Hybrid Biatrial Ablation Versus Catheter Ablation for Patients With Nonparoxysmal Atrial Fibrillation and Enlarged Left Atrium.

Abstract

Objective: There is no consensus on the optimal ablation strategy for nonparoxysmal atrial fibrillation (NPAF) with enlarged left atrium. We aimed to explore whether hybrid ablation (HA) of combined thoracoscopic surgical ablation with catheter ablation (CA) was superior to CA alone in these patients.

Methods: Patients with NPAF and left atrial diameter (LAD) ≥45 mm who underwent hybrid biatrial ablation or CA procedure from June 2014 to July 2021 were included in this study. Propensity score matching was applied to select patients in each group. The primary endpoint was freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmias after procedures.

Results: After propensity score matching, 52 patients with enlarged left atrium (median LAD = 51 mm) were enrolled in each group. The median follow-up was 36 months. The probability of freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmias at 12, 24, and 36 months on antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) was 70.1%, 65.4%, and 62.6% in the HA group and 34.3%, 29.4%, and 22.0% in the CA group, respectively (P < 0.001); off AADs was 57.1%, 52.7%, and 50.0% in the HA group and 25.0%, 16.2%, and 11.5% in the CA group (P < 0.001); on AADs after redo CA was 76.2%, 73.7%, and 73.7% in the HA group and 43.6%, 43.6%, and 38.2% in the CA group, respectively (P < 0.001); off AADs after redo CA was 62.5%, 60.1%, and 60.1% in the HA group and 30.4%, 25.1%, and 20.9% in the CA group, respectively (P < 0.001).

Conclusions: For patients with NPAF and enlarged left atrium, hybrid biatrial ablation was superior to CA in sinus rhythm maintenance even if redo CA was performed.