The effect of a 5-week therapeutic massage on erector spinae and upper trapezius muscle stiffness as determined by shear-wave elastography: a randomized controlled trial.

IF 2.6 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES Frontiers in Sports and Active Living Pub Date : 2024-08-26 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fspor.2024.1428301
Amadej Jelen, Erina Javornik, Sara Gloria Meh, Žiga Kozinc
{"title":"The effect of a 5-week therapeutic massage on erector spinae and upper trapezius muscle stiffness as determined by shear-wave elastography: a randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Amadej Jelen, Erina Javornik, Sara Gloria Meh, Žiga Kozinc","doi":"10.3389/fspor.2024.1428301","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Massage is an effective treatment for reducing pain, swelling, stiffness, and improving muscle mobility. Although self-reported benefits on muscle stiffness and pain are well-known, studies measuring muscle stiffness objectively are scarce.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A randomized controlled trial involving 30 recreationally active young women (22.3 ± 0.4 years) was conducted. The participants were randomly assigned to either the control group or the intervention group which received a series of five 30-min whole back therapeutic massage sessions over 5 weeks. Shear wave elastography was used to assess muscle stiffness (erector spinae (ESp) and upper trapezius (UT) muscles) before and after the intervention and at 3-week follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For ESp, there was no statistically significant time × group interaction (<i>F</i> = 2.908; <i>p</i> = 0.063). However, there was a statistically significant and large time × group interaction for UT (<i>F</i> = 13.533; <i>p</i> = 0.006; <i>η</i> <sup>2</sup> = 0.19). <i>Post-hoc</i> testing for time indicated that the shear modulus in the intervention group was reduced at follow-up (<i>p</i> = 0.005; <i>d</i> = 1.02), while the difference between baseline and post-intervention measurements were not statistically significant (<i>p</i> = 0.053; <i>d</i> = 0.75).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In conclusion, massage significantly reduced proximal UT stiffness both 3 days and 3 weeks after the intervention. However, it had no significant effect on the distal part of UT or the ESp muscle.</p>","PeriodicalId":12716,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Sports and Active Living","volume":"6 ","pages":"1428301"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11381258/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Sports and Active Living","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2024.1428301","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Massage is an effective treatment for reducing pain, swelling, stiffness, and improving muscle mobility. Although self-reported benefits on muscle stiffness and pain are well-known, studies measuring muscle stiffness objectively are scarce.

Methods: A randomized controlled trial involving 30 recreationally active young women (22.3 ± 0.4 years) was conducted. The participants were randomly assigned to either the control group or the intervention group which received a series of five 30-min whole back therapeutic massage sessions over 5 weeks. Shear wave elastography was used to assess muscle stiffness (erector spinae (ESp) and upper trapezius (UT) muscles) before and after the intervention and at 3-week follow-up.

Results: For ESp, there was no statistically significant time × group interaction (F = 2.908; p = 0.063). However, there was a statistically significant and large time × group interaction for UT (F = 13.533; p = 0.006; η 2 = 0.19). Post-hoc testing for time indicated that the shear modulus in the intervention group was reduced at follow-up (p = 0.005; d = 1.02), while the difference between baseline and post-intervention measurements were not statistically significant (p = 0.053; d = 0.75).

Conclusion: In conclusion, massage significantly reduced proximal UT stiffness both 3 days and 3 weeks after the intervention. However, it had no significant effect on the distal part of UT or the ESp muscle.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为期 5 周的治疗性按摩对通过剪切波弹性成像测定的竖脊肌和斜方肌上端的肌肉僵硬度的影响:随机对照试验。
介绍:按摩是减轻疼痛、肿胀、僵硬和改善肌肉活动度的有效治疗方法。虽然自我报告对肌肉僵硬和疼痛的益处众所周知,但客观测量肌肉僵硬程度的研究却很少:方法:我们进行了一项随机对照试验,参与者包括 30 名从事娱乐活动的年轻女性(22.3 ± 0.4 岁)。参与者被随机分配到对照组或干预组,干预组在 5 周内接受 5 次 30 分钟的全背部治疗性按摩。采用剪切波弹性成像技术评估干预前后和三周随访时的肌肉僵硬度(竖脊肌(ESP)和斜方肌上部(UT)):就 ESp 而言,时间与组别的交互作用在统计学上并不显著(F = 2.908;P = 0.063)。然而,在UT方面,时间与组别的交互作用在统计学上具有显著性,且交互作用较大(F = 13.533; p = 0.006; η 2 = 0.19)。时间的事后检验表明,干预组的剪切模量在随访时有所降低(p = 0.005;d = 1.02),而基线和干预后测量值之间的差异无统计学意义(p = 0.053;d = 0.75):总之,在干预 3 天和 3 周后,按摩都能明显减轻UT近端僵硬。结论:无论在干预后 3 天还是 3 周,按摩都能明显减轻UT 近端僵硬,但对UT 远端或 ESp 肌肉没有明显影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
7.40%
发文量
459
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Comparison of post-activation performance enhancement in the lower limbs of short sprinters based on two velocity loss thresholds. Effects of personalized time-trial goal setting on swimming performance and psychological profiles in competitive swimmers. In-game monitoring of adolescent handball players: a preliminary examination of associations between external load parameters and objective and subjective fatigue markers. Associations between perceived physical literacy and physical fitness tests among the adult population. Effects of different support surfaces on postural stability and sensorimotor cortex activation among individuals with chronic ankle instability.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1