Comparison of Metastasectomy and Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Pulmonary Oligometastasis From Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Propensity Score-Weighted Analysis

Young Seob Shin MD , Jae Kwang Yun MD, PhD , Jinhong Jung MD, PhD , Jin-hong Park MD, PhD , Si Yeol Song MD, PhD , Eun Kyung Choi MD, PhD , Sehoon Choi MD, PhD , Hyeong Ryul Kim MD, PhD , Yong-Hee Kim MD, PhD , Dong Kwan Kim MD, PhD , Geun Dong Lee MD, PhD , Sang Min Yoon MD, PhD
{"title":"Comparison of Metastasectomy and Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Pulmonary Oligometastasis From Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Propensity Score-Weighted Analysis","authors":"Young Seob Shin MD ,&nbsp;Jae Kwang Yun MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Jinhong Jung MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Jin-hong Park MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Si Yeol Song MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Eun Kyung Choi MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Sehoon Choi MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Hyeong Ryul Kim MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Yong-Hee Kim MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Dong Kwan Kim MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Geun Dong Lee MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Sang Min Yoon MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.09.022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Although there is a growing role for local therapy in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and pulmonary oligometastasis, it remains unclear whether metastatectomy or stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is the more effective treatment for these patients. We aimed to compare the oncologic outcomes of metastasectomy and SBRT for HCC with pulmonary oligometastasis.</div></div><div><h3>Methods and Materials</h3><div>We retrospectively analyzed 209 patients with HCC with 322 metastatic lung lesions who underwent either metastasectomy (150 patients with 241 lesions) or SBRT (59 patients with 81 lesions) between January 2008 and December 2018. Propensity score-based inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to minimize potential bias between the 2 groups.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The median follow-up duration was 39.8 months (range, 2.3-166.9 months). The 2-year rate of freedom from local progression was 98.2% in the metastasectomy group and 97.0% in the SBRT group (<em>P =</em> .197). The 2-year rates of overt systemic progression-free survival (PFS) (51.0% vs 46.1%; <em>P =</em> .274), PFS (26.3% vs 9.1%; <em>P =</em> .074), and overall survival (OS, 74.0% vs 57.6%; <em>P =</em> .006) were higher in the metastasectomy group. After the probability of treatment weighting adjustment, the 2-year rates of overt systemic PFS (50.8% vs 52.7%; <em>P =</em> .396), PFS (23.0% vs 24.7%; <em>P =</em> .478), and OS (72.6% vs 83.0%, <em>P =</em> .428) were not significantly different between the 2 groups. In multivariate analysis, viable intrahepatic lesions and the number of prior liver-directed therapies were found to be significant prognostic factors for OS and PFS. The time interval between HCC diagnosis and the development of pulmonary metastases was also significantly associated with OS.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Both metastasectomy and SBRT demonstrated excellent local control and comparable oncologic outcomes in patients with pulmonary oligometastasis from HCC. The treatment modality for these patients could be determined based on the individual patient's condition and intrahepatic disease status.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14215,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics","volume":"121 2","pages":"Pages 432-441"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360301624033935","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Although there is a growing role for local therapy in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and pulmonary oligometastasis, it remains unclear whether metastatectomy or stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is the more effective treatment for these patients. We aimed to compare the oncologic outcomes of metastasectomy and SBRT for HCC with pulmonary oligometastasis.

Methods and Materials

We retrospectively analyzed 209 patients with HCC with 322 metastatic lung lesions who underwent either metastasectomy (150 patients with 241 lesions) or SBRT (59 patients with 81 lesions) between January 2008 and December 2018. Propensity score-based inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to minimize potential bias between the 2 groups.

Results

The median follow-up duration was 39.8 months (range, 2.3-166.9 months). The 2-year rate of freedom from local progression was 98.2% in the metastasectomy group and 97.0% in the SBRT group (P = .197). The 2-year rates of overt systemic progression-free survival (PFS) (51.0% vs 46.1%; P = .274), PFS (26.3% vs 9.1%; P = .074), and overall survival (OS, 74.0% vs 57.6%; P = .006) were higher in the metastasectomy group. After the probability of treatment weighting adjustment, the 2-year rates of overt systemic PFS (50.8% vs 52.7%; P = .396), PFS (23.0% vs 24.7%; P = .478), and OS (72.6% vs 83.0%, P = .428) were not significantly different between the 2 groups. In multivariate analysis, viable intrahepatic lesions and the number of prior liver-directed therapies were found to be significant prognostic factors for OS and PFS. The time interval between HCC diagnosis and the development of pulmonary metastases was also significantly associated with OS.

Conclusions

Both metastasectomy and SBRT demonstrated excellent local control and comparable oncologic outcomes in patients with pulmonary oligometastasis from HCC. The treatment modality for these patients could be determined based on the individual patient's condition and intrahepatic disease status.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比较转移灶切除术和立体定向体放射治疗对肝癌肺寡转移的治疗效果:倾向得分加权分析。
目的:虽然局部治疗在肝细胞癌(HCC)和肺寡转移患者中的作用越来越大,但转移灶切除术还是立体定向体放射治疗(SBRT)对这些患者更有效仍不清楚。我们的目的是比较转移灶切除术和 SBRT 治疗伴肺寡转移的 HCC 的肿瘤效果:我们回顾性分析了2008年1月至2018年12月期间接受转移灶切除术(150例,241个病灶)或SBRT(59例,81个病灶)治疗的209例有322个肺转移灶的HCC患者。研究采用了基于倾向评分的治疗逆概率加权(IPTW)方法,以尽量减少两组间的潜在偏倚:中位随访时间为39.8个月(2.3-166.9个月)。转移灶切除术组的2年无局部进展率(FFLP)为98.2%,SBRT组为97.0%(P = 0.197)。转移灶切除术组的2年明显全身无进展生存率(ovPFS,51.0% vs. 46.1%;p = 0.274)、无进展生存率(PFS,26.3% vs. 9.1%;p = 0.074)和总生存率(OS,74.0% vs. 57.6%;p = 0.006)更高。经IPTW调整后,两组的2年ovPFS(50.8% vs. 52.7%;p = 0.396)、PFS(23.0% vs. 24.7%;p = 0.478)和OS(72.6% vs. 83.0%,p = 0.428)率无显著差异。多变量分析发现,肝内存活病灶和既往肝脏导向疗法的次数是影响OS和PFS的重要预后因素。HCC诊断与肺转移发生之间的时间间隔也与OS显著相关:结论:转移灶切除术和SBRT对HCC肺转移灶患者都有很好的局部控制效果和相当的肿瘤治疗效果。这些患者的治疗方式可根据患者的个体情况和肝内疾病状况来决定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
7.10%
发文量
2538
审稿时长
6.6 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Radiation Oncology • Biology • Physics (IJROBP), known in the field as the Red Journal, publishes original laboratory and clinical investigations related to radiation oncology, radiation biology, medical physics, and both education and health policy as it relates to the field. This journal has a particular interest in original contributions of the following types: prospective clinical trials, outcomes research, and large database interrogation. In addition, it seeks reports of high-impact innovations in single or combined modality treatment, tumor sensitization, normal tissue protection (including both precision avoidance and pharmacologic means), brachytherapy, particle irradiation, and cancer imaging. Technical advances related to dosimetry and conformal radiation treatment planning are of interest, as are basic science studies investigating tumor physiology and the molecular biology underlying cancer and normal tissue radiation response.
期刊最新文献
Unresectable Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: Evidence-Based Medicine or a Gut Feeling? Using Evidence-Based Radiation to Protect the Gut (and Other Nearby Important Organs) An Organized Approach to Ablative Radiation Therapy Time to Target Oligometastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Is SABR the Solution?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1