Low Ocular Perfusion Pressure Values at Rest and during Resistance Exercise in Offspring of Glaucoma Patients.

IF 1.2 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY Journal of Current Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2024-08-10 eCollection Date: 2023-10-01 DOI:10.4103/joco.joco_207_23
Diana de Medeiros Andrade, Jordane Benedito Vargas Oliveira, Marta Halfeld Ferrari Alves Lacordia, Mateus Camaroti Laterza, Daniel Godoy Martinez
{"title":"Low Ocular Perfusion Pressure Values at Rest and during Resistance Exercise in Offspring of Glaucoma Patients.","authors":"Diana de Medeiros Andrade, Jordane Benedito Vargas Oliveira, Marta Halfeld Ferrari Alves Lacordia, Mateus Camaroti Laterza, Daniel Godoy Martinez","doi":"10.4103/joco.joco_207_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the ocular perfusion pressure (OPP) response during physical exercise in individuals with and without a family history (FH+, FH-) of glaucoma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-four subjects, divided into FH+ and FH- groups, realized 3 min at rest, 3 min of isometric handgrip exercise at 30% of maximal voluntary contraction, followed by 3 min of recovery. Blood pressure (Dixtal<sup>®</sup> automatic device) and intraocular pressure (Goldmann applanation tonometer) were measured during rest, exercise, and recovery. The mean OPP (mOPP) was calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the FH+ group (17 subjects), baseline mOPP values were significantly lower than in the FH- group (17 subjects) (right eye: <i>P</i> < 0.001, left eye: <i>P</i> < 0.001, respectively). During exercise, both the FH+ and FH- groups showed a similar increase in mOPP in both eyes (right eye: FH+: 38 ± 4 mmHg vs. 51 ± 7 mmHg, FH-: 48 ± 5 mmHg vs. 57 ± 9 mmHg, <i>P</i> < 0.001; left eye: FH+: 39 ± 3 mmHg vs. 51 ± 7 mmHg; FH-: 46 ± 5 mmHg vs. 58 ± 8 mmHg, <i>P</i> < 0.001, respectively). However, the FH+ group maintained significantly lower mOPP values compared to the FH- group in the right and left eyes (group effect: <i>P</i> = 0.002, <i>P</i> = 0.002, respectively). The percentage of increase in mOPP in the FH+ group was greater compared to the FH- group during exercise (right eye: 34.1% ± 15.9% vs. 22.1% ± 13.2%, respectively; <i>P</i> = 0.025; left eye: 33.2% ± 17.7% vs. 22.4% ± 13.7%, respectively, <i>P</i> = 0.056).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>mOPP increased during physical exercise in both groups, but the FH+ group had lower absolute values. In addition, the FH+ group appears to demonstrate a higher percentage increase in mOPP compared to the FH- group.</p>","PeriodicalId":15423,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Current Ophthalmology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11392303/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Current Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/joco.joco_207_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the ocular perfusion pressure (OPP) response during physical exercise in individuals with and without a family history (FH+, FH-) of glaucoma.

Methods: Thirty-four subjects, divided into FH+ and FH- groups, realized 3 min at rest, 3 min of isometric handgrip exercise at 30% of maximal voluntary contraction, followed by 3 min of recovery. Blood pressure (Dixtal® automatic device) and intraocular pressure (Goldmann applanation tonometer) were measured during rest, exercise, and recovery. The mean OPP (mOPP) was calculated.

Results: In the FH+ group (17 subjects), baseline mOPP values were significantly lower than in the FH- group (17 subjects) (right eye: P < 0.001, left eye: P < 0.001, respectively). During exercise, both the FH+ and FH- groups showed a similar increase in mOPP in both eyes (right eye: FH+: 38 ± 4 mmHg vs. 51 ± 7 mmHg, FH-: 48 ± 5 mmHg vs. 57 ± 9 mmHg, P < 0.001; left eye: FH+: 39 ± 3 mmHg vs. 51 ± 7 mmHg; FH-: 46 ± 5 mmHg vs. 58 ± 8 mmHg, P < 0.001, respectively). However, the FH+ group maintained significantly lower mOPP values compared to the FH- group in the right and left eyes (group effect: P = 0.002, P = 0.002, respectively). The percentage of increase in mOPP in the FH+ group was greater compared to the FH- group during exercise (right eye: 34.1% ± 15.9% vs. 22.1% ± 13.2%, respectively; P = 0.025; left eye: 33.2% ± 17.7% vs. 22.4% ± 13.7%, respectively, P = 0.056).

Conclusions: mOPP increased during physical exercise in both groups, but the FH+ group had lower absolute values. In addition, the FH+ group appears to demonstrate a higher percentage increase in mOPP compared to the FH- group.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
青光眼患者后代在静息和阻力运动时的低眼部灌注压值
目的:比较有和没有青光眼家族史(FH+、FH-)的人在体育锻炼时眼部灌注压(OPP)的反应:34 名受试者分为 FH+ 组和 FH- 组,分别进行 3 分钟静息、3 分钟等长手握运动(最大自主收缩量的 30%)和 3 分钟恢复运动。在休息、运动和恢复过程中测量血压(Dixtal® 自动设备)和眼压(Goldmann 眼压计)。结果:结果:FH+ 组(17 名受试者)的 mOPP 基线值明显低于 FH- 组(17 名受试者)(右眼:P < 0.001,左眼:P < 0.001)。在运动过程中,FH+ 组和 FH- 组双眼的 mOPP 值都出现了相似的增长(右眼:P < 0.001;左眼:P < 0.001;右眼:P < 0.001):右眼:FH+:38 ± 4 mmHg vs. 51 ± 7 mmHg,FH-:48 ± 5 mmHg vs. 51 ± 7 mmHg:48 ± 5 mmHg vs. 57 ± 9 mmHg,P < 0.001;左眼:FH+: 39 ± 3 mmHg vs. 51 ± 7 mmHg; FH-:分别为 46 ± 5 mmHg vs. 58 ± 8 mmHg,P < 0.001)。然而,与 FH- 组相比,FH+ 组左右眼的 mOPP 值明显较低(组间效应:分别为 P = 0.002 和 P = 0.002)。与 FH- 组相比,FH+ 组在运动时 mOPP 增加的百分比更高(右眼:34.1% ± 15.9% ,左眼:34.1% ± 15.9% ,右眼:34.1% ± 15.9% ):分别为 34.1% ± 15.9% vs. 22.1% ± 13.2%;P = 0.025;左眼:结论:两组患者在运动时 mOPP 均增加,但 FH+ 组的绝对值较低。此外,与 FH- 组相比,FH+ 组的 mOPP 增加百分比更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
6.70%
发文量
45
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Peer Review under the responsibility of Iranian Society of Ophthalmology Journal of Current Ophthalmology, the official publication of the Iranian Society of Ophthalmology, is a peer-reviewed, open-access, scientific journal that welcomes high quality original articles related to vision science and all fields of ophthalmology. Journal of Current Ophthalmology is the continuum of Iranian Journal of Ophthalmology published since 1969.
期刊最新文献
Erratum: Intracameral Injection of Methotrexate for Treatment of Epithelial Ingrowth. Hereditary Multiple Exostoses with Rare Ocular Finding: A Case Report. Iris-Claw Anterior Chamber Phakic Intraocular Lens Explantation: A Case Series. Long-Term Surgical Outcomes of Bilateral Symmetrical Superior Oblique Nasal Tenotomy in Patients of Large A-Pattern Exotropia. Low Ocular Perfusion Pressure Values at Rest and during Resistance Exercise in Offspring of Glaucoma Patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1