Effect of the "aSSKINg" Model in Reducing Pressure Ulcer Risk: A Comparative Study Using the Braden Risk Assessment Score.

IF 1 Q4 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Critical Care Nursing Quarterly Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-13 DOI:10.1097/CNQ.0000000000000520
Ghada Shalaby Khalaf Mahran, Nada Ahmed Mohamed Ahmed, Mohamed Hassan Bakri, Mervet Anwar Abdel Aziz
{"title":"Effect of the \"aSSKINg\" Model in Reducing Pressure Ulcer Risk: A Comparative Study Using the Braden Risk Assessment Score.","authors":"Ghada Shalaby Khalaf Mahran, Nada Ahmed Mohamed Ahmed, Mohamed Hassan Bakri, Mervet Anwar Abdel Aziz","doi":"10.1097/CNQ.0000000000000520","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pressure ulcer is considered a common and costly problem in the care of patients. Prevention and management of pressure ulcer are very important due to the high cost of treatment and the adverse consequences of pressure ulcer. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of implementing \"aSSKINg\" model in reducing pressure ulcer risk. This study used a before- and after-intervention quasi-experimental design. This study was performed on 60 patients who were not randomly selected and assigned in to control and study group. The data collection tool was a 3-part sheet (Braden scale, skin health assessment, and Pressure ulcer assessment). The incidence of pressure ulcer was 19 (60.0%) in the control group versus 9 (30.0%) in the study group with statistical significant differences. The most common site of pressure ulcer was coccyx (6 [31.6%]) in the control group and Heel (3 [33.3%]) in the study group. The application of \"aSSKINg\" model in the patients with pressure ulcers is effective in reducing the incidence and severity of pressure ulcers.</p>","PeriodicalId":10789,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Nursing Quarterly","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care Nursing Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CNQ.0000000000000520","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pressure ulcer is considered a common and costly problem in the care of patients. Prevention and management of pressure ulcer are very important due to the high cost of treatment and the adverse consequences of pressure ulcer. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of implementing "aSSKINg" model in reducing pressure ulcer risk. This study used a before- and after-intervention quasi-experimental design. This study was performed on 60 patients who were not randomly selected and assigned in to control and study group. The data collection tool was a 3-part sheet (Braden scale, skin health assessment, and Pressure ulcer assessment). The incidence of pressure ulcer was 19 (60.0%) in the control group versus 9 (30.0%) in the study group with statistical significant differences. The most common site of pressure ulcer was coccyx (6 [31.6%]) in the control group and Heel (3 [33.3%]) in the study group. The application of "aSSKINg" model in the patients with pressure ulcers is effective in reducing the incidence and severity of pressure ulcers.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
aSSKINg "模型在降低压疮风险方面的效果:使用布莱登风险评估分数的比较研究。
压疮被认为是病人护理过程中一个常见且代价高昂的问题。由于压疮的治疗费用高昂且后果严重,因此压疮的预防和管理非常重要。本研究旨在评估实施 "aSSKINg "模式在降低压疮风险方面的效果。本研究采用了干预前后的准实验设计。研究对象为 60 名患者,他们并未被随机选入对照组和研究组。数据收集工具由三部分组成(布莱登量表、皮肤健康评估和压疮评估)。对照组和研究组的压疮发生率分别为 19 例(60.0%)和 9 例(30.0%),差异具有统计学意义。对照组最常见的压疮部位是尾骨(6 [31.6%]),而研究组则是脚跟(3 [33.3%])。在压疮患者中应用 "aSSKINg "模式可有效降低压疮的发生率和严重程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Critical Care Nursing Quarterly
Critical Care Nursing Quarterly CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
76
期刊介绍: Critical Care Nursing Quarterly (CCNQ) is a peer-reviewed journal that provides current practice-oriented information for the continuing education and improved clinical practice of critical care professionals, including nurses, physicians, and allied health care professionals.
期刊最新文献
Analysis of Nurses' Perceptions of Handover Practices: A Comparative Study in Different Medical Settings. Care Bundle Approach for Oral Health Maintenance and Reduction of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia. Cryoanalgesia for Reducing Unconscious Patients' Pain During Arterial Puncture. Developing and Validating a Bundle for Safe Intra-Hospital Transporting of the Critically Ill Patients: Mixed Qualitative Design With Delphi Approach. Effect of the "aSSKINg" Model in Reducing Pressure Ulcer Risk: A Comparative Study Using the Braden Risk Assessment Score.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1