Evaluating the Impact of a Shared Decision-making Intervention for Patients with Renal Cell Carcinoma: The SDM-RCC Study Protocol.

IF 8.3 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY European urology oncology Pub Date : 2024-09-19 DOI:10.1016/j.euo.2024.09.003
Cato C Bresser, Mirjam M Garvelink, Birgitta M M van den Berg, Franklin C K Dolk, Paul B van der Nat, Harm H E van Melick
{"title":"Evaluating the Impact of a Shared Decision-making Intervention for Patients with Renal Cell Carcinoma: The SDM-RCC Study Protocol.","authors":"Cato C Bresser, Mirjam M Garvelink, Birgitta M M van den Berg, Franklin C K Dolk, Paul B van der Nat, Harm H E van Melick","doi":"10.1016/j.euo.2024.09.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of the SDM-RCC study is to evaluate the impact of a comprehensive shared decision-making (SDM) intervention for patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) on the decision-making process and outcomes. The intervention includes online patient decision aids (PtDAs) and training of health care professionals (HCPs) in the use of PtDAs and SDM. The study is a multicenter, prospective pretest-posttest cohort in six Dutch hospitals, focusing on patients with localized or metastatic RCC. The primary outcome is the observed quality of the decision-making process, measured using OPTION-5 scores. Secondary outcomes include perceived quality of the decision-making process, decision quality, and implementation of the intervention (user statistics and interviews). Quantitative analysis will be performed on questionnaire data, while qualitative analysis will be performed on interviews using coding based on established frameworks. The study results could improve understanding of the decision-making process for RCC patients from patient, HCP, and observer perspectives. The SDM tool implemented is expected to support the decision-making process. PATIENT SUMMARY: We are conducting a trial on the effects of a tool to support shared decision-making by patients with kidney cancer who are facing treatment decisions. This paper outlines the protocol that will be used for the trial.</p>","PeriodicalId":12256,"journal":{"name":"European urology oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European urology oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2024.09.003","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of the SDM-RCC study is to evaluate the impact of a comprehensive shared decision-making (SDM) intervention for patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) on the decision-making process and outcomes. The intervention includes online patient decision aids (PtDAs) and training of health care professionals (HCPs) in the use of PtDAs and SDM. The study is a multicenter, prospective pretest-posttest cohort in six Dutch hospitals, focusing on patients with localized or metastatic RCC. The primary outcome is the observed quality of the decision-making process, measured using OPTION-5 scores. Secondary outcomes include perceived quality of the decision-making process, decision quality, and implementation of the intervention (user statistics and interviews). Quantitative analysis will be performed on questionnaire data, while qualitative analysis will be performed on interviews using coding based on established frameworks. The study results could improve understanding of the decision-making process for RCC patients from patient, HCP, and observer perspectives. The SDM tool implemented is expected to support the decision-making process. PATIENT SUMMARY: We are conducting a trial on the effects of a tool to support shared decision-making by patients with kidney cancer who are facing treatment decisions. This paper outlines the protocol that will be used for the trial.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估共同决策干预对肾细胞癌患者的影响:SDM-RCC 研究方案。
SDM-RCC 研究旨在评估针对肾细胞癌(RCC)患者的全面共同决策(SDM)干预对决策过程和结果的影响。干预措施包括在线患者决策辅助工具(PtDAs)以及对医护专业人员(HCPs)进行使用 PtDAs 和 SDM 的培训。该研究是一项多中心、前瞻性的前测-后测队列研究,在荷兰六家医院进行,主要针对局部或转移性 RCC 患者。主要结果是观察到的决策过程质量,采用 OPTION-5 评分进行衡量。次要结果包括决策过程的感知质量、决策质量和干预措施的实施(用户统计和访谈)。将对问卷数据进行定量分析,而对访谈进行定性分析时,将根据既定框架进行编码。研究结果可从患者、HCP 和观察者的角度加深对 RCC 患者决策过程的理解。所采用的 SDM 工具有望为决策过程提供支持。患者摘要:我们正在进行一项试验,研究一种支持面临治疗决策的肾癌患者共同决策的工具的效果。本文概述了试验将采用的方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.50
自引率
2.40%
发文量
128
审稿时长
20 days
期刊介绍: Journal Name: European Urology Oncology Affiliation: Official Journal of the European Association of Urology Focus: First official publication of the EAU fully devoted to the study of genitourinary malignancies Aims to deliver high-quality research Content: Includes original articles, opinion piece editorials, and invited reviews Covers clinical, basic, and translational research Publication Frequency: Six times a year in electronic format
期刊最新文献
Anatomic Factors Associated with Complications After Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Repeat Prostate Cancer Screening using Blood-based Risk Prediction or Prostate-specific Antigen in the Era of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-guided Biopsies : A Secondary Analysis of the STHLM3-MRI Randomized Clinical Trial. A Systematic Review of the Diagnostic Accuracy of Deep Learning Models for the Automatic Detection, Localization, and Characterization of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer on Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Colibactin Exerts Androgen-dependent and -independent Effects on Prostate Cancer. Combined Fixed-duration Systemic Treatment and Metastasis-directed Radiotherapy for Oligometastatic Hormone-sensitive Prostate Cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1