Radiotherapy Trends and Variations in Invasive Non-metastatic Breast Cancer Treatment in the Netherlands: A Nationwide Overview From 2008 to 2019.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Clinical oncology Pub Date : 2024-08-22 DOI:10.1016/j.clon.2024.08.010
J Evers, M J C van der Sangen, M C van Maaren, J H Maduro, L Strobbe, M J Aarts, M C W M Bloemers, D H J G van den Bongard, H Struikmans, S Siesling
{"title":"Radiotherapy Trends and Variations in Invasive Non-metastatic Breast Cancer Treatment in the Netherlands: A Nationwide Overview From 2008 to 2019.","authors":"J Evers, M J C van der Sangen, M C van Maaren, J H Maduro, L Strobbe, M J Aarts, M C W M Bloemers, D H J G van den Bongard, H Struikmans, S Siesling","doi":"10.1016/j.clon.2024.08.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>This nationwide study provides an overview of trends and variations in radiotherapy use as part of multimodal treatment of invasive non-metastatic breast cancer in the Netherlands in 2008-2019.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Women with invasive non-metastatic breast cancer were selected from the population-based Netherlands Cancer Registry. Treatments trends were presented over time. Factors associated with (1) boost irradiation in breast-conserving therapy and (2) regional radiotherapy instead of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in N+ disease were identified using multilevel logistic regression analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Radiotherapy use increased from 61% (2008) to 70% (2016), caused by breast-conserving therapy instead of mastectomy, increased post-mastectomy radiotherapy, and increased regional radiotherapy (32% in 2011 to 61% in 2019) instead of ALND in N+ disease. Omission of radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) in 2016-2019 (4-9%, respectively), mainly in elderly, decreased overall radiotherapy use to 67%. Radiotherapy treatment was further de-escalated by decreased boost irradiation in breast-conserving therapy (66% in 2011 to 37% in 2019) and partial (1% in 2011 to 6% in 2019) instead of whole breast irradiation following BCS. Boost irradiation was associated with high-risk features: younger age (OR>75 vs <50:0.04, 95%CI:0.03-0.05), higher grade (OR grade III vs I:11.46, 95%CI:9.90-13.26) and residual disease (OR focal residual vs R0-resection:28.08, 95%CI:23.07-34.17). Variation across the country was found for both boost irradiation use (OR South vs North:0.58, 95%CI:0.49-0.68), and regional radiotherapy instead of ALND (OR Southwest vs North:0.55, 95%CI:0.37-0.80).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Overall radiotherapy use increased in 2008-2016, while a decreasing trend was observed after 2016, caused by post-BCS radiotherapy omission. Boost irradiation in breast-conserving therapy became omitted in low-risk patients, and regional radiotherapy use increased as an alternative for ALND in N+ disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":10403,"journal":{"name":"Clinical oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clon.2024.08.010","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: This nationwide study provides an overview of trends and variations in radiotherapy use as part of multimodal treatment of invasive non-metastatic breast cancer in the Netherlands in 2008-2019.

Materials and methods: Women with invasive non-metastatic breast cancer were selected from the population-based Netherlands Cancer Registry. Treatments trends were presented over time. Factors associated with (1) boost irradiation in breast-conserving therapy and (2) regional radiotherapy instead of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in N+ disease were identified using multilevel logistic regression analyses.

Results: Radiotherapy use increased from 61% (2008) to 70% (2016), caused by breast-conserving therapy instead of mastectomy, increased post-mastectomy radiotherapy, and increased regional radiotherapy (32% in 2011 to 61% in 2019) instead of ALND in N+ disease. Omission of radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) in 2016-2019 (4-9%, respectively), mainly in elderly, decreased overall radiotherapy use to 67%. Radiotherapy treatment was further de-escalated by decreased boost irradiation in breast-conserving therapy (66% in 2011 to 37% in 2019) and partial (1% in 2011 to 6% in 2019) instead of whole breast irradiation following BCS. Boost irradiation was associated with high-risk features: younger age (OR>75 vs <50:0.04, 95%CI:0.03-0.05), higher grade (OR grade III vs I:11.46, 95%CI:9.90-13.26) and residual disease (OR focal residual vs R0-resection:28.08, 95%CI:23.07-34.17). Variation across the country was found for both boost irradiation use (OR South vs North:0.58, 95%CI:0.49-0.68), and regional radiotherapy instead of ALND (OR Southwest vs North:0.55, 95%CI:0.37-0.80).

Conclusion: Overall radiotherapy use increased in 2008-2016, while a decreasing trend was observed after 2016, caused by post-BCS radiotherapy omission. Boost irradiation in breast-conserving therapy became omitted in low-risk patients, and regional radiotherapy use increased as an alternative for ALND in N+ disease.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
荷兰侵袭性非转移性乳腺癌放疗趋势与变化:2008年至2019年全国概况》。
目的:这项全国性研究概述了 2008-2019 年荷兰侵袭性非转移乳腺癌多模式治疗中放疗使用的趋势和变化:材料和方法:从荷兰癌症登记处人群中选取患有浸润性非转移性乳腺癌的妇女。治疗趋势随时间变化。通过多层次逻辑回归分析,确定了与(1)保乳治疗中的增强照射和(2)N+疾病中的区域放疗而非腋窝淋巴结清扫(ALND)相关的因素:放疗使用率从61%(2008年)上升到70%(2016年),原因是保乳治疗取代了乳房切除术,乳房切除术后放疗增加,N+疾病中区域放疗(2011年为32%,2019年为61%)取代ALND增加。2016-2019年,保乳手术(BCS)后放弃放疗的比例(分别为4%-9%),主要是老年人,放疗的总体使用率降至67%。由于保乳治疗中的增强照射减少(2011年为66%,2019年为37%),以及BCS术后部分照射(2011年为1%,2019年为6%)取代全乳照射,放疗治疗进一步降级。增强照射与高风险特征有关:年龄较小(OR>75 vs 结论:增强照射与高风险特征有关:2008-2016年期间,放疗的总体使用率有所上升,而2016年后出现下降趋势,原因是BCS术后放弃了放疗。低危患者在保乳治疗中省略了增强照射,而在N+疾病中,区域放疗作为ALND的替代疗法,使用率有所增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical oncology
Clinical oncology 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
8.80%
发文量
332
审稿时长
40 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Oncology is an International cancer journal covering all aspects of the clinical management of cancer patients, reflecting a multidisciplinary approach to therapy. Papers, editorials and reviews are published on all types of malignant disease embracing, pathology, diagnosis and treatment, including radiotherapy, chemotherapy, surgery, combined modality treatment and palliative care. Research and review papers covering epidemiology, radiobiology, radiation physics, tumour biology, and immunology are also published, together with letters to the editor, case reports and book reviews.
期刊最新文献
PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitors in Combination With Chemo or as Monotherapy vs. Chemotherapy Alone in Advanced, Unresectable HER2-Negative Gastric, Gastroesophageal Junction, and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma: A Meta-Analysis. "If You're Talking, I Think You're Muted": Follow-up Analysis of Weekly Peer Review Discussion and Plan Changes After Transitioning From Virtual to In-Person Format. The Current use of Adaptive Strategies for External Beam Radiotherapy in Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review. The Use of Artificial Intelligence Technologies in Cancer Care. Response Letter to Laurelli et al. Letter to the Editor Regarding Enhancing Telemedicine to Improve Global Radiotherapy Access.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1