Use of UV mutational signatures to distinguish between cutaneous and pulmonary primary squamous cell carcinoma.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 DERMATOLOGY Journal of Cutaneous Pathology Pub Date : 2024-09-15 DOI:10.1111/cup.14713
Jeffrey S Ross, Dean Pavlick, Julie Y Tse, Erik A Williams, Ethan S Sokol, Richard S P Huang, Rami Al-Rohil, David M Jones, Devashish Desai, Stephen Graziano, Alina Basnet
{"title":"Use of UV mutational signatures to distinguish between cutaneous and pulmonary primary squamous cell carcinoma.","authors":"Jeffrey S Ross, Dean Pavlick, Julie Y Tse, Erik A Williams, Ethan S Sokol, Richard S P Huang, Rami Al-Rohil, David M Jones, Devashish Desai, Stephen Graziano, Alina Basnet","doi":"10.1111/cup.14713","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of presumed lung origin (PLO) is now the second most frequent histologic subtype of non-small cell carcinoma after adenocarcinoma. The use of clinic-genomic correlation provided by comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) can revise clinicopathologic diagnoses of presumed primary lung SCC (PLO-SCC) to diagnoses of metastatic SCC of cutaneous origin (C-SCC).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A total of 10 146 samples of clinically advanced PLO-SCC (84% known Stage IV) passed QC metrics and were designated as PLO-SCCs by review of test requisition forms, clinical notes, and pathology reports. One thousand seven hundred sixty-one cases of known primary C-SCC were also included in this study. All samples underwent hybrid capture-based CGP (Foundation Medicine, Inc.) using a targeted gene panel to evaluate all classes of genomic alterations (GA), determine MSI, TMB, and genomic ancestry status. The mutational signature (MS) of each case was called by the decomposition method using reference signatures in the COSMIC database. PD-L1 tumor cell expression was determined by IHC (22C3; Dako). All results were compared using the Fisher exact method with the false discovery rate corrected with a Benjamini-Hochberg adjustment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 253 of 10 146 (2.5%) PLO-SCC cases featured a UV+ MS; 812 of 1761 C-SCC (46.1%) that also featured a UV radiation exposure MS (UV+) were also included in this study. PLO-SCC UV+ cases used for sequencing included tissue samples from the lung (162), lymph node (34), soft tissue (33), liver (8), head and neck (7), brain (5), and skin thought to be metastatic sites from primary lung SCC (4). The PLO-SCC UV+ patients were 78.7% male and had a median age of 72 years, which was younger and more frequently male gender than both the C-SCC UV+ and C-SCC UV- patients (p < 0.0001). Both the PLO-SCC UV+ and C-SCC UV+ featured greater GA per tumor than the PLO-SCC UV- cases (p < 0.0001). In the PLO-SCC UV- cases, tobacco exposure and APOBEC were the most frequent MSs. For the biomarkers associated with immune checkpoint inhibitor efficacy, when compared with the PLO-SCC UV- cases, the PLO-SCC UV+ cases featured more cases with TMB ≥10 mutations/Mb (88.5% vs. 36.5%; p < 0.0001) and ≥20 mutations/Mb (66.8% vs. 6.8%; p < 0.0001) and a trend for less frequent positive PD-L1 (≥50% TPS) IHC staining (30.2% vs. 39.6%; p = 0.062). Compared to PLO-SCC UV- cases, PLO-SCC UV+ and C-SCC UV+ cases were more likely to harbor clinically-actionable GA in PTCH1 and NOTCH1/2 (p < 0.0001) and less likely to harbor clinically-actionable GA in KRAS, PIK3CA, and PTEN (p < 0.0001). The frequency of PTCH1 GA in PLO-SCC UV+ (32% vs. 0.9% in PLO-SCC UV-) suggested that PLO-SCC UV+ may include a mixture of C-SCC and cutaneous basal cell carcinomas (C-BCC) with squamous differentiation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>When cases of PLO-SCC undergo CGP, a small 2.5% subset of cases that featured a UV MS emerge that indicates that these tumors may actually represent metastatic cutaneous SCC or BCC with squamous differentiation. Given the significant treatment and clinical impact associated with the resolution of the true diagnosis of these cases, the use of genomic sequencing in PLO-SCC may be clinically beneficial.</p>","PeriodicalId":15407,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cutaneous Pathology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cutaneous Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/cup.14713","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of presumed lung origin (PLO) is now the second most frequent histologic subtype of non-small cell carcinoma after adenocarcinoma. The use of clinic-genomic correlation provided by comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) can revise clinicopathologic diagnoses of presumed primary lung SCC (PLO-SCC) to diagnoses of metastatic SCC of cutaneous origin (C-SCC).

Design: A total of 10 146 samples of clinically advanced PLO-SCC (84% known Stage IV) passed QC metrics and were designated as PLO-SCCs by review of test requisition forms, clinical notes, and pathology reports. One thousand seven hundred sixty-one cases of known primary C-SCC were also included in this study. All samples underwent hybrid capture-based CGP (Foundation Medicine, Inc.) using a targeted gene panel to evaluate all classes of genomic alterations (GA), determine MSI, TMB, and genomic ancestry status. The mutational signature (MS) of each case was called by the decomposition method using reference signatures in the COSMIC database. PD-L1 tumor cell expression was determined by IHC (22C3; Dako). All results were compared using the Fisher exact method with the false discovery rate corrected with a Benjamini-Hochberg adjustment.

Results: A total of 253 of 10 146 (2.5%) PLO-SCC cases featured a UV+ MS; 812 of 1761 C-SCC (46.1%) that also featured a UV radiation exposure MS (UV+) were also included in this study. PLO-SCC UV+ cases used for sequencing included tissue samples from the lung (162), lymph node (34), soft tissue (33), liver (8), head and neck (7), brain (5), and skin thought to be metastatic sites from primary lung SCC (4). The PLO-SCC UV+ patients were 78.7% male and had a median age of 72 years, which was younger and more frequently male gender than both the C-SCC UV+ and C-SCC UV- patients (p < 0.0001). Both the PLO-SCC UV+ and C-SCC UV+ featured greater GA per tumor than the PLO-SCC UV- cases (p < 0.0001). In the PLO-SCC UV- cases, tobacco exposure and APOBEC were the most frequent MSs. For the biomarkers associated with immune checkpoint inhibitor efficacy, when compared with the PLO-SCC UV- cases, the PLO-SCC UV+ cases featured more cases with TMB ≥10 mutations/Mb (88.5% vs. 36.5%; p < 0.0001) and ≥20 mutations/Mb (66.8% vs. 6.8%; p < 0.0001) and a trend for less frequent positive PD-L1 (≥50% TPS) IHC staining (30.2% vs. 39.6%; p = 0.062). Compared to PLO-SCC UV- cases, PLO-SCC UV+ and C-SCC UV+ cases were more likely to harbor clinically-actionable GA in PTCH1 and NOTCH1/2 (p < 0.0001) and less likely to harbor clinically-actionable GA in KRAS, PIK3CA, and PTEN (p < 0.0001). The frequency of PTCH1 GA in PLO-SCC UV+ (32% vs. 0.9% in PLO-SCC UV-) suggested that PLO-SCC UV+ may include a mixture of C-SCC and cutaneous basal cell carcinomas (C-BCC) with squamous differentiation.

Conclusions: When cases of PLO-SCC undergo CGP, a small 2.5% subset of cases that featured a UV MS emerge that indicates that these tumors may actually represent metastatic cutaneous SCC or BCC with squamous differentiation. Given the significant treatment and clinical impact associated with the resolution of the true diagnosis of these cases, the use of genomic sequencing in PLO-SCC may be clinically beneficial.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用紫外线突变特征区分皮肤原发性鳞状细胞癌和肺原发性鳞状细胞癌。
背景:推测为肺源性的鳞状细胞癌(SCC)目前是继腺癌之后第二大最常见的非小细胞癌组织学亚型。利用综合基因组图谱(CGP)提供的临床-基因组相关性,可将假定原发性肺SCC(PLO-SCC)的临床病理诊断修正为皮肤转移性SCC(C-SCC)的诊断:设计:共有10 146份临床晚期PLO-SCC样本(84%为已知的IV期)通过了质量控制指标,并通过审查检验申请表、临床记录和病理报告被指定为PLO-SCC。本研究还纳入了 1761 例已知的原发性 C-SCC 病例。所有样本都接受了基于混合捕获的 CGP(Foundation Medicine, Inc.利用 COSMIC 数据库中的参考特征,通过分解法调用每个病例的突变特征 (MS)。PD-L1肿瘤细胞表达通过IHC(22C3;Dako)测定。所有结果均采用费雪精确法进行比较,并用本杰明-霍奇伯格调整法校正误发现率:在10 146例PLO-SCC病例中,共有253例(2.5%)具有紫外线+ MS特征;在1761例C-SCC病例中,有812例(46.1%)也具有紫外线辐射暴露MS(UV+)特征。用于测序的 PLO-SCC UV+ 病例包括来自肺部(162 例)、淋巴结(34 例)、软组织(33 例)、肝脏(8 例)、头颈部(7 例)、大脑(5 例)和皮肤的组织样本,这些样本被认为是原发性肺 SCC 的转移部位(4 例)。PLO-SCC 紫外线+患者中,78.7%为男性,中位年龄为 72 岁,与 C-SCC 紫外线+和 C-SCC 紫外线-患者相比,男性更年轻、更多见(P 结论):当对 PLO-SCC 病例进行 CGP 检查时,会发现一小部分 2.5% 的病例具有 UV MS 特征,这表明这些肿瘤实际上可能是鳞状分化的转移性皮肤 SCC 或 BCC。鉴于解决这些病例的真实诊断对治疗和临床的重大影响,在 PLO-SCC 中使用基因组测序可能对临床有益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.90%
发文量
174
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Cutaneous Pathology publishes manuscripts broadly relevant to diseases of the skin and mucosae, with the aims of advancing scientific knowledge regarding dermatopathology and enhancing the communication between clinical practitioners and research scientists. Original scientific manuscripts on diagnostic and experimental cutaneous pathology are especially desirable. Timely, pertinent review articles also will be given high priority. Manuscripts based on light, fluorescence, and electron microscopy, histochemistry, immunology, molecular biology, and genetics, as well as allied sciences, are all welcome, provided their principal focus is on cutaneous pathology. Publication time will be kept as short as possible, ensuring that articles will be quickly available to all interested in this speciality.
期刊最新文献
Martin C. Mihm, Jr. Role in MGH Pigmented Lesion Clinic-50 Years Ago (1973). Study of Microsatellite Instability by Immunohistochemistry in a Cohort of Patients With Melanoma. CIC-DUX4 Sarcoma of the Skin: A Rare Case Report and Literature Review. The Pseudoinflammatory Pattern Revisited. Grading Melanocytic Dysplasia: Updated Histopathologic Criteria.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1