Ethical, legal, and social issues related to genetics and genomics in cancer: A scoping review and narrative synthesis

IF 6.6 1区 医学 Q1 GENETICS & HEREDITY Genetics in Medicine Pub Date : 2024-09-13 DOI:10.1016/j.gim.2024.101270
Amelia K. Smit , Akira Gokoolparsadh , Rebekah McWhirter , Lyndsay Newett , Vivienne Milch , Azure Hermes , Aideen McInerney-Leo , Ainsley J. Newson
{"title":"Ethical, legal, and social issues related to genetics and genomics in cancer: A scoping review and narrative synthesis","authors":"Amelia K. Smit ,&nbsp;Akira Gokoolparsadh ,&nbsp;Rebekah McWhirter ,&nbsp;Lyndsay Newett ,&nbsp;Vivienne Milch ,&nbsp;Azure Hermes ,&nbsp;Aideen McInerney-Leo ,&nbsp;Ainsley J. Newson","doi":"10.1016/j.gim.2024.101270","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Genomics is increasingly being incorporated into models of care for cancer. Understanding the ethical, legal, and social issues (ELSI) in this domain is important for successful and equitable implementation. We aimed to identify ELSI scholarship specific to cancer control and genomics. To do this, we undertook a scoping literature review and narrative synthesis, identifying 46 articles that met inclusion criteria. Eighteen ELSI themes were developed, including (1) equity of access, which included structural barriers to testing and research, access to preventive and follow-up care, and engagement with health systems; (2) family considerations, such as an ethical obligation to disseminate relevant genomic information to at-risk family members; (3) legal considerations, including privacy and confidentiality, genetic discrimination, and the prospective duty to reclassify variants; and (4) optimizing consent processes in clinical care and research. Gaps in the literature were identified with respect to equity for people living in rural or remote areas, and how to provide ethical care within culturally, linguistically, and ethnically diverse communities, including First Nations peoples. Our findings suggest a need for a multidisciplinary approach to examining ELSI in cancer genomics beyond initial test indication and within the broader context of the mainstreaming of genomics in health care.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12717,"journal":{"name":"Genetics in Medicine","volume":"26 12","pages":"Article 101270"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genetics in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1098360024002041","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Genomics is increasingly being incorporated into models of care for cancer. Understanding the ethical, legal, and social issues (ELSI) in this domain is important for successful and equitable implementation. We aimed to identify ELSI scholarship specific to cancer control and genomics. To do this, we undertook a scoping literature review and narrative synthesis, identifying 46 articles that met inclusion criteria. Eighteen ELSI themes were developed, including (1) equity of access, which included structural barriers to testing and research, access to preventive and follow-up care, and engagement with health systems; (2) family considerations, such as an ethical obligation to disseminate relevant genomic information to at-risk family members; (3) legal considerations, including privacy and confidentiality, genetic discrimination, and the prospective duty to reclassify variants; and (4) optimizing consent processes in clinical care and research. Gaps in the literature were identified with respect to equity for people living in rural or remote areas, and how to provide ethical care within culturally, linguistically, and ethnically diverse communities, including First Nations peoples. Our findings suggest a need for a multidisciplinary approach to examining ELSI in cancer genomics beyond initial test indication and within the broader context of the mainstreaming of genomics in health care.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
与癌症遗传学和基因组学有关的伦理、法律和社会问题:范围综述和叙述性综述。
基因组学正越来越多地被纳入癌症治疗模式。了解这一领域的伦理、法律和社会影响(ELSI)对于成功和公平地实施非常重要。我们的目标是确定专门针对癌症控制和基因组学的 ELSI 奖学金。为此,我们进行了范围界定文献综述和叙述性综述,确定了 46 篇符合纳入标准的文章。我们制定了 18 个 ELSI 主题,包括:(i) 公平获取,其中包括检测和研究的结构性障碍、预防和后续护理的获取以及与卫生系统的接触;(ii) 家庭因素,如向高风险家庭成员传播相关基因组信息的道德义务;(iii) 法律因素,包括隐私和保密、基因歧视以及重新分类变异的预期责任;以及 (iv) 优化临床护理和研究中的同意程序。在农村或偏远地区居民的公平性方面,以及如何在文化、语言和种族多样化的社区(包括原住民)中提供符合伦理的护理方面,我们发现了文献中的空白。我们的研究结果表明,有必要采用多学科方法来研究癌症基因组学中的ELSI,而不仅仅局限于最初的测试适应症,并将基因组学纳入医疗保健的主流。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Genetics in Medicine
Genetics in Medicine 医学-遗传学
CiteScore
15.20
自引率
6.80%
发文量
857
审稿时长
1.3 weeks
期刊介绍: Genetics in Medicine (GIM) is the official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics. The journal''s mission is to enhance the knowledge, understanding, and practice of medical genetics and genomics through publications in clinical and laboratory genetics and genomics, including ethical, legal, and social issues as well as public health. GIM encourages research that combats racism, includes diverse populations and is written by authors from diverse and underrepresented backgrounds.
期刊最新文献
The "Genetic Test Request": A genomic stewardship intervention for inpatient exome and genome orders at a tertiary pediatric hospital. Payer Perspectives on Genomic Testing in the United States: A systematic literature review. Offering complex genomic screening in acute pediatric settings: family decision-making and outcomes. Upregulation vs. loss of function of NTRK2 in 44 affected individuals leads to two distinct neurodevelopmental disorders. Correspondence on "Weighty matters: Considering the ethics of genetic risk scores for obesity" by C. Houtz.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1