AB079. Whole-brain radiotherapy versus high dose chemotherapy with autologous stem-cell transplantation for consolidation therapy in primary central nervous system lymphoma.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Chinese clinical oncology Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI:10.21037/cco-24-ab079
Denny Handoyo Kirana, Felix Wijovi, Vanessa Angelica, Fernando Dharmaraja, Julius July
{"title":"AB079. Whole-brain radiotherapy versus high dose chemotherapy with autologous stem-cell transplantation for consolidation therapy in primary central nervous system lymphoma.","authors":"Denny Handoyo Kirana, Felix Wijovi, Vanessa Angelica, Fernando Dharmaraja, Julius July","doi":"10.21037/cco-24-ab079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) is commonly used as consolidation therapy in primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL). However, high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (HD-ASCT) has emerged as an alternative approach for PCNSL. This systematic review aims to assess the efficacy and safety of both treatment modalities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The systematic review follows PRISMA guidelines. A comprehensive search strategy identified relevant studies from PubMed, Europe PMC, and Cochrane Library. The following search terms were used: \"primary central nervous system lymphoma\", \"Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation\", and \"whole-brain radiotherapy\". We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) cohort studies evaluating the use of whole-brain radiotherapy and high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation in the treatment of histologically-confirmed PCNSL. Publications included were limited to English language full texts that were published in the past 10 years. Data extraction & manuscript quality assessment was done by two independent reviewers with a third reviewer to resolve any discrepancy. Primary outcomes include overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) & treatment related toxicity (TRT). Secondary outcomes were clinical neurological function and performance score assessments. Individual studies were assessed using the Jadad Scale and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for observational studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 5 studies, consisting of 2 RCTs and 3 cohort studies. After all studies considered, analysis revealed that consolidation therapy with HD-ASCT had a better overall PFS and OS compared to whole-brain radiotherapy (P<0.005). Both groups showed similar TRT with mostly haematological toxicity. Holistically clinical cognitive functions are found to be improved in HD-ASCT Patients and poorer results are exhibited by WBRT patients primarily in executive functions. Performance statuses are scored differently across all studies with slightly preferable results shown in patients treated with HDC-ASCT.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Based on the findings of this systematic review, HDC-ASCT might be a preferable choice of consolidative therapy as shown with better OS, PFS with similar TRT. While WBRT are more feasible and cost-efficient, risks of cognitive impairment and reduced performance status after WBRT should be considered for further treatment choices. Further randomized clinical trials with a similar scoring system are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":9945,"journal":{"name":"Chinese clinical oncology","volume":"13 Suppl 1","pages":"AB079"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese clinical oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/cco-24-ab079","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) is commonly used as consolidation therapy in primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL). However, high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (HD-ASCT) has emerged as an alternative approach for PCNSL. This systematic review aims to assess the efficacy and safety of both treatment modalities.

Methods: The systematic review follows PRISMA guidelines. A comprehensive search strategy identified relevant studies from PubMed, Europe PMC, and Cochrane Library. The following search terms were used: "primary central nervous system lymphoma", "Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation", and "whole-brain radiotherapy". We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) cohort studies evaluating the use of whole-brain radiotherapy and high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation in the treatment of histologically-confirmed PCNSL. Publications included were limited to English language full texts that were published in the past 10 years. Data extraction & manuscript quality assessment was done by two independent reviewers with a third reviewer to resolve any discrepancy. Primary outcomes include overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) & treatment related toxicity (TRT). Secondary outcomes were clinical neurological function and performance score assessments. Individual studies were assessed using the Jadad Scale and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for observational studies.

Results: We identified 5 studies, consisting of 2 RCTs and 3 cohort studies. After all studies considered, analysis revealed that consolidation therapy with HD-ASCT had a better overall PFS and OS compared to whole-brain radiotherapy (P<0.005). Both groups showed similar TRT with mostly haematological toxicity. Holistically clinical cognitive functions are found to be improved in HD-ASCT Patients and poorer results are exhibited by WBRT patients primarily in executive functions. Performance statuses are scored differently across all studies with slightly preferable results shown in patients treated with HDC-ASCT.

Conclusions: Based on the findings of this systematic review, HDC-ASCT might be a preferable choice of consolidative therapy as shown with better OS, PFS with similar TRT. While WBRT are more feasible and cost-efficient, risks of cognitive impairment and reduced performance status after WBRT should be considered for further treatment choices. Further randomized clinical trials with a similar scoring system are needed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
AB079.原发性中枢神经系统淋巴瘤的全脑放疗与大剂量化疗联合自体干细胞移植的巩固治疗对比研究
背景:全脑放疗(WBRT)通常用作原发性中枢神经系统淋巴瘤(PCNSL)的巩固治疗。然而,高剂量化疗后进行自体干细胞移植(HD-ASCT)已成为治疗原发性中枢神经系统淋巴瘤的另一种方法。本系统综述旨在评估这两种治疗方式的有效性和安全性:本系统综述遵循 PRISMA 指南。综合检索策略从 PubMed、Europe PMC 和 Cochrane Library 中找到了相关研究。检索词如下"原发性中枢神经系统淋巴瘤"、"自体干细胞移植 "和 "全脑放疗"。我们纳入了评估全脑放疗和大剂量化疗后自体干细胞移植用于治疗组织学确诊的 PCNSL 的随机对照试验(RCT)队列研究。收录的文献仅限于过去 10 年内发表的英文全文。数据提取和稿件质量评估由两名独立审稿人完成,并由第三名审稿人解决任何差异。主要结果包括总生存期(OS)、无进展生存期(PFS)和治疗相关毒性(TRT)。次要结果为临床神经功能和表现评分评估。采用贾达德量表(Jadad Scale)和纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表(Newcastle-Ottawa Scale)对观察性研究进行评估:我们确定了 5 项研究,包括 2 项 RCT 研究和 3 项队列研究。对所有研究进行分析后发现,与全脑放疗(PConclusions:根据本系统综述的研究结果,HDC-ASCT可能是一种更可取的巩固治疗选择,因为它具有更好的OS、PFS和相似的TRT。虽然 WBRT 更为可行且更具成本效益,但在进一步选择治疗方案时应考虑 WBRT 后认知功能障碍和表现状态下降的风险。还需要采用类似的评分系统进一步开展随机临床试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Chinese Clinical Oncology (Print ISSN 2304-3865; Online ISSN 2304-3873; Chin Clin Oncol; CCO) publishes articles that describe new findings in the field of oncology, and provides current and practical information on diagnosis, prevention and clinical investigations of cancer. Specific areas of interest include, but are not limited to: multimodality therapy, biomarkers, imaging, tumor biology, pathology, chemoprevention, and technical advances related to cancer. The aim of the Journal is to provide a forum for the dissemination of original research articles as well as review articles in all areas related to cancer. It is an international, peer-reviewed journal with a focus on cutting-edge findings in this rapidly changing field. To that end, Chin Clin Oncol is dedicated to translating the latest research developments into best multimodality practice. The journal features a distinguished editorial board, which brings together a team of highly experienced specialists in cancer treatment and research. The diverse experience of the board members allows our editorial panel to lend their expertise to a broad spectrum of cancer subjects.
期刊最新文献
Intriguing future: single-site robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy. A periungual eccrine poroma masquerading as amelanotic melanoma: a case report. Immunotherapy resistance in colorectal cancer with liver metastases: challenges & therapeutic advances. Artificial intelligence assistance during upper endoscopy: a game changer in detection of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma? Befotertinib in first-line treatment for Chinese non-small cell lung cancer patients harboring common EGFR-mutations reveals similar efficacy to other third-generation EGFR-TKIs but somewhat different safety profile.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1