Correspondence between the Simple Physical Activity Questionnaire (SIMPAQ) and accelerometer-based physical activity in inpatients treated for major depressive disorders in comparison to non-depressed controls.

IF 2.3 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES Frontiers in Sports and Active Living Pub Date : 2024-09-06 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fspor.2024.1447821
René Schilling, Robyn Cody, Jan-Niklas Kreppke, Oliver Faude, Johannes Beck, Serge Brand, Lars Donath, Martin Hatzinger, Christian Imboden, Undine Lang, Sarah Mans, Thorsten Mikoteit, Anja Oswald, Nina Schweinfurth-Keck, Markus Gerber
{"title":"Correspondence between the Simple Physical Activity Questionnaire (SIMPAQ) and accelerometer-based physical activity in inpatients treated for major depressive disorders in comparison to non-depressed controls.","authors":"René Schilling, Robyn Cody, Jan-Niklas Kreppke, Oliver Faude, Johannes Beck, Serge Brand, Lars Donath, Martin Hatzinger, Christian Imboden, Undine Lang, Sarah Mans, Thorsten Mikoteit, Anja Oswald, Nina Schweinfurth-Keck, Markus Gerber","doi":"10.3389/fspor.2024.1447821","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Major depressive disorders (MDD) are a leading health concern worldwide. While first line medication treatments may fall short of desired therapeutic outcomes, physical activity (PA) interventions appear to be a promising and cost-effective add-on to improve symptoms of depression. This study aimed to address challenges in the assessment of PA in inpatients treated for MDD by examining the correspondence of self-reported and accelerometer-based PA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In 178 inpatients treated for MDD (mean age: <i>M</i> = 41.11 years, SD = 12.84; 45.5% female) and 97 non-depressed controls (mean age: <i>M</i> = 35.24 years, SD = 13.40; 36.1% female), we assessed self-reported PA via the Simple Physical Activity Questionnaire (SIMPAQ) for one week, followed by a week where PA was monitored using an accelerometer device (Actigraph wGT3x-BT). Additionally, we examined correlations between PA levels assessed with the SIMPAQ and exercise determinants in both groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Descriptively, inpatients treated for MDD showed lower levels of light PA on accelerometer-based measures, whereas they self-reported increased levels of certain types of PA on the SIMPAQ. More importantly, there was only a small degree of correspondence between self-reported and actigraphy-based PA levels in both in patients (<i>r</i> = 0.15, <i>p</i> < 0.05) and controls (<i>r</i> = 0.03, ns). Only few significant correlations were found for self-reported PA (SIMPAQ subscores) and perceived fitness, whereas self-reported PA and estimated VO<sub>2</sub>max were unrelated. Furthermore, only weak (and mostly statistically non-significant) correlations were found between exercise determinants and SIMPAQ-based exercise behavior in both populations.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Our findings emphasize the intricate challenges in the assessment of PA, not only in inpatients treated for MDD, but also in non-depressed controls. Our findings also underline the necessity for a diversified data assessment. Further efforts are needed to refine and improve PA questionnaires for a more accurate data assessment in psychiatric patients and healthy controls.</p>","PeriodicalId":12716,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Sports and Active Living","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11412836/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Sports and Active Living","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2024.1447821","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Major depressive disorders (MDD) are a leading health concern worldwide. While first line medication treatments may fall short of desired therapeutic outcomes, physical activity (PA) interventions appear to be a promising and cost-effective add-on to improve symptoms of depression. This study aimed to address challenges in the assessment of PA in inpatients treated for MDD by examining the correspondence of self-reported and accelerometer-based PA.

Methods: In 178 inpatients treated for MDD (mean age: M = 41.11 years, SD = 12.84; 45.5% female) and 97 non-depressed controls (mean age: M = 35.24 years, SD = 13.40; 36.1% female), we assessed self-reported PA via the Simple Physical Activity Questionnaire (SIMPAQ) for one week, followed by a week where PA was monitored using an accelerometer device (Actigraph wGT3x-BT). Additionally, we examined correlations between PA levels assessed with the SIMPAQ and exercise determinants in both groups.

Results: Descriptively, inpatients treated for MDD showed lower levels of light PA on accelerometer-based measures, whereas they self-reported increased levels of certain types of PA on the SIMPAQ. More importantly, there was only a small degree of correspondence between self-reported and actigraphy-based PA levels in both in patients (r = 0.15, p < 0.05) and controls (r = 0.03, ns). Only few significant correlations were found for self-reported PA (SIMPAQ subscores) and perceived fitness, whereas self-reported PA and estimated VO2max were unrelated. Furthermore, only weak (and mostly statistically non-significant) correlations were found between exercise determinants and SIMPAQ-based exercise behavior in both populations.

Discussion: Our findings emphasize the intricate challenges in the assessment of PA, not only in inpatients treated for MDD, but also in non-depressed controls. Our findings also underline the necessity for a diversified data assessment. Further efforts are needed to refine and improve PA questionnaires for a more accurate data assessment in psychiatric patients and healthy controls.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
与非抑郁症对照组相比,接受重度抑郁症治疗的住院病人的简单体力活动问卷(SIMPAQ)与加速度计测量的体力活动之间的对应关系。
简介重度抑郁症(MDD)是全球关注的主要健康问题。虽然一线药物治疗可能达不到预期的治疗效果,但体力活动(PA)干预似乎是一种很有前景且具有成本效益的改善抑郁症状的附加疗法。本研究旨在通过研究自我报告的体力活动量与加速度计测量的体力活动量之间的对应关系,解决在对接受 MDD 治疗的住院患者进行体力活动量评估时遇到的难题:在 178 名接受 MDD 治疗的住院患者(平均年龄:M = 41.11 岁,SD = 12.84;45.5% 为女性)和 97 名非抑郁症对照组患者(平均年龄:M = 35.24 岁,SD = 13.40;36.1% 为女性)中,我们通过简单身体活动问卷 (SIMPAQ) 对自我报告的 PA 进行了为期一周的评估,随后又使用加速度计设备(Actigraph wGT3x-BT)对 PA 进行了为期一周的监测。此外,我们还研究了两组患者使用 SIMPAQ 评估的 PA 水平与运动决定因素之间的相关性:从描述性角度来看,接受 MDD 治疗的住院患者在加速计测量中显示出较低的轻度 PA 水平,而他们在 SIMPAQ 中自我报告的某些类型 PA 水平却有所提高。更重要的是,在这两种患者中,自我报告的活动量水平与基于加速度计的活动量水平之间只有很小程度的对应关系(r = 0.15,p r = 0.03,ns)。自我报告的活动量(SIMPAQ 子评分)与感知体能之间仅存在极少量的明显相关性,而自我报告的活动量与估计的最大氧饱和度之间则不存在相关性。此外,在这两个人群中,运动决定因素与基于 SIMPAQ 的运动行为之间只存在微弱的相关性(在统计上大多不显著):讨论:我们的研究结果表明,不仅在接受 MDD 治疗的住院病人中,而且在非抑郁症对照组中,对 PA 的评估都面临着错综复杂的挑战。我们的研究结果还强调了多元化数据评估的必要性。为了对精神病患者和健康对照组进行更准确的数据评估,还需要进一步努力完善和改进 PA 问卷。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
7.40%
发文量
459
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Inter-individual differences in muscle damage following a single bout of high-intense whole-body electromyostimulation. Habitual water intake impacted the body composition of young male athletes in free-living conditions: a cross-sectional study. The relationship between maximal lactate accumulation rate and sprint performance parameters in male competitive swimmers. Coach perspectives on coach-athlete relationships and characteristics of Generation Z academy level rugby union players from South Africa. Digital fist bumps: searching for datafication and digitalisation in everyday CrossFit coaching practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1