Utilization of a SNP microarray to detect uniparental disomy: Implications and outcomes

IF 6.6 1区 医学 Q1 GENETICS & HEREDITY Genetics in Medicine Pub Date : 2024-09-19 DOI:10.1016/j.gim.2024.101275
Alexandra Arreola, Gloria Haskell, Inder Gadi, Andrea Penton, Stuart Schwartz
{"title":"Utilization of a SNP microarray to detect uniparental disomy: Implications and outcomes","authors":"Alexandra Arreola,&nbsp;Gloria Haskell,&nbsp;Inder Gadi,&nbsp;Andrea Penton,&nbsp;Stuart Schwartz","doi":"10.1016/j.gim.2024.101275","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To examine the utility of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) microarray analysis to detect uniparental disomy (UPD) by utilizing trios and duos (for which only 1 parent is available).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We established Mendelian Inheritance Error (MIE) values associated with either UPD or biparental inheritance in a cohort of 124 patients. In duos, the percentage of proband heterozygous (AB) SNPs contributed from the parent submitted was also used to detect UPD.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Examination of 25 trios revealed UPD with a MIE = 0.02 +/− 0.02 and a range of 0.01 to 0.23 for the contributing parent and a MIE = 8.76 +/− 1.68 with a range of 5.96 to 11.14 for the noncontributing parent. Detailed examination of 13 duos (involving 16 chromosomes) showed an AB% = 52.0% +/− 4.85% consistent with biparental origin of the chromosome of interest. In 6 duos (6 chromosomes), the AB% = 97.2% +/− 2.6% and a range of 92.9% to 99.4% were consistent with UPD.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Our results demonstrate utility of a SNP microarray to detect UPD. Distinct MIE ranges were observed that defined UPD or biparental inheritance. In duos, the AB% calculation effectively detected UPD. The diagnostic yield for UPD testing is significantly decreased when large regions of homozygosity are not detected by routine microarray analysis, which has implications for UPD test ordering practices.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12717,"journal":{"name":"Genetics in Medicine","volume":"26 12","pages":"Article 101275"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genetics in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1098360024002090","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

To examine the utility of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) microarray analysis to detect uniparental disomy (UPD) by utilizing trios and duos (for which only 1 parent is available).

Methods

We established Mendelian Inheritance Error (MIE) values associated with either UPD or biparental inheritance in a cohort of 124 patients. In duos, the percentage of proband heterozygous (AB) SNPs contributed from the parent submitted was also used to detect UPD.

Results

Examination of 25 trios revealed UPD with a MIE = 0.02 +/− 0.02 and a range of 0.01 to 0.23 for the contributing parent and a MIE = 8.76 +/− 1.68 with a range of 5.96 to 11.14 for the noncontributing parent. Detailed examination of 13 duos (involving 16 chromosomes) showed an AB% = 52.0% +/− 4.85% consistent with biparental origin of the chromosome of interest. In 6 duos (6 chromosomes), the AB% = 97.2% +/− 2.6% and a range of 92.9% to 99.4% were consistent with UPD.

Conclusion

Our results demonstrate utility of a SNP microarray to detect UPD. Distinct MIE ranges were observed that defined UPD or biparental inheritance. In duos, the AB% calculation effectively detected UPD. The diagnostic yield for UPD testing is significantly decreased when large regions of homozygosity are not detected by routine microarray analysis, which has implications for UPD test ordering practices.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用 SNP 微阵列检测单亲畸形:影响和结果。
目的:研究单核苷酸多态性 (SNP)研究单核苷酸多态性(SNP)微阵列分析在检测单亲裂殖症(UPD)方面的实用性,方法是利用三联体和二联体(只有父母一方可用):我们在一组 124 名患者中确定了与 UPD 或双亲遗传相关的孟德尔遗传错误 (MIE) 值。在双亲遗传中,提交的父母所贡献的概率性杂合(AB)SNPs 的百分比也用于检测 UPD:结果:对 25 例三联病例进行检查后发现,有贡献的父或母的 UPD MIE = 0.02 +/- 0.02,范围为 0.01 - 0.23;无贡献的父或母的 UPD MIE = 8.76 +/- 1.68,范围为 5.96 - 11.14。对 13 个双生子(涉及 16 条染色体)的详细检查显示,AB% = 52.0% +/-4.85% 与相关染色体的双亲来源一致。6对(6条染色体)的AB% = 97.2% +/- 2.6%和92.9% - 99.4%的范围与UPD一致:我们的研究结果证明了 SNP 微阵列检测 UPD 的实用性。我们观察到了不同的 MIE 范围,这些范围确定了 UPD 或双亲遗传。在双亲中,AB%计算能有效检测出UPD。如果常规微阵列分析不能检测到大面积的同源性区域,那么UPD检测的诊断率就会明显下降,这对UPD检测的订购实践有一定的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Genetics in Medicine
Genetics in Medicine 医学-遗传学
CiteScore
15.20
自引率
6.80%
发文量
857
审稿时长
1.3 weeks
期刊介绍: Genetics in Medicine (GIM) is the official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics. The journal''s mission is to enhance the knowledge, understanding, and practice of medical genetics and genomics through publications in clinical and laboratory genetics and genomics, including ethical, legal, and social issues as well as public health. GIM encourages research that combats racism, includes diverse populations and is written by authors from diverse and underrepresented backgrounds.
期刊最新文献
The "Genetic Test Request": A genomic stewardship intervention for inpatient exome and genome orders at a tertiary pediatric hospital. Payer Perspectives on Genomic Testing in the United States: A systematic literature review. Offering complex genomic screening in acute pediatric settings: family decision-making and outcomes. Upregulation vs. loss of function of NTRK2 in 44 affected individuals leads to two distinct neurodevelopmental disorders. Correspondence on "Weighty matters: Considering the ethics of genetic risk scores for obesity" by C. Houtz.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1