Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography Using an Optimal Acquisition Time Window Based on Heart Rate Determined During Breath-Holding Following Free Breathing.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography Pub Date : 2024-09-19 DOI:10.1097/RCT.0000000000001666
Zi-Yan Liu, Ze-Peng Ma, Kai Gao, Wei Ding, Yong-Xia Zhao
{"title":"Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography Using an Optimal Acquisition Time Window Based on Heart Rate Determined During Breath-Holding Following Free Breathing.","authors":"Zi-Yan Liu, Ze-Peng Ma, Kai Gao, Wei Ding, Yong-Xia Zhao","doi":"10.1097/RCT.0000000000001666","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare the image quality and radiation dose in coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) based on different acquisition time windows corresponding to the heart rate of breath-holding after free breathing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two hundred patients who underwent CCTA with a basal heart rate between 70 and 85 beats/min were divided into groups A and B, with 100 patients in each group. Patients in groups A and B were scanned with the acquisition time window corresponding to the heart rate determined during a breath hold obtained after free breathing and the basal heart rate during free breathing, respectively. Computed tomography (CT) attenuation values of the coronary artery, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were calculated. The subjective image scores of the groups were assessed blindly by 2 experienced physicians using a 4-point system, and score consistency was compared using the κ test. The volume CT dose index and dose-length product were recorded for each patient, and the effective dose (ED) was calculated. The Kruskal-Wallis H test was performed to evaluate differences in age, heart rate, and body mass index. A χ2 test was used to evaluate sex differences. An independent-sample t test was employed to compare objective and subjective data such as dose-length product, volume CT dose index, ED, SNR, CNR, and averaged subjective assessment scores. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No statistically significant differences occurred in sex, age, or body mass index between patients in group A and group B (all P > 0.05). No significant differences occurred in the mean CT values, mean SNR values, mean CNR values, or mean subjective scores of CCTA images between the patients in groups A and B (P > 0.05). The ED values of the patients in group A were 52.93% lower than those in group B (P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The radiation dose in CCTA examinations can be significantly reduced while maintaining image quality by narrowing the acquisition time window for breath-holding after free breathing.</p>","PeriodicalId":15402,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/RCT.0000000000001666","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To compare the image quality and radiation dose in coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) based on different acquisition time windows corresponding to the heart rate of breath-holding after free breathing.

Methods: Two hundred patients who underwent CCTA with a basal heart rate between 70 and 85 beats/min were divided into groups A and B, with 100 patients in each group. Patients in groups A and B were scanned with the acquisition time window corresponding to the heart rate determined during a breath hold obtained after free breathing and the basal heart rate during free breathing, respectively. Computed tomography (CT) attenuation values of the coronary artery, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were calculated. The subjective image scores of the groups were assessed blindly by 2 experienced physicians using a 4-point system, and score consistency was compared using the κ test. The volume CT dose index and dose-length product were recorded for each patient, and the effective dose (ED) was calculated. The Kruskal-Wallis H test was performed to evaluate differences in age, heart rate, and body mass index. A χ2 test was used to evaluate sex differences. An independent-sample t test was employed to compare objective and subjective data such as dose-length product, volume CT dose index, ED, SNR, CNR, and averaged subjective assessment scores. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05.

Results: No statistically significant differences occurred in sex, age, or body mass index between patients in group A and group B (all P > 0.05). No significant differences occurred in the mean CT values, mean SNR values, mean CNR values, or mean subjective scores of CCTA images between the patients in groups A and B (P > 0.05). The ED values of the patients in group A were 52.93% lower than those in group B (P < 0.001).

Conclusion: The radiation dose in CCTA examinations can be significantly reduced while maintaining image quality by narrowing the acquisition time window for breath-holding after free breathing.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
根据自由呼吸后屏气时的心率确定最佳采集时间窗的冠状动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影。
目的:比较冠状动脉计算机断层扫描(CCTA)的图像质量和辐射剂量:比较基于自由呼吸后憋气心率的不同采集时间窗的冠状动脉计算机断层扫描(CCTA)图像质量和辐射剂量:将 200 名基础心率在 70 至 85 次/分之间的 CCTA 患者分为 A 组和 B 组,每组 100 人。A 组和 B 组患者的扫描采集时间窗分别与自由呼吸后憋气时的心率和自由呼吸时的基础心率相对应。计算冠状动脉的计算机断层扫描(CT)衰减值、信噪比(SNR)和对比度与噪声比(CNR)。由两名经验丰富的医生使用 4 分制盲法评估各组的主观图像评分,并使用κ检验比较评分的一致性。记录每位患者的容积 CT 剂量指数和剂量-长度乘积,并计算有效剂量(ED)。采用 Kruskal-Wallis H 检验来评估年龄、心率和体重指数的差异。χ2检验用于评估性别差异。采用独立样本 t 检验比较客观和主观数据,如剂量-长度乘积、容积 CT 剂量指数、ED、SNR、CNR 和平均主观评估分数。统计显著性以 P < 0.05 为标准:结果:A 组和 B 组患者在性别、年龄和体重指数方面均无明显统计学差异(均 P > 0.05)。A 组和 B 组患者的平均 CT 值、平均 SNR 值、平均 CNR 值或 CCTA 图像的平均主观评分均无明显差异(P > 0.05)。A组患者的ED值比B组低52.93%(P<0.001):结论:通过缩小自由呼吸后憋气的采集时间窗,可在保持图像质量的同时显著降低 CCTA 检查的辐射剂量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
230
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The mission of Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography is to showcase the latest clinical and research developments in CT, MR, and closely related diagnostic techniques. We encourage submission of both original research and review articles that have immediate or promissory clinical applications. Topics of special interest include: 1) functional MR and CT of the brain and body; 2) advanced/innovative MRI techniques (diffusion, perfusion, rapid scanning); and 3) advanced/innovative CT techniques (perfusion, multi-energy, dose-reduction, and processing).
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of Amide Proton Transfer Imaging Combined With Serum Squamous Cell Carcinoma Antigen for Grading Cervical cancer. Evaluating the Efficacy of Deep Learning Reconstruction in Reducing Radiation Dose for Computer-Aided Volumetry for Liver Tumor: A Phantom Study. Improving Image Quality and Visualization of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Arterial Phase Imaging Using Contrast Enhancement-Boost Technique. Phosphaturic Mesenchymal Tumor and Tumor-Induced Osteomalacia: A Report of 5 Cases, Including 2 Skull Base Cases With Arterial Spin Label Perfusion. Application of a Deep Learning-Based Contrast-Boosting Algorithm to Low-Dose Computed Tomography Pulmonary Angiography With Reduced Iodine Load.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1