Surgical resection versus stereotactic radiosurgery for the treatment of brain metastases in the motor cortex; a meta-analysis and systematic review.

IF 4.2 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Clinical & Experimental Metastasis Pub Date : 2024-09-20 DOI:10.1007/s10585-024-10311-4
Dong-Won Shin, Gi-Taek Yee
{"title":"Surgical resection versus stereotactic radiosurgery for the treatment of brain metastases in the motor cortex; a meta-analysis and systematic review.","authors":"Dong-Won Shin, Gi-Taek Yee","doi":"10.1007/s10585-024-10311-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Brain metastasis in the motor cortex is a challenging condition to treat. Surgical resection or stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS)/hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (hypoSRT) are valuable options up to now. Due to its unique location and potential for neurologic deficits, neither treatment is entirely satisfactory. There is still a lack of data on the treatment result of motor cortex metastasis. This study provides a comprehensive review and meta-analysis comparing surgery and SRS/hypoSRT for treating brain metastasis in the motor cortex. Core databases, including PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library, were systematically searched for brain metastasis in the motor cortex, demonstrating the clinical outcomes of both surgery and SRS/hypoSRT. Motor power outcome and treatment-associated complication rates were thoroughly evaluated. Twenty-five articles were listed for full-text review. Among them, 13 articles were eligible for inclusion criteria: retrospective cohort studies comparing surgery and SRS/hypoSRT. There are 323 patients in the surgery group and 220 in the SRS/hypoSRT group. The motor outcome is better in surgery group, but without statistical significance (0.49 vs 0.37, p = 0.3937) and treatment-related complication is lower in surgery group with statistical significance (0.09 vs 0.26, p = 0.0218). Treatment modality should be tailored by the patient's performance status, history of radiation, presence of ongoing chemotherapy, or extracranial progression status.</p>","PeriodicalId":10267,"journal":{"name":"Clinical & Experimental Metastasis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical & Experimental Metastasis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10585-024-10311-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Brain metastasis in the motor cortex is a challenging condition to treat. Surgical resection or stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS)/hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (hypoSRT) are valuable options up to now. Due to its unique location and potential for neurologic deficits, neither treatment is entirely satisfactory. There is still a lack of data on the treatment result of motor cortex metastasis. This study provides a comprehensive review and meta-analysis comparing surgery and SRS/hypoSRT for treating brain metastasis in the motor cortex. Core databases, including PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library, were systematically searched for brain metastasis in the motor cortex, demonstrating the clinical outcomes of both surgery and SRS/hypoSRT. Motor power outcome and treatment-associated complication rates were thoroughly evaluated. Twenty-five articles were listed for full-text review. Among them, 13 articles were eligible for inclusion criteria: retrospective cohort studies comparing surgery and SRS/hypoSRT. There are 323 patients in the surgery group and 220 in the SRS/hypoSRT group. The motor outcome is better in surgery group, but without statistical significance (0.49 vs 0.37, p = 0.3937) and treatment-related complication is lower in surgery group with statistical significance (0.09 vs 0.26, p = 0.0218). Treatment modality should be tailored by the patient's performance status, history of radiation, presence of ongoing chemotherapy, or extracranial progression status.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
治疗运动皮层脑转移瘤的手术切除与立体定向放射外科手术;荟萃分析与系统综述。
运动皮层脑转移瘤的治疗具有挑战性。迄今为止,手术切除或立体定向放射手术(SRS)/低分次立体定向放射治疗(hypoSRT)是有价值的选择。由于其独特的位置和潜在的神经功能缺损,这两种治疗方法都不能令人完全满意。关于运动皮层转移的治疗效果,目前仍缺乏相关数据。本研究对手术和 SRS/hypoSRT 治疗运动皮层脑转移瘤进行了全面回顾和荟萃分析。研究人员在PubMed、Embase和Cochrane图书馆等核心数据库中对运动皮层脑转移进行了系统检索,结果显示了手术和SRS/hypoSRT的临床疗效。对运动能力结果和治疗相关并发症发生率进行了全面评估。25篇文章被列入全文综述。其中13篇符合纳入标准:比较手术和SRS/hypoSRT的回顾性队列研究。手术组有 323 名患者,SRS/hypoSRT 组有 220 名患者。手术组的运动结果更好,但无统计学意义(0.49 vs 0.37,P = 0.3937),手术组的治疗相关并发症更低,有统计学意义(0.09 vs 0.26,P = 0.0218)。治疗方式应根据患者的表现状况、放射治疗史、是否正在接受化疗或颅外进展状况来确定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
5.00%
发文量
55
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: The Journal''s scope encompasses all aspects of metastasis research, whether laboratory-based, experimental or clinical and therapeutic. It covers such areas as molecular biology, pharmacology, tumor biology, and clinical cancer treatment (with all its subdivisions of surgery, chemotherapy and radio-therapy as well as pathology and epidemiology) insofar as these disciplines are concerned with the Journal''s core subject of metastasis formation, prevention and treatment.
期刊最新文献
Disrupting CENP-N mediated SEPT9 methylation as a strategy to inhibit aerobic glycolysis and liver metastasis in colorectal cancer. Downregulation of hsa_circ_0006620 inhibits the malignant progression of prostate cancer by regulation of the miR-502-3p/HK2 axis mediated by aerobic glycolysis. Lymph nodes in oral squamous cell carcinoma: a comprehensive anatomical perspective. The movement of mitochondria in breast cancer: internal motility and intercellular transfer of mitochondria. Transcriptomic characterization of the histopathological growth patterns in breast cancer liver metastases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1