Financial Toxicity Screening Preferences in Patients With Breast Cancer.

IF 4.7 3区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY JCO oncology practice Pub Date : 2024-09-17 DOI:10.1200/OP.24.00415
Laila A Gharzai, Yingzhe Alex Liu, Zequn Sun, Leila J Mady, Michelle Mohn, Alexis Larson, Sheetal Kircher, Betina Yanez, Ruth C Carlos, John Pottow, Reshma Jagsi, Gelareh Sadigh
{"title":"Financial Toxicity Screening Preferences in Patients With Breast Cancer.","authors":"Laila A Gharzai, Yingzhe Alex Liu, Zequn Sun, Leila J Mady, Michelle Mohn, Alexis Larson, Sheetal Kircher, Betina Yanez, Ruth C Carlos, John Pottow, Reshma Jagsi, Gelareh Sadigh","doi":"10.1200/OP.24.00415","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Financial toxicity is an important issue in cancer that affects quality of life and treatment adherence. Screening can identify patients at risk but consensus on appropriate timing or methods is lacking.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We sent an anonymous survey to e-mail subscribers of a nationwide breast cancer-specific philanthropic organization in July 2023 asking about financial toxicity screening preferences. Frequencies, percentages, and medians were calculated for categorical and continuous variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 5,774 potential participants, 738 respondents with a confirmed cancer diagnosis participated (12.7% response rate). Participants were 93% female (n = 690), had a median age of 50 years (IQR, 44-57), were 57% non-Hispanic White (n = 418), 20% Black/African-American (n = 149), 9.2% Hispanic (n = 68). 93% confirmed a breast cancer diagnosis (n = 689), and 54% were currently undergoing treatment (n = 400). Most indicated not being asked about financial stressors by (58%, n = 425) and not receiving assistance from their care team (68%, n = 498). Most preferred for providers to reach out regarding financial needs (83%, n = 615). Most wished for these discussions to take place early (when first diagnosed [45%, n = 334] or when treatment selected [37%, n = 275]) and to be asked frequently (each appointment [42%, n = 312] or once per month [36%, n = 268]). Participants felt most comfortable discussing financial needs with a social worker or patient/financial navigator (92%, n = 679), in person (75%, n = 553), or via telephone (65%, n = 479).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients in this sample primarily consisting of women with breast cancer desired financial screening to occur early, often, and to be initiated by their providers. Patient preferences can inform optimal implementation of financial toxicity screening practices. Continued work refining best practices for financial toxicity screening should incorporate these patient preferences.</p>","PeriodicalId":14612,"journal":{"name":"JCO oncology practice","volume":" ","pages":"OP2400415"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCO oncology practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/OP.24.00415","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Financial toxicity is an important issue in cancer that affects quality of life and treatment adherence. Screening can identify patients at risk but consensus on appropriate timing or methods is lacking.

Methods: We sent an anonymous survey to e-mail subscribers of a nationwide breast cancer-specific philanthropic organization in July 2023 asking about financial toxicity screening preferences. Frequencies, percentages, and medians were calculated for categorical and continuous variables.

Results: Of 5,774 potential participants, 738 respondents with a confirmed cancer diagnosis participated (12.7% response rate). Participants were 93% female (n = 690), had a median age of 50 years (IQR, 44-57), were 57% non-Hispanic White (n = 418), 20% Black/African-American (n = 149), 9.2% Hispanic (n = 68). 93% confirmed a breast cancer diagnosis (n = 689), and 54% were currently undergoing treatment (n = 400). Most indicated not being asked about financial stressors by (58%, n = 425) and not receiving assistance from their care team (68%, n = 498). Most preferred for providers to reach out regarding financial needs (83%, n = 615). Most wished for these discussions to take place early (when first diagnosed [45%, n = 334] or when treatment selected [37%, n = 275]) and to be asked frequently (each appointment [42%, n = 312] or once per month [36%, n = 268]). Participants felt most comfortable discussing financial needs with a social worker or patient/financial navigator (92%, n = 679), in person (75%, n = 553), or via telephone (65%, n = 479).

Conclusion: Patients in this sample primarily consisting of women with breast cancer desired financial screening to occur early, often, and to be initiated by their providers. Patient preferences can inform optimal implementation of financial toxicity screening practices. Continued work refining best practices for financial toxicity screening should incorporate these patient preferences.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
乳腺癌患者的财务毒性筛查偏好。
目的经济毒性是影响生活质量和治疗依从性的重要癌症问题。筛查可以发现有风险的患者,但对于适当的筛查时机或方法还缺乏共识:我们于 2023 年 7 月向一家全国性乳腺癌慈善组织的电子邮件订阅者发送了一份匿名调查,询问他们对经济毒性筛查的偏好。我们计算了分类变量和连续变量的频率、百分比和中位数:在 5774 名潜在参与者中,有 738 名确诊癌症的受访者参与(回复率为 12.7%)。参与者中 93% 为女性(n = 690),中位年龄为 50 岁(IQR,44-57),57% 为非西班牙裔白人(n = 418),20% 为黑人/非裔美国人(n = 149),9.2% 为西班牙裔(n = 68)。93%的人确诊为乳腺癌(n = 689),54%的人目前正在接受治疗(n = 400)。大多数人表示没有被问及经济压力(58%,n = 425),也没有得到护理团队的帮助(68%,n = 498)。大多数人希望医疗服务提供者就财务需求进行沟通(83%,n = 615)。大多数人希望尽早(首次诊断时 [45%, n = 334] 或选择治疗时 [37%, n = 275])和经常(每次就诊 [42%, n = 312] 或每月一次 [36%, n = 268])进行这些讨论。与社工或患者/财务导航员(92%,n = 679)、本人(75%,n = 553)或通过电话(65%,n = 479)讨论财务需求时,参与者感觉最舒服:该样本中的患者主要是乳腺癌女性患者,她们希望财务筛查能尽早、经常进行,并由其医疗服务提供者发起。患者的偏好可以为财务毒性筛查实践的最佳实施提供参考。在继续完善财务毒性筛查最佳实践的工作中,应将这些患者偏好纳入其中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
7.50%
发文量
518
期刊最新文献
Contextual Framework for Understanding Treatment De-Escalation in Patients With Breast Cancer. Reply to: The Value of Offering Oncofertility Counseling in Young Patients With Newly Diagnosed Cancer Is Unquestionable. The Value of Offering Oncofertility Counseling in Young Patients With Newly Diagnosed Cancer Is Unquestionable. Systemic Therapy for Small Cell Lung Cancer: ASCO Guideline Rapid Recommendation Update Clinical Insights. Clinical Relevance of Intensive Laboratory Monitoring With Standard Venetoclax Ramp-Up for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: A Real-World Experience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1