Aligning extracurricular school activities with physical literacy: pilot evaluation through self-study of practice.

IF 2.3 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES Frontiers in Sports and Active Living Pub Date : 2024-08-26 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fspor.2024.1415689
Louisa Schmittwilken, Jodi Harding-Kuriger, Johannes Carl
{"title":"Aligning extracurricular school activities with physical literacy: pilot evaluation through self-study of practice.","authors":"Louisa Schmittwilken, Jodi Harding-Kuriger, Johannes Carl","doi":"10.3389/fspor.2024.1415689","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Although several important documents of education and health promotion on the international level favor practices geared toward physical literacy (PL), not all countries have yet gained experience with this holistic concept. Therefore, numerous stakeholders and practitioners who intend to align their interventional activities with PL will soon face the situation that there are no recommendations for their specific culture and language for how to design such programs. Given that such recommendations are also lacking for Germany, the goal of the present study within the uncontrolled pilot cycles of the PLACE study was (a) to describe the process of a female pedagogue (27 years old, previously unexperienced with PL) initially familiarizing herself with the PL concept and its implementation opportunities for the school setting, and (b) to retrace the process of developing and refining a PL-driven intervention for extracurricular physical education (60-90 min) of children in grades three and four at primary schools in Bremen.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adopting a self-study design, this endeavor emphasized continuous reflexivity involving: (a) session protocols; (b) biweekly discussions with another coach; (c) weekly discussions between scientists and stakeholders of youth development (\"multi-perspective panel\"); (d) weekly observations and impressions during field work; and (e) summative group interviews with children (<i>n</i> = 17, age range: 8-9 years, 17.6% boys). Written documents underwent qualitative content analysis with inductively generated categories.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Despite explicit links between the theoretical PL domains and the intervention content, the character of how PL informed the intervention level was dominated by the stance and atmosphere implemented by the deliverer (e.g., participatory attitude, open mindset). Accordingly, the team revised the intervention primarily on the levels of organization (temporal schedule and sequences), instruction, and materials. After initial stages of didactically \"surviving\" within classes, the deliverer could increasingly integrate tasks of cognitive engagement and provide choice for students enabling individual autonomy for nurturing a person-centered approach.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This study encourages teachers and stakeholders of physical education to seek exchange with scholars or other practitioners while simultaneously demonstrating patience in comprehensively internalizing PL and efficiently translating the concept into routines in line with individual's quality standards.</p>","PeriodicalId":12716,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Sports and Active Living","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11381300/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Sports and Active Living","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2024.1415689","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Although several important documents of education and health promotion on the international level favor practices geared toward physical literacy (PL), not all countries have yet gained experience with this holistic concept. Therefore, numerous stakeholders and practitioners who intend to align their interventional activities with PL will soon face the situation that there are no recommendations for their specific culture and language for how to design such programs. Given that such recommendations are also lacking for Germany, the goal of the present study within the uncontrolled pilot cycles of the PLACE study was (a) to describe the process of a female pedagogue (27 years old, previously unexperienced with PL) initially familiarizing herself with the PL concept and its implementation opportunities for the school setting, and (b) to retrace the process of developing and refining a PL-driven intervention for extracurricular physical education (60-90 min) of children in grades three and four at primary schools in Bremen.

Methods: Adopting a self-study design, this endeavor emphasized continuous reflexivity involving: (a) session protocols; (b) biweekly discussions with another coach; (c) weekly discussions between scientists and stakeholders of youth development ("multi-perspective panel"); (d) weekly observations and impressions during field work; and (e) summative group interviews with children (n = 17, age range: 8-9 years, 17.6% boys). Written documents underwent qualitative content analysis with inductively generated categories.

Results: Despite explicit links between the theoretical PL domains and the intervention content, the character of how PL informed the intervention level was dominated by the stance and atmosphere implemented by the deliverer (e.g., participatory attitude, open mindset). Accordingly, the team revised the intervention primarily on the levels of organization (temporal schedule and sequences), instruction, and materials. After initial stages of didactically "surviving" within classes, the deliverer could increasingly integrate tasks of cognitive engagement and provide choice for students enabling individual autonomy for nurturing a person-centered approach.

Discussion: This study encourages teachers and stakeholders of physical education to seek exchange with scholars or other practitioners while simultaneously demonstrating patience in comprehensively internalizing PL and efficiently translating the concept into routines in line with individual's quality standards.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
将学校课外活动与体育素养结合起来:通过实践自学进行试点评估。
导言:尽管国际上一些重要的教育和健康促进文件都支持以体育素养(PL)为导向的做法,但并非所有国家都已在这一整体概念方面积累了经验。因此,许多利益相关者和从业人员如果打算将其干预活动与 "体育素养 "结合起来,很快就会面临这样一种情况,即没有针对其特定文化和语言的建议来指导如何设计此类计划。鉴于德国也缺乏此类建议,本研究在 PLACE 研究的非控制试点周期内的目标是:(a) 描述一名女教师(27 岁,以前没有 PL 经验)初步熟悉 PL 概念及其在学校环境中的实施机会的过程;(b) 回溯不莱梅小学三、四年级儿童课外体育教育(60-90 分钟)中以 PL 为导向的干预措施的开发和完善过程:采用自我研究设计,强调持续的反思性,包括:(a) 课程协议;(b) 每两周与另一名教练的讨论;(c) 科学家与青少年发展利益相关者之间的每周讨论("多视角小组");(d) 实地工作中的每周观察和印象;(e) 与儿童(n = 17,年龄范围:8-9 岁,17.6% 为男孩)的总结性小组访谈。通过归纳分类对书面文件进行了定性内容分析:尽管可持续发展理论领域与干预内容之间有明确的联系,但可持续发展对干预水平的影响主要取决于实施者的立场和氛围(如参与态度、开放心态)。因此,小组主要从组织(时间安排和顺序)、教学和材料三个层面对干预措施进行了修订。经过最初在课堂上 "苟延残喘 "的说教阶段后,传递者可以越来越多地整合认知参与任务,并为学生提供选择,使他们能够实现个人自主,培养以人为本的方法:本研究鼓励体育教师和相关人员寻求与学者或其他实践者的交流,同时耐心地全面内化 PL 概念,并有效地将其转化为符合个人质量标准的常规。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
7.40%
发文量
459
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Inter-individual differences in muscle damage following a single bout of high-intense whole-body electromyostimulation. Habitual water intake impacted the body composition of young male athletes in free-living conditions: a cross-sectional study. The relationship between maximal lactate accumulation rate and sprint performance parameters in male competitive swimmers. Coach perspectives on coach-athlete relationships and characteristics of Generation Z academy level rugby union players from South Africa. Digital fist bumps: searching for datafication and digitalisation in everyday CrossFit coaching practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1