Superior hypogastric nerve plexus (SHNP) block for pain management after minimally invasive gynecology surgeries: A prospective randomized controlled trial.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics Pub Date : 2024-09-23 DOI:10.1002/ijgo.15926
Neha Agrawal, Pratibha Singh, Manu Goyal, Garima Yadav, Shashank Shekhar
{"title":"Superior hypogastric nerve plexus (SHNP) block for pain management after minimally invasive gynecology surgeries: A prospective randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Neha Agrawal, Pratibha Singh, Manu Goyal, Garima Yadav, Shashank Shekhar","doi":"10.1002/ijgo.15926","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Our study aimed to evaluate the effect of superior hypogastric nerve plexus (SHNP) block in postoperative pain management in the first 24 h after minimally invasive gynecological (MIG) surgeries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a double-blinded, randomized controlled trial in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at a tertiary care centre from May 1, 2023 to September 30, 2023 in women undergoing major MIG surgeries. At the completion of the surgery, women were randomized to the intervention group who received SHNP block with ropivacaine 10 mL (0.75%) before port removal, whereas no intervention was taken in the control group. The extubation time was noted, and the pain score was assessed after 1, 2, 6, 12, and 24 h of extubation in the postoperative period using the visual analog scale (VAS). Statistical analysis was done, with a significance level of 0.05, to test the differences between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 64 patients were randomly allocated to intervention and control groups. The median pain score was lower at 1 and 2 h post-extubation and comparable between the two groups at 6, 12, and 24 h. The surrogate markers that is need for additional analgesia and duration of stay did not differ significantly in the two groups, with P-values of 0.08 and 0.943, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although the SHNP group experienced considerably lower immediate postoperative pain levels in the initial hours following extubation, the impact of this benefit remains uncertain in the longer postoperative period. The effectiveness of this modality for pain control needs further study, particularly at later postoperative hours.</p>","PeriodicalId":14164,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.15926","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Our study aimed to evaluate the effect of superior hypogastric nerve plexus (SHNP) block in postoperative pain management in the first 24 h after minimally invasive gynecological (MIG) surgeries.

Methods: We conducted a double-blinded, randomized controlled trial in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at a tertiary care centre from May 1, 2023 to September 30, 2023 in women undergoing major MIG surgeries. At the completion of the surgery, women were randomized to the intervention group who received SHNP block with ropivacaine 10 mL (0.75%) before port removal, whereas no intervention was taken in the control group. The extubation time was noted, and the pain score was assessed after 1, 2, 6, 12, and 24 h of extubation in the postoperative period using the visual analog scale (VAS). Statistical analysis was done, with a significance level of 0.05, to test the differences between the two groups.

Results: A total of 64 patients were randomly allocated to intervention and control groups. The median pain score was lower at 1 and 2 h post-extubation and comparable between the two groups at 6, 12, and 24 h. The surrogate markers that is need for additional analgesia and duration of stay did not differ significantly in the two groups, with P-values of 0.08 and 0.943, respectively.

Conclusion: Although the SHNP group experienced considerably lower immediate postoperative pain levels in the initial hours following extubation, the impact of this benefit remains uncertain in the longer postoperative period. The effectiveness of this modality for pain control needs further study, particularly at later postoperative hours.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于妇科微创手术后疼痛控制的胃上神经丛(SHNP)阻滞:前瞻性随机对照试验。
研究目的我们的研究旨在评估下腹上神经丛(SHNP)阻滞对微创妇科(MIG)手术后24小时内的术后疼痛控制效果:我们于 2023 年 5 月 1 日至 2023 年 9 月 30 日在一家三级医疗中心的妇产科进行了一项双盲随机对照试验,对象是接受大型 MIG 手术的女性。手术结束后,妇女被随机分配到干预组,在拔管前接受罗哌卡因 10 毫升(0.75%)的 SHNP 阻滞,而对照组则不采取任何干预措施。记录拔管时间,并在术后拔管 1、2、6、12 和 24 小时后使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估疼痛评分。对两组之间的差异进行了统计分析,显著性水平为 0.05:共有 64 名患者被随机分配到干预组和对照组。两组患者拔管后 1 小时和 2 小时的中位疼痛评分较低,6 小时、12 小时和 24 小时的中位疼痛评分不相上下:尽管SHNP组在拔管后最初几小时内的术后即刻疼痛程度明显降低,但这一益处在术后较长时间内的影响仍不确定。这种疼痛控制方式的有效性需要进一步研究,尤其是在术后较长时间内。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
2.60%
发文量
493
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics publishes articles on all aspects of basic and clinical research in the fields of obstetrics and gynecology and related subjects, with emphasis on matters of worldwide interest.
期刊最新文献
Routine ultrasound does not improve instrument placement at operative vaginal delivery: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Beyond borders: The global impact of violating reproductive human rights. Trustworthiness criteria for meta-analyses of randomized controlled studies: OBGYN Journal guidelines. Menstrual management using the etonogestrel implant in individuals with intellectual disabilities in Joinville, Brazil. Anticoagulant therapy in pregnant women with mechanical and bioprosthetic heart valves.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1