Efficacy of intermittent pneumatic compression on breast cancer-related upper limb lymphedema: a systematic review and meta-analysis in clinical studies.

IF 1.5 3区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Gland surgery Pub Date : 2024-08-31 Epub Date: 2024-08-28 DOI:10.21037/gs-24-123
Shengqun Hou, Yun Li, Weiwu Lu, Xiaoju Zhang, Huiyu Luo, Jiajia Qiu, Zhenqi Lu
{"title":"Efficacy of intermittent pneumatic compression on breast cancer-related upper limb lymphedema: a systematic review and meta-analysis in clinical studies.","authors":"Shengqun Hou, Yun Li, Weiwu Lu, Xiaoju Zhang, Huiyu Luo, Jiajia Qiu, Zhenqi Lu","doi":"10.21037/gs-24-123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Complete decongestive therapy (CDT) and intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC) are the most common combination of treatments in breast cancer-related upper limb lymphedema. The effects of IPC as an addition to CDT are inconsistent in different studies. This meta-analysis aimed to explore whether IPC could bring additional benefits to CDT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Literatures were retrieved from databases with full-text publications ranging from January 1995 to March 2024. Fixed-effect models were applied to subsequent analysis if no heterogeneity was detected by using the Inverse formula. Publication bias was assessed using the Begg's test and Eagger's test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve studies were finally included for further analysis. Results showed that additional application of IPC to CDT could further improve lymphedema within 4 weeks after the treatment period [standard mean difference (SMD) =-0.2 mL, 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.33 to -0.07 mL]. However, this additional benefit was weakened within about 9.4±2.6 weeks' follow-up duration after ceasing physical therapy (SMD =-0.15 mL, 95% CI: -0.33 to 0.04 mL).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Periodically continuous treatment should be suggested to maintain the effect of CDT + IPC to promote lymph drainage and lymphedema improvement. Nonetheless, the treatment involved in the studies ranged from 4 to 12 weeks, therefore potential bias might exist.</p>","PeriodicalId":12760,"journal":{"name":"Gland surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11399013/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gland surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/gs-24-123","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Complete decongestive therapy (CDT) and intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC) are the most common combination of treatments in breast cancer-related upper limb lymphedema. The effects of IPC as an addition to CDT are inconsistent in different studies. This meta-analysis aimed to explore whether IPC could bring additional benefits to CDT.

Methods: Literatures were retrieved from databases with full-text publications ranging from January 1995 to March 2024. Fixed-effect models were applied to subsequent analysis if no heterogeneity was detected by using the Inverse formula. Publication bias was assessed using the Begg's test and Eagger's test.

Results: Twelve studies were finally included for further analysis. Results showed that additional application of IPC to CDT could further improve lymphedema within 4 weeks after the treatment period [standard mean difference (SMD) =-0.2 mL, 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.33 to -0.07 mL]. However, this additional benefit was weakened within about 9.4±2.6 weeks' follow-up duration after ceasing physical therapy (SMD =-0.15 mL, 95% CI: -0.33 to 0.04 mL).

Conclusions: Periodically continuous treatment should be suggested to maintain the effect of CDT + IPC to promote lymph drainage and lymphedema improvement. Nonetheless, the treatment involved in the studies ranged from 4 to 12 weeks, therefore potential bias might exist.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
间歇性气压疗法对乳腺癌相关上肢淋巴水肿的疗效:临床研究的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:完全缓解充血疗法(CDT)和间歇性气压疗法(IPC)是治疗乳腺癌相关上肢淋巴水肿最常见的组合疗法。在不同的研究中,IPC作为CDT的补充治疗效果并不一致。本荟萃分析旨在探讨 IPC 是否能为 CDT 带来额外的益处:方法:从数据库中检索 1995 年 1 月至 2024 年 3 月发表的全文文献。如果使用逆公式未发现异质性,则在后续分析中采用固定效应模型。采用 Begg 检验和 Eagger 检验评估发表偏倚:最终纳入了 12 项研究进行进一步分析。结果显示,在 CDT 基础上额外应用 IPC 可进一步改善治疗期后 4 周内的淋巴水肿[标准平均差 (SMD) =-0.2 mL,95% 置信区间 (CI):-0.33 至 -0.07 mL]。然而,在停止物理治疗后约9.4±2.6周的随访时间内,这种额外的益处有所减弱(SMD =-0.15 mL,95% 置信区间:-0.33 至 0.04 mL):结论:为保持 CDT + IPC 促进淋巴引流和改善淋巴水肿的效果,建议定期进行持续治疗。尽管如此,研究中涉及的治疗时间从4周到12周不等,因此可能存在偏差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Gland surgery
Gland surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
113
期刊介绍: Gland Surgery (Gland Surg; GS, Print ISSN 2227-684X; Online ISSN 2227-8575) being indexed by PubMed/PubMed Central, is an open access, peer-review journal launched at May of 2012, published bio-monthly since February 2015.
期刊最新文献
Cardiovascular and fracture events analysis and intervention strategies in patients undergoing parathyroidectomy with secondary hyperparathyroidism. Centralization of adrenal surgeries and improved surgeon volume outcomes. Computed tomography-based radiomics and body composition analysis for predicting clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Early detection of concomitant pancreatic cancer during intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms surveillance. Impact of location and size of minimal extrathyroidal extension on lymph node metastasis in papillary thyroid cancer: a retrospective analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1