Human walking biomechanics on sand substrates of varying foot sinking depth.

IF 2.8 2区 生物学 Q2 BIOLOGY Journal of Experimental Biology Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-05 DOI:10.1242/jeb.246787
Barbara F Grant, James P Charles, Kristiaan D'Août, Peter L Falkingham, Karl T Bates
{"title":"Human walking biomechanics on sand substrates of varying foot sinking depth.","authors":"Barbara F Grant, James P Charles, Kristiaan D'Août, Peter L Falkingham, Karl T Bates","doi":"10.1242/jeb.246787","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Our current understanding of human gait is mostly based on studies using hard, level surfaces in a laboratory environment. However, humans navigate a wide range of different substrates every day, which incur varied demands on stability and efficiency. Several studies have shown that when walking on natural compliant substrates there is an increase in energy expenditure. However, these studies report variable changes to other aspects of gait such as muscle activity. Discrepancies between studies exist even within substrate types (e.g. sand), which suggests that relatively 'fine-scale' differences in substrate properties exert quantifiable influences on gait mechanics. In this study, we compared human walking mechanics on a range of sand substrates that vary in overall foot sinking depth. We demonstrated that variation in the overall sinking depth in sand was associated with statistically significant changes in joint angles and spatiotemporal variables in human walking but exerted relatively little influence on pendular energy recovery and muscle activations. Significant correlated changes between gait metrics were frequently recovered, suggesting a degree of coupled or mechanistic interaction in their variation within and across substrates. However, only walking speed (and its associated spatiotemporal variables) correlated frequently with absolute foot sinkage depth within individual sand substrates, but not across them. This suggests that a causative relationship between walking speed and foot sinkage depth within individual sand substates is not coupled with systematic changes in joint kinematics and muscle activity in the same way as is observed across sand substrates.</p>","PeriodicalId":15786,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Biology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.246787","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Our current understanding of human gait is mostly based on studies using hard, level surfaces in a laboratory environment. However, humans navigate a wide range of different substrates every day, which incur varied demands on stability and efficiency. Several studies have shown that when walking on natural compliant substrates there is an increase in energy expenditure. However, these studies report variable changes to other aspects of gait such as muscle activity. Discrepancies between studies exist even within substrate types (e.g. sand), which suggests that relatively 'fine-scale' differences in substrate properties exert quantifiable influences on gait mechanics. In this study, we compared human walking mechanics on a range of sand substrates that vary in overall foot sinking depth. We demonstrated that variation in the overall sinking depth in sand was associated with statistically significant changes in joint angles and spatiotemporal variables in human walking but exerted relatively little influence on pendular energy recovery and muscle activations. Significant correlated changes between gait metrics were frequently recovered, suggesting a degree of coupled or mechanistic interaction in their variation within and across substrates. However, only walking speed (and its associated spatiotemporal variables) correlated frequently with absolute foot sinkage depth within individual sand substrates, but not across them. This suggests that a causative relationship between walking speed and foot sinkage depth within individual sand substates is not coupled with systematic changes in joint kinematics and muscle activity in the same way as is observed across sand substrates.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人在不同下沉深度沙基上的行走生物力学。
我们目前对人类步态的了解大多基于在实验室环境中使用坚硬、平坦表面进行的研究。然而,人类每天都要在各种不同的地面上行走,这就对稳定性和效率提出了不同的要求。有几项研究表明,在自然顺畅的地面上行走时,能量消耗会增加。然而,这些研究报告显示,步态的其他方面(如肌肉活动)也会发生不同的变化。即使是同一类型的基底(如沙地),不同研究之间也存在差异,这表明基底特性的相对 "微小 "差异对步态力学产生了可量化的影响。在本研究中,我们比较了人类在一系列脚部整体下沉深度不同的沙质基底上的行走力学。我们证明,沙地整体下沉深度的变化与人类行走中关节角度和时空变量的统计学显著变化有关,但对垂体能量恢复和肌肉激活的影响相对较小。步态指标之间经常出现显著的相关变化,这表明它们在不同基质内和不同基质间的变化存在一定程度的耦合或机理相互作用。然而,只有行走速度(及其相关的时空变量)与单个沙基质内的绝对脚陷深度经常相关,但在不同沙基质之间却不相关。这表明,在不同的沙质基底中,行走速度与足下沉深度之间的因果关系并不像在不同沙质基底中观察到的那样,与关节运动学和肌肉活动的系统性变化相关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
10.70%
发文量
494
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Experimental Biology is the leading primary research journal in comparative physiology and publishes papers on the form and function of living organisms at all levels of biological organisation, from the molecular and subcellular to the integrated whole animal.
期刊最新文献
How do fish miss? Attack strategies of threespine stickleback capturing non-evasive prey. Hypertonic water reabsorption with a parallel-current system via the glandular and saccular renal tubules of Ruditapes philippinarum. Skittering locomotion in cricket frogs: a form of porpoising. Investigating in vivo force and work production of rat medial gastrocnemius at varying locomotor speeds using a muscle avatar. Bridging the divide in organismal physiology: a case for the integration of behaviour as a physiological process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1