Cardiac contractility modulation in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction patients with QRS duration 120–149 ms: Reduction in heart failure hospitalizations and improvement in functional outcome

IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Heart rhythm Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-19 DOI:10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.09.038
Christian Fastner MD , Niraj Varma MD, PhD , Ishu Rao MD , Peter Falk MD , Bjoern Andrew Remppis MD , Kevin Najarian MS , Daniel Burkhoff MD, PhD , Ibrahim Akin MD , Juergen Kuschyk MD
{"title":"Cardiac contractility modulation in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction patients with QRS duration 120–149 ms: Reduction in heart failure hospitalizations and improvement in functional outcome","authors":"Christian Fastner MD ,&nbsp;Niraj Varma MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Ishu Rao MD ,&nbsp;Peter Falk MD ,&nbsp;Bjoern Andrew Remppis MD ,&nbsp;Kevin Najarian MS ,&nbsp;Daniel Burkhoff MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Ibrahim Akin MD ,&nbsp;Juergen Kuschyk MD","doi":"10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.09.038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>A subset of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) patients qualifies for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). However, a 30% CRT nonresponder rate persists, with patients having narrower QRS durations (ie, QRSd 120–149 ms) receiving less or inconsistent benefit. Cardiac contractility modulation (CCM) may be an important alternative therapy option but has largely been evaluated only in HFrEF patients with QRSd &lt;120 ms.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of CCM on HF-related hospitalizations and on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) as well as quality of life in HFrEF patients with QRSd 120–149 ms compared to QRSd &lt;120 ms.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The CCM-REG Registry enrolled a total of 503 HFrEF patients with follow-up up to 2 years. Hospitalization rates were available for 1 year preimplant. Safety was assessed by comparison of actual vs Meta-Analysis Global Group in Chronic Heart Failure (MAGGIC) risk score– or Seattle Heart Failure Model (SHFM)–predicted mortality.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 111 of 455 patients with QRSd 120–149 ms (mean QRSd 130 ± 9 ms; 20% female; age 68 ± 11 years; LVEF 29% ± 9%; 82% New York Heart Association [NYHA] class III), CCM diminished HF-related hospitalization rate by 72% (pre- vs postimplant 0.90 vs 0.25 events per patient-year over 2 years; <em>P</em> &lt;.001). LVEF improved by 7% ± 9% (<em>P</em> = .014 vs baseline), Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire score by 10 ± 23 points (<em>P</em> = .010 vs baseline), and NYHA class by 0.5 ± 0.7 classes (&lt;0.001 vs baseline). The effect sizes were similar to those in QRSd &lt;120 ms patients. Mortality within the first year was 19% in QRSd 120–149 ms patients (ie, not significantly different from the MAGGIC risk score or SHFM prediction).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>CCM significantly improved HF control in NYHA class III HFrEF with reduced ejection fraction patients with moderately prolonged QRSd of 120–149 ms. The effect was comparable to that in patients with QRSd &lt;120 ms.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12886,"journal":{"name":"Heart rhythm","volume":"22 7","pages":"Pages 1756-1762"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart rhythm","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1547527124033666","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

A subset of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) patients qualifies for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). However, a 30% CRT nonresponder rate persists, with patients having narrower QRS durations (ie, QRSd 120–149 ms) receiving less or inconsistent benefit. Cardiac contractility modulation (CCM) may be an important alternative therapy option but has largely been evaluated only in HFrEF patients with QRSd <120 ms.

Objectives

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of CCM on HF-related hospitalizations and on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) as well as quality of life in HFrEF patients with QRSd 120–149 ms compared to QRSd <120 ms.

Methods

The CCM-REG Registry enrolled a total of 503 HFrEF patients with follow-up up to 2 years. Hospitalization rates were available for 1 year preimplant. Safety was assessed by comparison of actual vs Meta-Analysis Global Group in Chronic Heart Failure (MAGGIC) risk score– or Seattle Heart Failure Model (SHFM)–predicted mortality.

Results

Among 111 of 455 patients with QRSd 120–149 ms (mean QRSd 130 ± 9 ms; 20% female; age 68 ± 11 years; LVEF 29% ± 9%; 82% New York Heart Association [NYHA] class III), CCM diminished HF-related hospitalization rate by 72% (pre- vs postimplant 0.90 vs 0.25 events per patient-year over 2 years; P <.001). LVEF improved by 7% ± 9% (P = .014 vs baseline), Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire score by 10 ± 23 points (P = .010 vs baseline), and NYHA class by 0.5 ± 0.7 classes (<0.001 vs baseline). The effect sizes were similar to those in QRSd <120 ms patients. Mortality within the first year was 19% in QRSd 120–149 ms patients (ie, not significantly different from the MAGGIC risk score or SHFM prediction).

Conclusions

CCM significantly improved HF control in NYHA class III HFrEF with reduced ejection fraction patients with moderately prolonged QRSd of 120–149 ms. The effect was comparable to that in patients with QRSd <120 ms.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对 QRS 持续时间为 120-149 毫秒的心衰患者进行心脏收缩力调节:减少心衰住院次数并改善功能预后。
背景:一部分心力衰竭(HF)患者符合心脏再同步化治疗(CRT)的条件。然而,30% 的 CRT 无应答率持续存在,QRS 波长较窄(即 QRSd 120-149 毫秒)的患者获益较少或获益不一致。CCM 可能是一种重要的替代疗法,但目前大多只针对 QRSd 对象的 HF 患者进行了评估:与 QRSd 相比,主要评估心脏收缩力调节(CCM)对 HF 相关住院治疗的影响,其次是对 QRSd 120-149 ms HF 患者左心室 EF(LVEF)和生活质量的影响:CCM-REG 共纳入 503 名心房颤动患者,随访时间长达 2 年,提供了植入前 1 年的住院率。通过比较实际死亡率与 MAGGIC 评分或 SHFM 预测死亡率来评估安全性:结果:在 111/455 名 QRSd 为 120-149 ms 的受试者中(平均 QRSd 为 130±8 ms,年龄为 68±10 岁,20% 为女性,LVEF 为 29±9%,82% 为 NYHA III 级),CCM 将 HF 相关的住院率降低了 72%(植入前与植入后相比,2 年内每名患者每年的住院率分别为 0.90 与 0.25;P 结论:CCM 显著改善了慢性阻塞性肺病患者的病情控制:对于 QRSd 中度延长至 120-149 毫秒的 NYHA III 期 HFrEF 患者,CCM 能明显改善其对 HF 的控制。其效果与 QRSd
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Heart rhythm
Heart rhythm 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
5.50%
发文量
1465
审稿时长
24 days
期刊介绍: HeartRhythm, the official Journal of the Heart Rhythm Society and the Cardiac Electrophysiology Society, is a unique journal for fundamental discovery and clinical applicability. HeartRhythm integrates the entire cardiac electrophysiology (EP) community from basic and clinical academic researchers, private practitioners, engineers, allied professionals, industry, and trainees, all of whom are vital and interdependent members of our EP community. The Heart Rhythm Society is the international leader in science, education, and advocacy for cardiac arrhythmia professionals and patients, and the primary information resource on heart rhythm disorders. Its mission is to improve the care of patients by promoting research, education, and optimal health care policies and standards.
期刊最新文献
Lead failure and venous occlusion as potential drivers of extraction difficulty. Antidepressant treatment duration and risk of Sudden Cardiac Death: A Nationwide Cohort Study1. Electrogram-guided Pulsed Field Ablation for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: A Prospective Cohort Study. Left atrial appendage occlusion and concomitant catheter ablation procedures. Predictive Value of Notched P Wave for Life-Threatening Arrhythmias in Patients with Brugada Syndrome: Insights from a Multicenter Prospective Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1