Optimal Positive End-expiratory Pressure Levels in Tuberculosis-associated Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.

IF 1.6 Q4 INFECTIOUS DISEASES International Journal of Mycobacteriology Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-14 DOI:10.4103/ijmy.ijmy_136_24
Seyed MohammadReza Hashemian, Batoul Khoundabi, Ashkan Bahrami, Hamidreza Jamaati, Mohammad Varahram, Leila Saljoughi, Payam Rahimi, Reza Eshraghi
{"title":"Optimal Positive End-expiratory Pressure Levels in Tuberculosis-associated Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.","authors":"Seyed MohammadReza Hashemian, Batoul Khoundabi, Ashkan Bahrami, Hamidreza Jamaati, Mohammad Varahram, Leila Saljoughi, Payam Rahimi, Reza Eshraghi","doi":"10.4103/ijmy.ijmy_136_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The objective is to assess lung compliance and identify the optimal positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) levels in patients with tuberculosis-associated Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (TB-ARDS) compared to non-TB-ARDS patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This observational case-control study utilized electrical impedance tomography to evaluate lung mechanics in 20 TB-ARDS and 20 non-TB-ARDS patients. Participants underwent PEEP titration from 23 to 5 cm H2O in 2 cm H2O decrements. Lung compliance and the rates of hyperdistention and collapse were assessed at each PEEP level.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Delta impedance values showed higher amounts in a PEEP range of 11-17 cm H2O and in patients with TB-ARDS (P > 0.05). In addition, both hyperdistention and collapse rates were nonsignificantly higher in TB-ARDS patients (P > 0.05), and the compromised levels of hyperdistention and collapse rates were at 15-17 cm H2O, indicating the most favorable PEEP level.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The observed patterns of hyperdistention and collapse rates across various PEEP levels provide valuable insights into the susceptibility of TB-ARDS patients to barotrauma. Notably, the identified optimal PEEP range between 15 and 17 cm H2O may guide ventilator management strategies in mitigating both hyperdistention and collapse; nonetheless, due to the high variability of lung compliances within groups, we strongly recommend individualized consideration for tailored respiratory support and evaluation.</p>","PeriodicalId":14133,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Mycobacteriology","volume":"13 3","pages":"247-251"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Mycobacteriology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijmy.ijmy_136_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The objective is to assess lung compliance and identify the optimal positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) levels in patients with tuberculosis-associated Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (TB-ARDS) compared to non-TB-ARDS patients.

Methods: This observational case-control study utilized electrical impedance tomography to evaluate lung mechanics in 20 TB-ARDS and 20 non-TB-ARDS patients. Participants underwent PEEP titration from 23 to 5 cm H2O in 2 cm H2O decrements. Lung compliance and the rates of hyperdistention and collapse were assessed at each PEEP level.

Results: Delta impedance values showed higher amounts in a PEEP range of 11-17 cm H2O and in patients with TB-ARDS (P > 0.05). In addition, both hyperdistention and collapse rates were nonsignificantly higher in TB-ARDS patients (P > 0.05), and the compromised levels of hyperdistention and collapse rates were at 15-17 cm H2O, indicating the most favorable PEEP level.

Conclusions: The observed patterns of hyperdistention and collapse rates across various PEEP levels provide valuable insights into the susceptibility of TB-ARDS patients to barotrauma. Notably, the identified optimal PEEP range between 15 and 17 cm H2O may guide ventilator management strategies in mitigating both hyperdistention and collapse; nonetheless, due to the high variability of lung compliances within groups, we strongly recommend individualized consideration for tailored respiratory support and evaluation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肺结核相关急性呼吸窘迫综合征的最佳呼气末正压水平。
背景:目的是评估肺顺应性,并确定肺结核相关性急性呼吸窘迫综合征(TB-ARDS)患者与非 TB-ARDS 患者相比的最佳呼气末正压(PEEP)水平:这项观察性病例对照研究利用电阻抗断层扫描评估了 20 名肺结核相关急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者和 20 名非肺结核相关急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者的肺力学状况。参与者的 PEEP 值从 23 厘米 H2O 到 5 厘米 H2O,以 2 厘米 H2O 为单位递减。评估了每个 PEEP 水平下的肺顺应性、过度滞留率和塌陷率:结果:Delta 阻抗值在 PEEP 11-17 cm H2O 范围内和 TB-ARDS 患者中显示较高(P > 0.05)。此外,TB-ARDS 患者的超滞留率和塌陷率均无显著性差异(P > 0.05),超滞留率和塌陷率的最低水平为 15-17 cm H2O,这表明 PEEP 水平是最有利的:结论:在不同 PEEP 水平下观察到的过度滞留和塌陷率模式为了解肺结核-ARDS 患者对气压创伤的易感性提供了有价值的见解。值得注意的是,在 15 到 17 cm H2O 之间确定的最佳 PEEP 范围可指导呼吸机管理策略,以减轻过度滞留和塌陷;然而,由于组内肺顺应性的高度变异性,我们强烈建议个体化考虑定制呼吸支持和评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
25.00%
发文量
62
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊最新文献
Methods for the Inactivation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis: a Systematic Review of the Literature. Molecular Identification of Mycobacterium leprae in the Leprosy Patients. Optimal Positive End-expiratory Pressure Levels in Tuberculosis-associated Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. Prevalence and Temporal Trends of Multidrug-resistant Tuberculosis in Iran from 1981 to 2023: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Pyrazinamide-induced Hyperuricemia in Pulmonary Tuberculosis Patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1