-operative neurological deficits (P=0.01) and symptoms of cord compression (P=0.01) were significantly associated with post-operative ambulatory function. Mean total delay was 66 days, patient delay was 41 days, diagnostic delay was 16 days, referral delay was 3 days and surgical delay was 6 days. In patients with neurological deficits, there was a significant decrease in all forms of treatment delay (P<0.05). There was no significant decrease in patient delay, diagnostic delay and referral delay in patients with symptoms of cord compression.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both patients and physicians understand the need for urgent surgical treatment of MESCC with neurological deficits, however there is still a need for increased education and recognition of the symptoms of MESCC.</p>","PeriodicalId":9945,"journal":{"name":"Chinese clinical oncology","volume":"13 Suppl 1","pages":"AB078"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese clinical oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/cco-24-ab078","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Delayed treatment in symptomatic metastatic epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC) is significantly associated with poorer functional outcomes. In this study, we aim to identify the patterns of treatment delay in patients and factors predictive of postoperative ambulatory function.
Methods: Retrospective review of patients with symptomatic MESCC treated surgically between January 2015 and January 2022. MESCC symptoms were categorized into symptoms suggesting cord compression requiring immediate referral and symptoms suggestive of spinal metastases. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify factors predictive of postoperative ambulatory function. Delays in treatment were identified and categorized into patient delay (onset of symptoms till initial medical consultation), diagnostic delay (medical consultation till radiological diagnosis of MESCC), referral delay (from diagnosis till spine surgeon review) and surgical delay (from spine surgeon review till surgery) and compared between patients.
Results: One hundred and seventy-eight patients were identified. In this cohort 92 (52.0%) patients were able to ambulate independently, and 86 (48.3%) patients were non independent. One hundred and thirty-nine (78.1%) of patients had symptoms of cord compression and 93 (52.3%) had neurological deficits on presentation. On multivariate analysis, pre-operative neurological deficits (P=0.01) and symptoms of cord compression (P=0.01) were significantly associated with post-operative ambulatory function. Mean total delay was 66 days, patient delay was 41 days, diagnostic delay was 16 days, referral delay was 3 days and surgical delay was 6 days. In patients with neurological deficits, there was a significant decrease in all forms of treatment delay (P<0.05). There was no significant decrease in patient delay, diagnostic delay and referral delay in patients with symptoms of cord compression.
Conclusions: Both patients and physicians understand the need for urgent surgical treatment of MESCC with neurological deficits, however there is still a need for increased education and recognition of the symptoms of MESCC.
期刊介绍:
The Chinese Clinical Oncology (Print ISSN 2304-3865; Online ISSN 2304-3873; Chin Clin Oncol; CCO) publishes articles that describe new findings in the field of oncology, and provides current and practical information on diagnosis, prevention and clinical investigations of cancer. Specific areas of interest include, but are not limited to: multimodality therapy, biomarkers, imaging, tumor biology, pathology, chemoprevention, and technical advances related to cancer. The aim of the Journal is to provide a forum for the dissemination of original research articles as well as review articles in all areas related to cancer. It is an international, peer-reviewed journal with a focus on cutting-edge findings in this rapidly changing field. To that end, Chin Clin Oncol is dedicated to translating the latest research developments into best multimodality practice. The journal features a distinguished editorial board, which brings together a team of highly experienced specialists in cancer treatment and research. The diverse experience of the board members allows our editorial panel to lend their expertise to a broad spectrum of cancer subjects.