Diana de Medeiros Andrade, Jordane Benedito Vargas Oliveira, Marta Halfeld Ferrari Alves Lacordia, Mateus Camaroti Laterza, Daniel Godoy Martinez
{"title":"Low Ocular Perfusion Pressure Values at Rest and during Resistance Exercise in Offspring of Glaucoma Patients.","authors":"Diana de Medeiros Andrade, Jordane Benedito Vargas Oliveira, Marta Halfeld Ferrari Alves Lacordia, Mateus Camaroti Laterza, Daniel Godoy Martinez","doi":"10.4103/joco.joco_207_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the ocular perfusion pressure (OPP) response during physical exercise in individuals with and without a family history (FH+, FH-) of glaucoma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-four subjects, divided into FH+ and FH- groups, realized 3 min at rest, 3 min of isometric handgrip exercise at 30% of maximal voluntary contraction, followed by 3 min of recovery. Blood pressure (Dixtal<sup>®</sup> automatic device) and intraocular pressure (Goldmann applanation tonometer) were measured during rest, exercise, and recovery. The mean OPP (mOPP) was calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the FH+ group (17 subjects), baseline mOPP values were significantly lower than in the FH- group (17 subjects) (right eye: <i>P</i> < 0.001, left eye: <i>P</i> < 0.001, respectively). During exercise, both the FH+ and FH- groups showed a similar increase in mOPP in both eyes (right eye: FH+: 38 ± 4 mmHg vs. 51 ± 7 mmHg, FH-: 48 ± 5 mmHg vs. 57 ± 9 mmHg, <i>P</i> < 0.001; left eye: FH+: 39 ± 3 mmHg vs. 51 ± 7 mmHg; FH-: 46 ± 5 mmHg vs. 58 ± 8 mmHg, <i>P</i> < 0.001, respectively). However, the FH+ group maintained significantly lower mOPP values compared to the FH- group in the right and left eyes (group effect: <i>P</i> = 0.002, <i>P</i> = 0.002, respectively). The percentage of increase in mOPP in the FH+ group was greater compared to the FH- group during exercise (right eye: 34.1% ± 15.9% vs. 22.1% ± 13.2%, respectively; <i>P</i> = 0.025; left eye: 33.2% ± 17.7% vs. 22.4% ± 13.7%, respectively, <i>P</i> = 0.056).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>mOPP increased during physical exercise in both groups, but the FH+ group had lower absolute values. In addition, the FH+ group appears to demonstrate a higher percentage increase in mOPP compared to the FH- group.</p>","PeriodicalId":15423,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Current Ophthalmology","volume":"35 4","pages":"320-325"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11392303/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Current Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/joco.joco_207_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: To compare the ocular perfusion pressure (OPP) response during physical exercise in individuals with and without a family history (FH+, FH-) of glaucoma.
Methods: Thirty-four subjects, divided into FH+ and FH- groups, realized 3 min at rest, 3 min of isometric handgrip exercise at 30% of maximal voluntary contraction, followed by 3 min of recovery. Blood pressure (Dixtal® automatic device) and intraocular pressure (Goldmann applanation tonometer) were measured during rest, exercise, and recovery. The mean OPP (mOPP) was calculated.
Results: In the FH+ group (17 subjects), baseline mOPP values were significantly lower than in the FH- group (17 subjects) (right eye: P < 0.001, left eye: P < 0.001, respectively). During exercise, both the FH+ and FH- groups showed a similar increase in mOPP in both eyes (right eye: FH+: 38 ± 4 mmHg vs. 51 ± 7 mmHg, FH-: 48 ± 5 mmHg vs. 57 ± 9 mmHg, P < 0.001; left eye: FH+: 39 ± 3 mmHg vs. 51 ± 7 mmHg; FH-: 46 ± 5 mmHg vs. 58 ± 8 mmHg, P < 0.001, respectively). However, the FH+ group maintained significantly lower mOPP values compared to the FH- group in the right and left eyes (group effect: P = 0.002, P = 0.002, respectively). The percentage of increase in mOPP in the FH+ group was greater compared to the FH- group during exercise (right eye: 34.1% ± 15.9% vs. 22.1% ± 13.2%, respectively; P = 0.025; left eye: 33.2% ± 17.7% vs. 22.4% ± 13.7%, respectively, P = 0.056).
Conclusions: mOPP increased during physical exercise in both groups, but the FH+ group had lower absolute values. In addition, the FH+ group appears to demonstrate a higher percentage increase in mOPP compared to the FH- group.
期刊介绍:
Peer Review under the responsibility of Iranian Society of Ophthalmology Journal of Current Ophthalmology, the official publication of the Iranian Society of Ophthalmology, is a peer-reviewed, open-access, scientific journal that welcomes high quality original articles related to vision science and all fields of ophthalmology. Journal of Current Ophthalmology is the continuum of Iranian Journal of Ophthalmology published since 1969.