Repurposing chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy grading

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY European Journal of Neurology Pub Date : 2024-09-16 DOI:10.1111/ene.16457
Roser Velasco, Andreas A. Argyriou, David R. Cornblath, Pere Bruna, Paola Alberti, Emanuela Rossi, Ingemar S. J. Merkies, Dimitri Psimaras, Chiara Briani, Roy I. Lalisang, Angelo Schenone, Guido Cavaletti, Jordi Bruna, CI-PeriNomS Group
{"title":"Repurposing chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy grading","authors":"Roser Velasco,&nbsp;Andreas A. Argyriou,&nbsp;David R. Cornblath,&nbsp;Pere Bruna,&nbsp;Paola Alberti,&nbsp;Emanuela Rossi,&nbsp;Ingemar S. J. Merkies,&nbsp;Dimitri Psimaras,&nbsp;Chiara Briani,&nbsp;Roy I. Lalisang,&nbsp;Angelo Schenone,&nbsp;Guido Cavaletti,&nbsp;Jordi Bruna,&nbsp;CI-PeriNomS Group","doi":"10.1111/ene.16457","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background and Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is perceived differently by patients and physicians, complicating its assessment. Current recommendations advocate combining clinical and patient-reported outcomes measures, but this approach can be challenging in patient care. This multicenter European study aims to bridge the gap between patients' perceptions and neurological impairments by aligning both perspectives to improve treatment decision-making.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Data were pooled from two prospective studies of subjects (<i>n</i> = 372) with established CIPN. Patient and physician views regarding CIPN were assessed using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Total Neuropathy Scale–clinical version (TNSc) items, and the disease-specific quality of life - Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy questionnaire (QLQ-CIPN20) from the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC). To identify inherent neurotoxic severity patterns, we employed hierarchical cluster analysis optimized with k-means clustering and internally validated by discriminant functional analysis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Both NCI-CTCAE and TNSc demonstrated a significant difference in the distribution of severity grades in relation to QLQ-CIPN20 scores. However, a proportion of subjects with different neurotoxic severity grades exhibited overlapping QLQ-CIPN20 scores. We identified three distinct clusters classifying subjects as having severely impaired, intermediately impaired, and mildly impaired CIPN based on TNSc and QLQ-CIPN20 scores. No differences in demographics, cancer type distribution, or class of drug received were observed.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Our results confirm the heterogeneity in CIPN perception between patients and physicians and identify three well-differentiated subgroups of patients delineated by degree of CIPN impairment based on scores derived from TNSc and QLQ-CIPN20. A more refined assessment of CIPN could potentially be achieved using the calculator tool derived from the cluster equations in this study. This tool, which facilitates individual patient classification, requires prospective validation.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":11954,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Neurology","volume":"31 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11554987/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ene.16457","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Purpose

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is perceived differently by patients and physicians, complicating its assessment. Current recommendations advocate combining clinical and patient-reported outcomes measures, but this approach can be challenging in patient care. This multicenter European study aims to bridge the gap between patients' perceptions and neurological impairments by aligning both perspectives to improve treatment decision-making.

Methods

Data were pooled from two prospective studies of subjects (n = 372) with established CIPN. Patient and physician views regarding CIPN were assessed using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Total Neuropathy Scale–clinical version (TNSc) items, and the disease-specific quality of life - Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy questionnaire (QLQ-CIPN20) from the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC). To identify inherent neurotoxic severity patterns, we employed hierarchical cluster analysis optimized with k-means clustering and internally validated by discriminant functional analysis.

Results

Both NCI-CTCAE and TNSc demonstrated a significant difference in the distribution of severity grades in relation to QLQ-CIPN20 scores. However, a proportion of subjects with different neurotoxic severity grades exhibited overlapping QLQ-CIPN20 scores. We identified three distinct clusters classifying subjects as having severely impaired, intermediately impaired, and mildly impaired CIPN based on TNSc and QLQ-CIPN20 scores. No differences in demographics, cancer type distribution, or class of drug received were observed.

Conclusions

Our results confirm the heterogeneity in CIPN perception between patients and physicians and identify three well-differentiated subgroups of patients delineated by degree of CIPN impairment based on scores derived from TNSc and QLQ-CIPN20. A more refined assessment of CIPN could potentially be achieved using the calculator tool derived from the cluster equations in this study. This tool, which facilitates individual patient classification, requires prospective validation.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
化疗诱发的周围神经病变分级的再利用。
背景和目的:患者和医生对化疗引起的周围神经病变(CIPN)有不同的认识,这使其评估变得复杂。目前的建议主张将临床和患者报告的结果测量相结合,但这种方法在患者护理中具有挑战性。这项欧洲多中心研究旨在弥合患者感知与神经损伤之间的差距,将这两种观点统一起来,以改善治疗决策:方法:汇总两项前瞻性研究的数据,研究对象为已确诊的 CIPN 患者(n = 372)。采用美国国家癌症研究所不良事件通用术语标准(NCI-CTCAE)、总神经病变量表临床版(TNSc)项目以及欧洲癌症研究和治疗组织(EORTC)的疾病特异性生活质量--化疗诱发周围神经病变问卷(QLQ-CIPN20)评估患者和医生对CIPN的看法。为了确定固有的神经毒性严重程度模式,我们采用了经 k-means 聚类优化的分层聚类分析,并通过判别功能分析进行了内部验证:结果:NCI-CTCAE 和 TNSc 的严重程度等级分布与 QLQ-CIPN20 评分有显著差异。然而,在不同神经毒性严重程度等级的受试者中,有一部分人的 QLQ-CIPN20 分数是重叠的。根据 TNSc 和 QLQ-CIPN20 评分,我们将受试者分为严重受损、中度受损和轻度受损三个不同的 CIPN 群组。在人口统计学、癌症类型分布或接受的药物类别方面没有观察到差异:我们的研究结果证实了患者和医生对 CIPN 感知的异质性,并根据 TNSc 和 QLQ-CIPN20 得出的分数,按 CIPN 受损程度划分出三个差异明显的患者亚组。使用本研究中根据聚类方程得出的计算工具,有可能对 CIPN 进行更精细的评估。该工具有助于对患者进行个体分类,但需要进行前瞻性验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Neurology
European Journal of Neurology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
2.00%
发文量
418
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Neurology is the official journal of the European Academy of Neurology and covers all areas of clinical and basic research in neurology, including pre-clinical research of immediate translational value for new potential treatments. Emphasis is placed on major diseases of large clinical and socio-economic importance (dementia, stroke, epilepsy, headache, multiple sclerosis, movement disorders, and infectious diseases).
期刊最新文献
Outcomes of cerebrovascular disease in muscular dystrophies: A propensity-matched nationwide analysis. Plasma neuropeptide Y levels and adverse clinical outcomes after acute ischaemic stroke. Spatiotemporal neurodegeneration of the substantia nigra and its connecting cortex and subcortex in Parkinson's disease. Association of left atrial function with vascular brain injury: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities study. Phenotype-genotype correlation in X-linked Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease: A French cohort study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1