Total Cranial Vault Remodelling Versus Minimally Invasive Suturectomy With Postoperative Helmet Therapy in Sagittal Craniosynostosis.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Journal of Craniofacial Surgery Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-19 DOI:10.1097/SCS.0000000000010666
Leonie Witters, Herman Vercruysse, Mania De Praeter
{"title":"Total Cranial Vault Remodelling Versus Minimally Invasive Suturectomy With Postoperative Helmet Therapy in Sagittal Craniosynostosis.","authors":"Leonie Witters, Herman Vercruysse, Mania De Praeter","doi":"10.1097/SCS.0000000000010666","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Different surgical techniques have been explored over time to treat children with scaphocephaly. The objective of this study is to compare morbidity and cosmetic outcomes in total cranial vault remodelling (TCVR) and minimally invasive suturectomy with postoperative helmet therapy (MISPH) in patients with scaphocephaly. The authors performed a retrospective comparative cohort study, including 43 patients with isolated sagittal craniosynostosis who underwent TCVR (n=17) or MISPH (n=26) at the Antwerp University Hospital between April 2008 and December 2022. MISPH was associated with significantly shorter procedure duration (TCVR 199 ± 48 min, MISPH 69 ± 12 min, P <0.001), decreased blood loss (TCVR 610 ± 298 mL, MISPH 85 ± 73 mL, P <0.001) and lower transfusion rate (TCVR 100%, MISPH 54%, P <0.001). Mean length of stay at the intensive care unit and the hospital were significantly shorter after MISPH (TCVR 6 ± 1 d, MISPH 3 ± 0.5 d). The change in CI after TCVR was significantly larger than after MISPH during the first postoperative year. However, the CI in the MISPH group was significantly higher during the first year compared with the TCVR group. Mean CI of the MISPH group reached normal limits during the first year, while in the TCVR group, mean CI reached normal values 5 years after surgery. The authors could not find a statistically significant difference in cosmetic outcome between the 2 groups. The authors conclude that MISPH is associated with decreased morbidity and comparable cosmetic results when compared with TCVR in the treatment of scaphocephaly.</p>","PeriodicalId":15462,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Craniofacial Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"172-176"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Craniofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000010666","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Different surgical techniques have been explored over time to treat children with scaphocephaly. The objective of this study is to compare morbidity and cosmetic outcomes in total cranial vault remodelling (TCVR) and minimally invasive suturectomy with postoperative helmet therapy (MISPH) in patients with scaphocephaly. The authors performed a retrospective comparative cohort study, including 43 patients with isolated sagittal craniosynostosis who underwent TCVR (n=17) or MISPH (n=26) at the Antwerp University Hospital between April 2008 and December 2022. MISPH was associated with significantly shorter procedure duration (TCVR 199 ± 48 min, MISPH 69 ± 12 min, P <0.001), decreased blood loss (TCVR 610 ± 298 mL, MISPH 85 ± 73 mL, P <0.001) and lower transfusion rate (TCVR 100%, MISPH 54%, P <0.001). Mean length of stay at the intensive care unit and the hospital were significantly shorter after MISPH (TCVR 6 ± 1 d, MISPH 3 ± 0.5 d). The change in CI after TCVR was significantly larger than after MISPH during the first postoperative year. However, the CI in the MISPH group was significantly higher during the first year compared with the TCVR group. Mean CI of the MISPH group reached normal limits during the first year, while in the TCVR group, mean CI reached normal values 5 years after surgery. The authors could not find a statistically significant difference in cosmetic outcome between the 2 groups. The authors conclude that MISPH is associated with decreased morbidity and comparable cosmetic results when compared with TCVR in the treatment of scaphocephaly.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
全颅穹重塑术与微创缝合切除术及术后头盔疗法治疗矢状颅畸形。
随着时间的推移,人们探索出了不同的手术技术来治疗患有后颅脑畸形的儿童。本研究旨在比较全颅穹隆重塑术(TCVR)和微创缝合切除术加术后头盔疗法(MISPH)在肩胛畸形患者中的发病率和美容效果。作者进行了一项回顾性队列比较研究,研究对象包括 2008 年 4 月至 2022 年 12 月期间在安特卫普大学医院接受 TCVR(17 人)或 MISPH(26 人)手术的 43 名孤立性矢状颅畸形患者。MISPH的手术时间明显更短(TCVR为199±48分钟,MISPH为69±12分钟,P<0.05)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
11.10%
发文量
968
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: ​The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery serves as a forum of communication for all those involved in craniofacial surgery, maxillofacial surgery and pediatric plastic surgery. Coverage ranges from practical aspects of craniofacial surgery to the basic science that underlies surgical practice. The journal publishes original articles, scientific reviews, editorials and invited commentary, abstracts and selected articles from international journals, and occasional international bibliographies in craniofacial surgery.
期刊最新文献
Clinical Reference Strategy for the Selection of Surgical Treatment for Nonsyndromic Sagittal Craniosynostosis: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis. Education on the Importance of Doctor-patient Communication in Orthodontic Clinical Teaching. Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy in Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction With and Without Dacryocystitis: A Comparative Study. Using Transorbital Sonography for Assessing Traumatic Brain Injury in Patients With Periorbital Hematoma. TMJ Metastasis: Evaluation of 3 Patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1