Incidence and predictors of acute coronary syndrome after transcatheter mitral valve repair.

IF 1.8 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-19 DOI:10.1080/14779072.2024.2398443
Mishita Goel, Irfan Shafi, Adel Elmoghrabi, Karthik Ramaseshan, Mohammed M Uddin, Nasser Lakkis, Chadi Alraies
{"title":"Incidence and predictors of acute coronary syndrome after transcatheter mitral valve repair.","authors":"Mishita Goel, Irfan Shafi, Adel Elmoghrabi, Karthik Ramaseshan, Mohammed M Uddin, Nasser Lakkis, Chadi Alraies","doi":"10.1080/14779072.2024.2398443","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) post-transcatheter mitral valve repair (TMVR) carries high mortality. We aim to study the incidence and predictors of ACS in patients who underwent TMVR.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>We queried the U.S. National Readmission Database to identify all cases of TMVR from 2016 to 2019. We further evaluated the incidence of ACS and used multivariable logistic regression to determine independent predictors of ACS in this population.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 3,742 patients who underwent TMVR, 264 (7.05%) developed ACS. Among ACS patients, 204 (77%) had non-ST-segment elevation ACS and 66 (25%) had ST-segment elevation ACS. Independent predictors of ACS were acute limb ischemia, cardiogenic shock, history of coronary artery disease (CAD), smoking, cardiac arrest, respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation, and acute kidney injury. In-hospital mortality among ACS was three times higher in ACS patients than without ACS (16.76% vs. 5.45%, p-value < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ACS is not an uncommon complication after TMVR. The occurrence of ACS after TMVR is associated with high in-hospital mortality, longer length of stay, and higher hospital charges. The strongest predictors of ACS in these patients are the development of acute limb ischemia, cardiogenic shock, and a history of CAD.</p>","PeriodicalId":12098,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"517-522"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14779072.2024.2398443","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) post-transcatheter mitral valve repair (TMVR) carries high mortality. We aim to study the incidence and predictors of ACS in patients who underwent TMVR.

Research design and methods: We queried the U.S. National Readmission Database to identify all cases of TMVR from 2016 to 2019. We further evaluated the incidence of ACS and used multivariable logistic regression to determine independent predictors of ACS in this population.

Results: Among 3,742 patients who underwent TMVR, 264 (7.05%) developed ACS. Among ACS patients, 204 (77%) had non-ST-segment elevation ACS and 66 (25%) had ST-segment elevation ACS. Independent predictors of ACS were acute limb ischemia, cardiogenic shock, history of coronary artery disease (CAD), smoking, cardiac arrest, respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation, and acute kidney injury. In-hospital mortality among ACS was three times higher in ACS patients than without ACS (16.76% vs. 5.45%, p-value < 0.01).

Conclusions: ACS is not an uncommon complication after TMVR. The occurrence of ACS after TMVR is associated with high in-hospital mortality, longer length of stay, and higher hospital charges. The strongest predictors of ACS in these patients are the development of acute limb ischemia, cardiogenic shock, and a history of CAD.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经导管二尖瓣修复术后急性冠状动脉综合征的发病率和预测因素。
背景:经导管二尖瓣修复术(TMVR)后急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)的死亡率很高。我们旨在研究接受经导管二尖瓣置换术(TMVR)患者的急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)发生率和预测因素:我们查询了美国国家再入院数据库,以确定 2016 年至 2019 年的所有 TMVR 病例。我们进一步评估了ACS的发生率,并使用多变量逻辑回归确定了这一人群中ACS的独立预测因素:在3742名接受TMVR的患者中,264人(7.05%)发生了ACS。在 ACS 患者中,204 人(77%)为非 ST 段抬高型 ACS,66 人(25%)为 ST 段抬高型 ACS。急性心肌梗死的独立预测因素包括急性肢体缺血、心源性休克、冠状动脉疾病(CAD)病史、吸烟、心脏骤停、需要机械通气的呼吸衰竭和急性肾损伤。ACS患者的院内死亡率是无ACS患者的三倍(16.76%对5.45%,P值<0.01):结论:ACS并非TMVR术后的罕见并发症。结论:TMVR术后发生ACS并非罕见并发症,它与较高的院内死亡率、较长的住院时间和较高的住院费用相关。这些患者发生 ACS 的最强预测因素是急性肢体缺血、心源性休克和 CAD 病史。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy
Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
82
期刊介绍: Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy (ISSN 1477-9072) provides expert reviews on the clinical applications of new medicines, therapeutic agents and diagnostics in cardiovascular disease. Coverage includes drug therapy, heart disease, vascular disorders, hypertension, cholesterol in cardiovascular disease, heart disease, stroke, heart failure and cardiovascular surgery. The Expert Review format is unique. Each review provides a complete overview of current thinking in a key area of research or clinical practice.
期刊最新文献
Contemporary review of the evolution of various treatment modalities for mitral regurgitation. Risk management of patients with multiple CVDs: what are the best practices? Treatment of hypertension in the elderly: target the lowest well tolerated blood pressure. Short-term and long-term outcomes of cardiac arrhythmias in patients with cardiogenic shock. Nattokinase as an adjuvant therapeutic strategy for non-communicable diseases: a review of fibrinolytic, antithrombotic, anti-inflammatory, and antioxidant effects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1