American Radium Society Appropriate Use Criteria for the Workup and Treatment of Local Intraprostatic Recurrence of Prostate Cancer Following Definitive Radiotherapy.

IF 8.3 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY European urology oncology Pub Date : 2024-09-21 DOI:10.1016/j.euo.2024.09.005
Luca F Valle, Tommy Jiang, Ashton Rosenbloom, Nicholas G Zaorsky, Clara Hwang, Abhishek Solanki, Daniel Dickstein, Timur Mitin, Thomas Schroeder, Louis Potters, Shane Lloyd, Tim Showalter, Hilary P Bagshaw, R Jeffrey Karnes, Karen E Hoffman, Paul L Nguyen, Amar U Kishan
{"title":"American Radium Society Appropriate Use Criteria for the Workup and Treatment of Local Intraprostatic Recurrence of Prostate Cancer Following Definitive Radiotherapy.","authors":"Luca F Valle, Tommy Jiang, Ashton Rosenbloom, Nicholas G Zaorsky, Clara Hwang, Abhishek Solanki, Daniel Dickstein, Timur Mitin, Thomas Schroeder, Louis Potters, Shane Lloyd, Tim Showalter, Hilary P Bagshaw, R Jeffrey Karnes, Karen E Hoffman, Paul L Nguyen, Amar U Kishan","doi":"10.1016/j.euo.2024.09.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Local intraprostatic radiorecurrence of prostate cancer (IPR-PC) can be associated with an aggressive natural history and impact long-term disease-specific survival. While appropriate local salvage intervention can be curative, best practices for workup and local salvage of intraprostatic recurrence are poorly defined. The American Radium Society (ARS) Genitourinary Appropriate Use Criteria Committee sought to develop evidence-based recommendations to address this gap.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed and Embase were searched to retrieve a comprehensive set of relevant peer-reviewed articles on four topics relevant to the workup and treatment of IPR-PC. The literature was evaluated and summarized by three investigators, and clinical variants were created for each of the four topics. The ARS Genitourinary AUC multidisciplinary expert panel voted on the most appropriate procedures for each variant, and a modified Delphi approach was used to summarize recommendations.</p><p><strong>Key findings and limitations: </strong>The panel concluded that radiographic staging via prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA PET) and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging should be performed to exclude patients with metastatic disease and identify the local extent of radiorecurrence. Biopsy is required before local salvage to avoid excessive toxicity in patients whose radiographic recurrence represents a treatment effect. Consideration of local salvage is preferred in lieu of noncurative hormonal manipulation alone, although shared decision-making is critical. Salvage reirradiation approaches are recommended to limit toxicity. Hormonal therapy may be beneficial for radiosensitization when radiotherapeutic salvage is pursued, but only of short duration, and classic androgen deprivation therapies are preferred over novel hormonal agents. Focal salvage should be pursued when confidence in focal recurrence can be confirmed via multiple radiographic and tissue sampling modalities, although the toxicity associated with whole-gland salvage appears to be very tolerable. Several radiotherapeutic salvage regimens exist, most of which can be carried out in six or fewer fractions. The data informing this guideline are limited to individuals initially treated with conventionally fractionated external beam radiotherapy and with workup for recurrence before the PSMA PET era.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and clinical implications: </strong>This consensus guideline provides evidence-based guidance on the appropriate procedures for workup and treatment of IPR-PC. Prospective evidence to enrich these guidelines is eagerly anticipated.</p><p><strong>Patient summary: </strong>We summarize evidence for the best workup and treatment for patients with local recurrence of prostate cancer after radiotherapy. A panel of experts evaluated previous studies and voted on the procedures that should be performed and those that should be avoided. This guideline is a useful tool for helping doctors to discuss the best treatment options that maximize the chance of cure while minimizing side effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":12256,"journal":{"name":"European urology oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European urology oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2024.09.005","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objective: Local intraprostatic radiorecurrence of prostate cancer (IPR-PC) can be associated with an aggressive natural history and impact long-term disease-specific survival. While appropriate local salvage intervention can be curative, best practices for workup and local salvage of intraprostatic recurrence are poorly defined. The American Radium Society (ARS) Genitourinary Appropriate Use Criteria Committee sought to develop evidence-based recommendations to address this gap.

Methods: PubMed and Embase were searched to retrieve a comprehensive set of relevant peer-reviewed articles on four topics relevant to the workup and treatment of IPR-PC. The literature was evaluated and summarized by three investigators, and clinical variants were created for each of the four topics. The ARS Genitourinary AUC multidisciplinary expert panel voted on the most appropriate procedures for each variant, and a modified Delphi approach was used to summarize recommendations.

Key findings and limitations: The panel concluded that radiographic staging via prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA PET) and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging should be performed to exclude patients with metastatic disease and identify the local extent of radiorecurrence. Biopsy is required before local salvage to avoid excessive toxicity in patients whose radiographic recurrence represents a treatment effect. Consideration of local salvage is preferred in lieu of noncurative hormonal manipulation alone, although shared decision-making is critical. Salvage reirradiation approaches are recommended to limit toxicity. Hormonal therapy may be beneficial for radiosensitization when radiotherapeutic salvage is pursued, but only of short duration, and classic androgen deprivation therapies are preferred over novel hormonal agents. Focal salvage should be pursued when confidence in focal recurrence can be confirmed via multiple radiographic and tissue sampling modalities, although the toxicity associated with whole-gland salvage appears to be very tolerable. Several radiotherapeutic salvage regimens exist, most of which can be carried out in six or fewer fractions. The data informing this guideline are limited to individuals initially treated with conventionally fractionated external beam radiotherapy and with workup for recurrence before the PSMA PET era.

Conclusions and clinical implications: This consensus guideline provides evidence-based guidance on the appropriate procedures for workup and treatment of IPR-PC. Prospective evidence to enrich these guidelines is eagerly anticipated.

Patient summary: We summarize evidence for the best workup and treatment for patients with local recurrence of prostate cancer after radiotherapy. A panel of experts evaluated previous studies and voted on the procedures that should be performed and those that should be avoided. This guideline is a useful tool for helping doctors to discuss the best treatment options that maximize the chance of cure while minimizing side effects.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国镭学会《明确放疗后前列腺癌局部前列腺内复发的检查和治疗适当使用标准》。
背景和目的:前列腺癌的局部前列腺内放射复发(IPR-PC)可能与侵袭性自然病史有关,并影响长期疾病特异性生存。虽然适当的局部抢救干预可起到治愈作用,但前列腺内复发的检查和局部抢救的最佳实践还不十分明确。美国镭学会(ARS)泌尿生殖系统适当使用标准委员会试图制定以证据为基础的建议来填补这一空白:方法:对 PubMed 和 Embase 进行了检索,以获取与 IPR-PC 检查和治疗相关的四个主题的一整套相关同行评审文章。三位研究人员对文献进行了评估和总结,并为四个主题分别创建了临床变体。ARS泌尿生殖系统AUC多学科专家小组就每种变异的最合适程序进行了投票,并采用改良的德尔菲法对建议进行了总结:专家组认为,应通过前列腺特异性膜抗原正电子发射断层扫描(PSMA PET)和多参数磁共振成像进行放射学分期,以排除转移性疾病患者并确定局部放射复发范围。局部抢救前必须进行活检,以避免放射复发代表治疗效果的患者出现过度毒性。尽管共同决策至关重要,但考虑局部救治以取代单纯的非治愈性激素治疗是首选方案。建议采用挽救性再照射方法来限制毒性。在进行放射治疗挽救时,激素治疗可能有利于放射增敏,但持续时间较短,传统的雄激素剥夺疗法优于新型激素药物。通过多种放射影像学和组织取样方式确认病灶复发后,应采取病灶挽救治疗,尽管全腺挽救治疗的相关毒性似乎非常容易耐受。目前已有几种放射治疗挽救方案,其中大多数可以在六次或更少的分次内完成。本指南所参考的数据仅限于最初接受传统分次体外放射治疗的患者,以及在 PSMA PET 时代到来之前接受复发检查的患者:本共识指南为 IPR-PC 的适当检查和治疗程序提供了循证指导。患者摘要:我们总结了放疗后前列腺癌局部复发患者最佳检查和治疗的证据。一个专家小组对以往的研究进行了评估,并投票决定了应该进行的手术和应该避免的手术。本指南是帮助医生讨论最佳治疗方案的有用工具,可最大限度地提高治愈几率,同时将副作用降至最低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.50
自引率
2.40%
发文量
128
审稿时长
20 days
期刊介绍: Journal Name: European Urology Oncology Affiliation: Official Journal of the European Association of Urology Focus: First official publication of the EAU fully devoted to the study of genitourinary malignancies Aims to deliver high-quality research Content: Includes original articles, opinion piece editorials, and invited reviews Covers clinical, basic, and translational research Publication Frequency: Six times a year in electronic format
期刊最新文献
Anatomic Factors Associated with Complications After Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Repeat Prostate Cancer Screening using Blood-based Risk Prediction or Prostate-specific Antigen in the Era of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-guided Biopsies : A Secondary Analysis of the STHLM3-MRI Randomized Clinical Trial. A Systematic Review of the Diagnostic Accuracy of Deep Learning Models for the Automatic Detection, Localization, and Characterization of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer on Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Colibactin Exerts Androgen-dependent and -independent Effects on Prostate Cancer. Combined Fixed-duration Systemic Treatment and Metastasis-directed Radiotherapy for Oligometastatic Hormone-sensitive Prostate Cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1