HIT4HYPOS Continuous Glucose Monitoring Data Analysis: The Effects of High-Intensity Interval Training on Hypoglycemia in People With Type 1 Diabetes and Impaired Awareness of Hypoglycemia.

IF 4.1 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology Pub Date : 2024-09-23 DOI:10.1177/19322968241273845
Catriona M Farrell, Giacomo Cappon, Daniel J West, Andrea Facchinetti, Rory J McCrimmon
{"title":"HIT4HYPOS Continuous Glucose Monitoring Data Analysis: The Effects of High-Intensity Interval Training on Hypoglycemia in People With Type 1 Diabetes and Impaired Awareness of Hypoglycemia.","authors":"Catriona M Farrell, Giacomo Cappon, Daniel J West, Andrea Facchinetti, Rory J McCrimmon","doi":"10.1177/19322968241273845","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To assess the impact of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) on hypoglycemia frequency and duration in people with type 1 diabetes (T1D) with impaired awareness of hypoglycemia (IAH).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Post hoc analysis of four weeks of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) data from HIT4HYPOS; a parallel-group study comparing HIIT + CGM versus no exercise + CGM in 18 participants with T1D and IAH.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>When compared with those participating individuals not exercising, HIIT did not increase total hypoglycemia frequency, <i>T<sub>Hypo(L1)</sub></i> 1.44 [1.00-2.77]% versus 2.53 [1.46-4.23]%; <i>P</i> = .335, <i>T<sub>Hypo(L2)</sub></i> 0.25 [0.09-0.37]% versus 0.45 [0.20-0.78]%; <i>P</i> = .146, HIIT + CGM versus CGM, respectively, rate (<i>EventPerWeek<sub>Hypo</sub></i> 5.30 [3.35-8.27] #/week vs 7.45 [3.54-10.81] #/week, <i>P</i> = .340) or duration (<i>Duration<sub>Hypo</sub></i> 33.33 [27.60-39.10] minutes vs 39.56 [31.00-48.38] minutes; <i>P</i> = .219, HIIT + CGM vs CGM, respectively). There was a reduction in nocturnal hypoglycemia in those who carried out HIIT, <i>T<sub>Hypo</sub></i><sub>(L1)</sub> 0.50 [0.13-0.97]% versus 2.45 [0.77-4.74]%; <i>P</i> = .076; <i>T<sub>Hypo</sub></i><sub>(L2)</sub> 0.00 [0.00-0.03]% versus 0.49 [0.13-0.74]%; <i>P</i> = .006, HIIT + CGM versus CGM, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions/interpretation: </strong>Based on CGM data collected from a real-world study of four weeks of HIIT versus no exercise in individuals with T1D and IAH, we conclude that HIIT does not increase hypoglycemia, and in fact reduces exposure to nocturnal hypoglycemia.</p>","PeriodicalId":15475,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19322968241273845","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: To assess the impact of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) on hypoglycemia frequency and duration in people with type 1 diabetes (T1D) with impaired awareness of hypoglycemia (IAH).

Methods: Post hoc analysis of four weeks of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) data from HIT4HYPOS; a parallel-group study comparing HIIT + CGM versus no exercise + CGM in 18 participants with T1D and IAH.

Results: When compared with those participating individuals not exercising, HIIT did not increase total hypoglycemia frequency, THypo(L1) 1.44 [1.00-2.77]% versus 2.53 [1.46-4.23]%; P = .335, THypo(L2) 0.25 [0.09-0.37]% versus 0.45 [0.20-0.78]%; P = .146, HIIT + CGM versus CGM, respectively, rate (EventPerWeekHypo 5.30 [3.35-8.27] #/week vs 7.45 [3.54-10.81] #/week, P = .340) or duration (DurationHypo 33.33 [27.60-39.10] minutes vs 39.56 [31.00-48.38] minutes; P = .219, HIIT + CGM vs CGM, respectively). There was a reduction in nocturnal hypoglycemia in those who carried out HIIT, THypo(L1) 0.50 [0.13-0.97]% versus 2.45 [0.77-4.74]%; P = .076; THypo(L2) 0.00 [0.00-0.03]% versus 0.49 [0.13-0.74]%; P = .006, HIIT + CGM versus CGM, respectively.

Conclusions/interpretation: Based on CGM data collected from a real-world study of four weeks of HIIT versus no exercise in individuals with T1D and IAH, we conclude that HIIT does not increase hypoglycemia, and in fact reduces exposure to nocturnal hypoglycemia.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
HIT4HYPOS 连续血糖监测数据分析:高强度间歇训练对 1 型糖尿病患者和低血糖意识受损者低血糖的影响。
目的:评估高强度间歇训练(HIIT)对伴有低血糖意识受损(IAH)的1型糖尿病(T1D)患者低血糖发生频率和持续时间的影响:方法:对 HIT4HYPOS 四周连续血糖监测(CGM)数据进行事后分析;这是一项平行分组研究,比较了 HIIT + CGM 与不运动 + CGM 对 18 名患有 T1D 和 IAH 的参与者的影响:结果:与不运动的参与者相比,HIIT没有增加低血糖的总频率,THypo(L1) 1.44 [1.00-2.77]% 对 2.53 [1.46-4.23]%; P = .335, THypo(L2) 0.25 [0.09-0.37]% 对 0.45 [0.20-0.78]%; P = .在这两项研究中,患者的夜间睡眠时间(HIIT + CGM vs CGM,分别为 0.25 [0.09-0.37]% 对 0.45 [0.20-0.78]%; P = .146)、发生率(EventPerWeekHypo 5.30 [3.35-8.27] #/week vs 7.45 [3.54-10.81] #/week,P = .340)或持续时间(DurationHypo 33.33 [27.60-39.10] minutes vs 39.56 [31.00-48.38] minutes; P = .219,HIIT + CGM vs CGM,分别为 0.25 [0.09-0.37]% 对 0.45 [0.20-0.78]%; P = .HIIT + CGM 与 CGM 相比,进行 HIIT 的患者夜间低血糖发生率有所下降,THypo(L1) 0.50 [0.13-0.97]% 与 2.45 [0.77-4.74]% 相比;P = .076;THypo(L2) 0.00 [0.00-0.03]% 与 0.49 [0.13-0.74]% 相比;P = .006:根据对 T1D 和 IAH 患者进行的一项为期四周的 HIIT 与不运动对比的真实世界研究中收集的 CGM 数据,我们得出结论:HIIT 不会增加低血糖,事实上还能减少夜间低血糖的发生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology
Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology Medicine-Internal Medicine
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
12.00%
发文量
148
期刊介绍: The Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology (JDST) is a bi-monthly, peer-reviewed scientific journal published by the Diabetes Technology Society. JDST covers scientific and clinical aspects of diabetes technology including glucose monitoring, insulin and metabolic peptide delivery, the artificial pancreas, digital health, precision medicine, social media, cybersecurity, software for modeling, physiologic monitoring, technology for managing obesity, and diagnostic tests of glycation. The journal also covers the development and use of mobile applications and wireless communication, as well as bioengineered tools such as MEMS, new biomaterials, and nanotechnology to develop new sensors. Articles in JDST cover both basic research and clinical applications of technologies being developed to help people with diabetes.
期刊最新文献
Assessing Battery-Related Challenges in Insulin Pump Therapy: Insights From a Brazilian Diabetes Center. Assessing the Accuracy of a Continuous Glucose Monitoring System Across Varying Exercise Intensities and Blood Lactate Concentrations in Healthy Male Athletes. Older Adults Benefit From Virtual Support for Continuous Glucose Monitor Use But Require Longer Visits. Updated Psychosocial Surveys With Continuous Glucose Monitoring Items for Youth With Type 1 Diabetes and Their Caregivers. Clinical Accuracy of a Glucose Oxidase-Based Blood Glucose Test-Strip Across Extremes of Oxygen Partial Pressure.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1