Ultrasound for the Diagnosis of Giant Cell Arteritis.

IF 1.3 Q4 RHEUMATOLOGY European journal of rheumatology Pub Date : 2024-07-05 DOI:10.5152/eurjrheum.2024.20104
Paula Valentina Estrada Alarcón, Patricia Moya Alvarado, Elena Leonor Sirvent Alierta
{"title":"Ultrasound for the Diagnosis of Giant Cell Arteritis.","authors":"Paula Valentina Estrada Alarcón, Patricia Moya Alvarado, Elena Leonor Sirvent Alierta","doi":"10.5152/eurjrheum.2024.20104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is the most frequent large vessel primary vasculitis in the elderly. Correct diagnosis and fast assessment are necessary to prevent complications as well as unnecessary treatments. Giant cell arteritis can present as classical cranial symptoms or as extracranial disease. Although temporal artery biopsy is still the gold standard, ultrasound (US) is gaining ground on evidence with good diagnostic performance as a first approach to support the clinical criteria. The \"halo\" sign is the most characteristic finding and should be a requisite for reporting an US assessment for GCA with a 43%- 77% sensitivity and 89%-100% specificity, when compared to American College of Rheumatology 1990 criteria. Ultrasound is a cost-effective, noninvasive test that offers bed-side results. The need for an experienced sonographer and consensus on the methodology and interpretation of US is fundamental to reduce operator-dependent errors. The diagnostic US algorithm for GCA depends on the clinical scenarios, and in some cases it may be enough to confirm or discard the GCA diagnosis. We review procedure details for cranial and extracranial arteries and technical requirements.</p>","PeriodicalId":12066,"journal":{"name":"European journal of rheumatology","volume":"11 3","pages":"S283-S289"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11459609/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5152/eurjrheum.2024.20104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is the most frequent large vessel primary vasculitis in the elderly. Correct diagnosis and fast assessment are necessary to prevent complications as well as unnecessary treatments. Giant cell arteritis can present as classical cranial symptoms or as extracranial disease. Although temporal artery biopsy is still the gold standard, ultrasound (US) is gaining ground on evidence with good diagnostic performance as a first approach to support the clinical criteria. The "halo" sign is the most characteristic finding and should be a requisite for reporting an US assessment for GCA with a 43%- 77% sensitivity and 89%-100% specificity, when compared to American College of Rheumatology 1990 criteria. Ultrasound is a cost-effective, noninvasive test that offers bed-side results. The need for an experienced sonographer and consensus on the methodology and interpretation of US is fundamental to reduce operator-dependent errors. The diagnostic US algorithm for GCA depends on the clinical scenarios, and in some cases it may be enough to confirm or discard the GCA diagnosis. We review procedure details for cranial and extracranial arteries and technical requirements.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超声波诊断巨细胞动脉炎。
巨细胞动脉炎(GCA)是老年人最常见的大血管原发性脉管炎。正确诊断和快速评估对于预防并发症和不必要的治疗非常必要。巨细胞动脉炎可表现为典型的颅内症状或颅外疾病。虽然颞动脉活检仍是金标准,但超声(US)作为支持临床标准的首选方法,其良好的诊断性能正逐渐得到证实。光环 "征是最有特征性的发现,应作为报告 US 评估 GCA 的必要条件,与美国风湿病学会 1990 年的标准相比,其敏感性为 43%- 77%,特异性为 89%-100%。超声检查是一种经济有效的无创检查,可在床边提供结果。需要经验丰富的超声波技师,并就超声波检查的方法和解释达成共识,这是减少因操作者而产生的误差的基础。GCA 的 US 诊断算法取决于临床情况,在某些情况下,它可能足以确诊或排除 GCA 诊断。我们回顾了颅内和颅外动脉的手术细节和技术要求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
56
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊最新文献
Bullous Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus and Class V Lupus Nephritis: Rare Concurrence. Comparison and Significance of Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomographic Findings of Large-Vessel Vasculitis Before and After Treatment: Differences Between Takayasu Arteritis and Giant Cell Arteritis. Evaluation of Rheumatologists' Teledermatology Practices and Perspectives. Factors Associated with the Development of Anti-drug Antibodies to TNFi and the Consequences for Axial Spondyloarthritis: A Two-year Follow-up Study. Homeopathy for Rheumatological Diseases: A Systematic Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1