Five-year efficacy outcomes of ocrelizumab in relapsing multiple sclerosis: A propensity-matched comparison of the OPERA studies with other disease-modifying therapies in real-world lines of treatments.

IF 2.6 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of Central Nervous System Disease Pub Date : 2024-09-13 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/11795735241260563
Erwan Muros-Le Rouzic, Yanic Heer, Sean Yiu, Viola Tozzi, Stefan Braune, Philip van Hövell, Arnfin Bergmann, Corrado Bernasconi, Fabian Model, Licinio Craveiro
{"title":"Five-year efficacy outcomes of ocrelizumab in relapsing multiple sclerosis: A propensity-matched comparison of the OPERA studies with other disease-modifying therapies in real-world lines of treatments.","authors":"Erwan Muros-Le Rouzic, Yanic Heer, Sean Yiu, Viola Tozzi, Stefan Braune, Philip van Hövell, Arnfin Bergmann, Corrado Bernasconi, Fabian Model, Licinio Craveiro","doi":"10.1177/11795735241260563","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clinical trials comparing the efficacy of ocrelizumab (OCR) with other disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) other than interferon (IFN) β-1a in relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS) are lacking.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare the treatment effect of OCR vs six DMTs' (IFN β-1a, glatiramer acetate, fingolimod, dimethyl fumarate, teriflunomide, natalizumab) treatment pathways used in clinical practice by combining clinical trial and real-world data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patient-level data from OPERA trials and open-label extension phase, and from the German NeuroTransData (NTD) MS registry, were used to build 1:1 propensity score-matched (PSM) cohorts controlling for seven baseline covariates, including brain imaging activity. Efficacy outcomes were time to first relapse and time to 24-week confirmed disability progression over 5.5 years of follow-up. Intention-to-treat analysis using all outcome data irrespective of treatment switch was applied.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analyses included 611 OPERA patients and 7141 NTD patients. We built 12 paired-matched cohorts (six for each outcome, two for each DMT) to compare efficacy of OCR in OPERA with each DMT treatment pathway in NTD. Post-matching, baseline covariates and PS were well balanced (standardized mean difference <.2 for all cohorts). Over 5.5 years, patients treated with OCR showed a statistically significant reduction in the risk of relapse (hazard ratios [HRs] .30 to .54) and disability progression (HRs .51 to .67) compared with all index therapies and their treatment switching pathways in NTD. Treatment switch and/or discontinuation occurred frequently in NTD cohorts.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>OCR demonstrates superiority in controlling relapses and disability progression in RMS compared with real-world treatment pathways over a 5.5-year period. These analyses suggest that high-efficacy DMTs and high treatment persistence are critical to achieve greatest clinical benefit in RMS.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>OPERA I (NCT01247324), OPERA II (NCT01412333).</p>","PeriodicalId":15218,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Central Nervous System Disease","volume":"16 ","pages":"11795735241260563"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11406495/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Central Nervous System Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11795735241260563","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Clinical trials comparing the efficacy of ocrelizumab (OCR) with other disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) other than interferon (IFN) β-1a in relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS) are lacking.

Objectives: To compare the treatment effect of OCR vs six DMTs' (IFN β-1a, glatiramer acetate, fingolimod, dimethyl fumarate, teriflunomide, natalizumab) treatment pathways used in clinical practice by combining clinical trial and real-world data.

Methods: Patient-level data from OPERA trials and open-label extension phase, and from the German NeuroTransData (NTD) MS registry, were used to build 1:1 propensity score-matched (PSM) cohorts controlling for seven baseline covariates, including brain imaging activity. Efficacy outcomes were time to first relapse and time to 24-week confirmed disability progression over 5.5 years of follow-up. Intention-to-treat analysis using all outcome data irrespective of treatment switch was applied.

Results: The analyses included 611 OPERA patients and 7141 NTD patients. We built 12 paired-matched cohorts (six for each outcome, two for each DMT) to compare efficacy of OCR in OPERA with each DMT treatment pathway in NTD. Post-matching, baseline covariates and PS were well balanced (standardized mean difference <.2 for all cohorts). Over 5.5 years, patients treated with OCR showed a statistically significant reduction in the risk of relapse (hazard ratios [HRs] .30 to .54) and disability progression (HRs .51 to .67) compared with all index therapies and their treatment switching pathways in NTD. Treatment switch and/or discontinuation occurred frequently in NTD cohorts.

Conclusion: OCR demonstrates superiority in controlling relapses and disability progression in RMS compared with real-world treatment pathways over a 5.5-year period. These analyses suggest that high-efficacy DMTs and high treatment persistence are critical to achieve greatest clinical benefit in RMS.

Registration: OPERA I (NCT01247324), OPERA II (NCT01412333).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
奥克雷珠单抗治疗复发性多发性硬化症的五年疗效:OPERA 研究与现实世界中其他疾病修饰疗法的倾向匹配比较。
背景:在复发性多发性硬化症(RMS)中,目前尚缺乏比较奥克立珠单抗(OCR)与干扰素(IFN)β-1a以外的其他疾病修饰疗法(DMTs)疗效的临床试验:结合临床试验和实际数据,比较OCR与六种DMTs(IFN β-1a、醋酸格拉替雷、芬戈莫德、富马酸二甲酯、特利氟胺、纳他珠单抗)在临床实践中的治疗效果:方法:利用OPERA试验和开放标签扩展阶段的患者水平数据,以及德国NeuroTransData(NTD)多发性硬化症登记处的数据,建立1:1倾向得分匹配(PSM)队列,控制包括脑成像活动在内的7个基线协变量。疗效结果为首次复发时间和随访5.5年的24周确诊残疾进展时间。无论治疗转换与否,均使用所有结果数据进行意向治疗分析:分析对象包括 611 名 OPERA 患者和 7141 名 NTD 患者。我们建立了 12 个配对队列(每种结果 6 个队列,每种 DMT 2 个队列),以比较 OPERA 中 OCR 与 NTD 中每种 DMT 治疗途径的疗效。配对后,基线协变量和PS达到了很好的平衡(标准化平均差结论):在 5.5 年的时间里,与现实世界的治疗路径相比,OCR 在控制 RMS 复发和残疾进展方面更具优势。这些分析表明,高疗效 DMTs 和高治疗持续性是 RMS 获得最大临床获益的关键:Opera I (NCT01247324)、Opera II (NCT01412333)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Enriched environment may improve secondary brain injury after traumatic brain injury by regulating the TLR2/NF-κB signaling pathway. Letter re: Aseptic pleocytosis can only be classified as a phenotypic manifestation of MNGIE after exclusion of all differential causes. Decompressive craniectomy versus craniotomy for acute subdural hematoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis with an adjusted subgroup analysis. Hemorrhagic stroke in children. Measurement of cerebral venous oxygenation with quantitative susceptibility mapping after subarachnoid hemorrhage: A pilot study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1