Lymphovascular invasion is a dominant risk factor for lymph node metastasis in T2 rectal cancer.

IF 2.2 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Endoscopy International Open Pub Date : 2024-09-12 eCollection Date: 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1055/a-2405-1117
Selma Medic, Emelie Nilsson, Carl-Fredrik Rönnow, Henrik Thorlacius
{"title":"Lymphovascular invasion is a dominant risk factor for lymph node metastasis in T2 rectal cancer.","authors":"Selma Medic, Emelie Nilsson, Carl-Fredrik Rönnow, Henrik Thorlacius","doi":"10.1055/a-2405-1117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background and study aims</b> Surgical resection is standard treatment of T2 rectal cancer due to risk of concomitant lymph node metastases (LNM). Local resection could potentially be an alternative to surgical treatment in a subgroup of patients with low risk of LNM. The aim of this study was to identify clinical and histopathological risk factors of LNM in T2 rectal cancer. <b>Patients and methods</b> This was a retrospective registry-based population study on prospectively collected data on all patients with T2 rectal cancer undergoing surgical resection in Sweden between 2009 and 2021. Potential risk factors of LNM, including age, gender, resection margin, lymphovascular invasion (LVI), histologic grade, mucinous cancer, and perineural invasion (PNI) were analyzed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression. <b>Results</b> Of 1607 patients, 343 (21%) with T2 rectal cancer had LNM. LVI (odds ratio [OR] = 4.21, <i>P</i> < 0.001) and age < 60 years (OR = 1.80, <i>P</i> < 0.001) were significant and independent risk factors. However, PNI (OR = 1.50, <i>P</i> = 0.15), mucinous cancer (OR = 1.14, <i>P</i> = 0.60), histologic grade (OR = 1.47, <i>P</i> = 0.07) and non-radical resection margin (OR = 1.64, <i>P</i> = 0.38) were not significant risk factors for LNM in multivariate analyses. The incidence of LNM was 15% in the absence of any risk factor. <b>Conclusions</b> This was a large study on LNM in T2 rectal cancer which showed that LVI is the dominant risk factor. Moreover, low age constituted an independent risk factor, whereas gender, resection margin, PNI, histologic grade, and mucinous cancer were not independent risk factors of LNM. Thus, these findings may provide a useful basis for management of patients after local resection of early rectal cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":11671,"journal":{"name":"Endoscopy International Open","volume":"12 9","pages":"E1056-E1062"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11392589/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endoscopy International Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2405-1117","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and study aims Surgical resection is standard treatment of T2 rectal cancer due to risk of concomitant lymph node metastases (LNM). Local resection could potentially be an alternative to surgical treatment in a subgroup of patients with low risk of LNM. The aim of this study was to identify clinical and histopathological risk factors of LNM in T2 rectal cancer. Patients and methods This was a retrospective registry-based population study on prospectively collected data on all patients with T2 rectal cancer undergoing surgical resection in Sweden between 2009 and 2021. Potential risk factors of LNM, including age, gender, resection margin, lymphovascular invasion (LVI), histologic grade, mucinous cancer, and perineural invasion (PNI) were analyzed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression. Results Of 1607 patients, 343 (21%) with T2 rectal cancer had LNM. LVI (odds ratio [OR] = 4.21, P < 0.001) and age < 60 years (OR = 1.80, P < 0.001) were significant and independent risk factors. However, PNI (OR = 1.50, P = 0.15), mucinous cancer (OR = 1.14, P = 0.60), histologic grade (OR = 1.47, P = 0.07) and non-radical resection margin (OR = 1.64, P = 0.38) were not significant risk factors for LNM in multivariate analyses. The incidence of LNM was 15% in the absence of any risk factor. Conclusions This was a large study on LNM in T2 rectal cancer which showed that LVI is the dominant risk factor. Moreover, low age constituted an independent risk factor, whereas gender, resection margin, PNI, histologic grade, and mucinous cancer were not independent risk factors of LNM. Thus, these findings may provide a useful basis for management of patients after local resection of early rectal cancer.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
淋巴管侵犯是 T2 直肠癌淋巴结转移的主要风险因素。
研究背景和目的:手术切除是 T2 直肠癌的标准治疗方法,因为存在并发淋巴结转移(LNM)的风险。在淋巴结转移风险较低的亚组患者中,局部切除术有可能成为手术治疗的替代方案。本研究旨在确定 T2 直肠癌 LNM 的临床和组织病理学风险因素。患者和方法 这是一项以登记为基础的回顾性人群研究,研究对象是前瞻性收集的 2009 年至 2021 年期间在瑞典接受手术切除的所有 T2 直肠癌患者的数据。采用单变量和多变量逻辑回归分析了LNM的潜在风险因素,包括年龄、性别、切除边缘、淋巴管侵犯(LVI)、组织学分级、粘液癌和神经周围侵犯(PNI)。结果 在1607例患者中,343例(21%)T2直肠癌患者患有LNM。LVI(几率比 [OR] = 4.21,P < 0.001)和年龄 < 60 岁(OR = 1.80,P < 0.001)是重要的独立风险因素。然而,在多变量分析中,PNI(OR = 1.50,P = 0.15)、粘液癌(OR = 1.14,P = 0.60)、组织学分级(OR = 1.47,P = 0.07)和非根治性切除边缘(OR = 1.64,P = 0.38)不是LNM的重要危险因素。在没有任何风险因素的情况下,LNM的发生率为15%。结论 这是一项关于 T2 直肠癌 LNM 的大型研究,结果显示 LVI 是主要的风险因素。此外,低龄也是一个独立的风险因素,而性别、切除边缘、PNI、组织学分级和粘液癌并不是 LNM 的独立风险因素。因此,这些发现可为早期直肠癌局部切除术后患者的管理提供有用的依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Endoscopy International Open
Endoscopy International Open GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
自引率
3.80%
发文量
270
期刊最新文献
New cholangiopancreatoscopy-assisted diagnosis of disconnected pancreatic cuct syndrome and bridging disconnected pancreatic duct. Colonoscopy is not mammography: Challenges of applying the Duty of Candor. Complete extraction of main pancreatic duct residual and microstones using an 8-wire basket catheter. Costs and benefits of a formal quality framework for colonoscopy: Economic evaluation. Defining standards for fluoroscopy in gastrointestinal endoscopy using Delphi methodology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1