{"title":"Task-based evaluation of WRMSDs prevailing amongst workers in building construction: An occupational and socioeconomic perspective.","authors":"Madiha Ijaz, Sajid Rashid Ahmad, Muhammad Akram","doi":"10.3233/BMR-240078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The construction of buildings is risky for workers' musculoskeleton.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to calculate the significance of risk associated with work-related musculoskeletal disorders.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>600 workers from 20 construction sites were surveyed using the Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire (modified) and their performance was assessed at seven construction-tasks using RULA and REBA sheets. SPSS v. 26 and R programming were used for statistical analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean value of workers' age was 28.4381 years, with 8.8205 working months/year and 65USDs monthly earnings. Maximum reporting of body discomfort was by workers of window/door framing. Workers' BMI (35-44 kg/m2) and break duration (< 15 minutes) prompted neck pain with OR 7.79 (95% CI 1.135-53.587) and OR 1.179 (95%CI 0.231-6.014) respectively. Bagging was dangerous for the ankle with OR 9.881 (95% CI 5.140-18.994), and window/door framing for feet with OR 2.057 (95% CI 1.196-3.539). The mean value of the RULA grand score ranged from 5.89 (lowest for 'leveling') to 9.25 (highest for 'demolishing'), and the REBA sheet between 8-11 for all seven studied work-stages.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Workers' upper and lower limbs are affected by the work-stages they perform and the social lifestyle they live in. These findings from 600 workers are sufficient to be generalized for intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":15129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/BMR-240078","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The construction of buildings is risky for workers' musculoskeleton.
Objective: This study aims to calculate the significance of risk associated with work-related musculoskeletal disorders.
Method: 600 workers from 20 construction sites were surveyed using the Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire (modified) and their performance was assessed at seven construction-tasks using RULA and REBA sheets. SPSS v. 26 and R programming were used for statistical analysis.
Results: The mean value of workers' age was 28.4381 years, with 8.8205 working months/year and 65USDs monthly earnings. Maximum reporting of body discomfort was by workers of window/door framing. Workers' BMI (35-44 kg/m2) and break duration (< 15 minutes) prompted neck pain with OR 7.79 (95% CI 1.135-53.587) and OR 1.179 (95%CI 0.231-6.014) respectively. Bagging was dangerous for the ankle with OR 9.881 (95% CI 5.140-18.994), and window/door framing for feet with OR 2.057 (95% CI 1.196-3.539). The mean value of the RULA grand score ranged from 5.89 (lowest for 'leveling') to 9.25 (highest for 'demolishing'), and the REBA sheet between 8-11 for all seven studied work-stages.
Conclusion: Workers' upper and lower limbs are affected by the work-stages they perform and the social lifestyle they live in. These findings from 600 workers are sufficient to be generalized for intervention.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation is a journal whose main focus is to present relevant information about the interdisciplinary approach to musculoskeletal rehabilitation for clinicians who treat patients with back and musculoskeletal pain complaints. It will provide readers with both 1) a general fund of knowledge on the assessment and management of specific problems and 2) new information considered to be state-of-the-art in the field. The intended audience is multidisciplinary as well as multi-specialty.
In each issue clinicians can find information which they can use in their patient setting the very next day.