Prevalence of Fovea Plana in patients with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY European Journal of Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2024-09-23 DOI:10.1177/11206721241286125
Vasileia Chatzistergiou, Raphaël Lejoyeux, Sophie Bonnin, Ramin Tadayoni
{"title":"Prevalence of Fovea Plana in patients with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment.","authors":"Vasileia Chatzistergiou, Raphaël Lejoyeux, Sophie Bonnin, Ramin Tadayoni","doi":"10.1177/11206721241286125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the prevalence of fovea plana in patients with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment and compare characteristics of the detachment between patients with and without fovea plana.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective, cross-sectional, case-control study included individuals with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. We collected demographics and data on the operated eye, spherical equivalent, best-corrected visual acuity, lens status, macula status, number of retinal holes or tears, and presence of intravitreal hemorrhage, macular hole, epiretinal membrane, posterior vitreous detachment and proliferative vitreoretinopathy. The type of surgery, the tamponade, and cataract surgery following retinal surgery were also recorded. Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography macular cubes were used to evaluate the fovea by using the Spectralis HRA-OCT device (Heidelberg Engineering, Germany). Images were graded by two different investigators and a third investigator in case of disagreement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 204 individuals; 35 (17.2%) had fovea plana, a proportion significantly higher than in the general population (p = 0.041). Individuals with and without fovea plana did not differ in any of the characteristics mentioned above apart from posterior vitreous detachment, which was more frequent in those with than without fovea plana (p = 0.038).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The prevalence of fovea plana is higher in patients with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment, which suggests an association between fovea plana and potential vitreoretinal interface changes.</p>","PeriodicalId":12000,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11206721241286125","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the prevalence of fovea plana in patients with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment and compare characteristics of the detachment between patients with and without fovea plana.

Methods: This retrospective, cross-sectional, case-control study included individuals with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. We collected demographics and data on the operated eye, spherical equivalent, best-corrected visual acuity, lens status, macula status, number of retinal holes or tears, and presence of intravitreal hemorrhage, macular hole, epiretinal membrane, posterior vitreous detachment and proliferative vitreoretinopathy. The type of surgery, the tamponade, and cataract surgery following retinal surgery were also recorded. Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography macular cubes were used to evaluate the fovea by using the Spectralis HRA-OCT device (Heidelberg Engineering, Germany). Images were graded by two different investigators and a third investigator in case of disagreement.

Results: We included 204 individuals; 35 (17.2%) had fovea plana, a proportion significantly higher than in the general population (p = 0.041). Individuals with and without fovea plana did not differ in any of the characteristics mentioned above apart from posterior vitreous detachment, which was more frequent in those with than without fovea plana (p = 0.038).

Conclusion: The prevalence of fovea plana is higher in patients with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment, which suggests an association between fovea plana and potential vitreoretinal interface changes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
流变性视网膜脱落患者的眼窝普拉纳患病率。
目的:评估流变性视网膜脱离患者的平面眼窝发生率,并比较有平面眼窝和无平面眼窝患者的脱离特征:这项回顾性、横断面、病例对照研究纳入了流变性视网膜脱离患者。我们收集了人口统计学数据、手术眼的数据、球面等值、最佳矫正视力、晶状体状态、黄斑状态、视网膜孔或裂孔的数量,以及是否存在玻璃体内出血、黄斑孔、视网膜外膜、玻璃体后脱离和增殖性玻璃体视网膜病变。此外,还记录了视网膜手术后的手术类型、填塞物和白内障手术。使用 Spectralis HRA-OCT 设备(德国海德堡工程公司)的光谱域光学相干断层扫描黄斑立方体来评估眼窝。图像由两名不同的研究人员进行分级,如有异议,则由第三名研究人员进行分级:我们共纳入了 204 人,其中 35 人(17.2%)有平面眼窝,这一比例明显高于普通人群(p = 0.041)。除玻璃体后脱离外,有平面眼窝和无平面眼窝的患者在上述特征方面没有任何差异,但玻璃体后脱离在有平面眼窝和无平面眼窝的患者中更为常见(p = 0.038):结论:流变性视网膜脱离患者的平面窝发生率较高,这表明平面窝与潜在的玻璃体视网膜界面变化之间存在关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
372
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Ophthalmology was founded in 1991 and is issued in print bi-monthly. It publishes only peer-reviewed original research reporting clinical observations and laboratory investigations with clinical relevance focusing on new diagnostic and surgical techniques, instrument and therapy updates, results of clinical trials and research findings.
期刊最新文献
Acute infectious endophthalmitis after chandelier-assisted scleral buckling surgery. Bagel sign and how to avoid it in DMEK surgery. Changes in choroidal thickness and lamina cribrosa position in subjects with overdipper pattern of arterial pressure. Characteristics of submacular hemorrhage with bacillary layer detachment and intrabacillary hemorrhage. Comparison of 3-month clinical outcomes between two enhanced monofocal intraocular lenses: A single-center prospective study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1