Neighborhood Deprivation and Recovery Following Traumatic Brain Injury Among Older Adults.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2024-09-13 DOI:10.1097/HTR.0000000000001007
Jennifer S Albrecht, Jennifer Kirk, Kathleen A Ryan, Jason R Falvey
{"title":"Neighborhood Deprivation and Recovery Following Traumatic Brain Injury Among Older Adults.","authors":"Jennifer S Albrecht, Jennifer Kirk, Kathleen A Ryan, Jason R Falvey","doi":"10.1097/HTR.0000000000001007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Understanding the extent to which neighborhood impacts recovery following traumatic brain injury (TBI) among older adults could spur targeting of rehabilitation and other services to those living in more disadvantaged areas. The objective of the present study was to determine the extent to which neighborhood disadvantage influences recovery following TBI among older adults.</p><p><p>Setting and Participants: Community-dwelling Medicare beneficiaries aged ≥65 years hospitalized with TBI 2010-2018.</p><p><strong>Design and main measures: </strong>In this retrospective cohort study, the Area Deprivation Index (ADI) was used to assess neighborhood deprivation by linking it to 9-digit beneficiary zip codes. We used national-level rankings to divide the cohort into the top 10% (highest neighborhood disadvantage), middle 11-90%, and bottom 10% (lowest neighborhood disadvantage). Recovery was operationalized as days at home, calculated by subtracting days spent in a care environment or deceased from monthly follow-up over the year post-TBI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 13,747 Medicare beneficiaries with TBI, 1713 (12.7%) were in the lowest decile of ADI rankings and 1030 (7.6%) were in the highest decile of ADI rankings. Following covariate adjustment, beneficiaries in neighborhoods with greatest disadvantage [rate ratio (RtR) 0.96; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.94, 0.98] and beneficiaries in middle ADI percentiles (RtR 0.98; 95% CI 0.97, 0.99) had fewer days at home per month compared to beneficiaries in neighborhoods with lowest disadvantage.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study provides evidence that neighborhood is associated with recovery from TBI among older adults and highlights days at home as a recovery metric that is responsive to differences in neighborhood disadvantage.</p>","PeriodicalId":15901,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HTR.0000000000001007","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Understanding the extent to which neighborhood impacts recovery following traumatic brain injury (TBI) among older adults could spur targeting of rehabilitation and other services to those living in more disadvantaged areas. The objective of the present study was to determine the extent to which neighborhood disadvantage influences recovery following TBI among older adults.

Setting and Participants: Community-dwelling Medicare beneficiaries aged ≥65 years hospitalized with TBI 2010-2018.

Design and main measures: In this retrospective cohort study, the Area Deprivation Index (ADI) was used to assess neighborhood deprivation by linking it to 9-digit beneficiary zip codes. We used national-level rankings to divide the cohort into the top 10% (highest neighborhood disadvantage), middle 11-90%, and bottom 10% (lowest neighborhood disadvantage). Recovery was operationalized as days at home, calculated by subtracting days spent in a care environment or deceased from monthly follow-up over the year post-TBI.

Results: Among 13,747 Medicare beneficiaries with TBI, 1713 (12.7%) were in the lowest decile of ADI rankings and 1030 (7.6%) were in the highest decile of ADI rankings. Following covariate adjustment, beneficiaries in neighborhoods with greatest disadvantage [rate ratio (RtR) 0.96; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.94, 0.98] and beneficiaries in middle ADI percentiles (RtR 0.98; 95% CI 0.97, 0.99) had fewer days at home per month compared to beneficiaries in neighborhoods with lowest disadvantage.

Conclusion: This study provides evidence that neighborhood is associated with recovery from TBI among older adults and highlights days at home as a recovery metric that is responsive to differences in neighborhood disadvantage.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
邻里贫困与老年人创伤性脑损伤后的康复。
目的:了解邻里关系对老年人创伤性脑损伤(TBI)后康复的影响程度,可以促进为生活在较贫困地区的老年人提供有针对性的康复和其他服务。本研究旨在确定邻里劣势对老年人创伤性脑损伤后康复的影响程度:2010-2018年因创伤性脑损伤住院的年龄≥65岁的社区医疗保险受益人:在这项回顾性队列研究中,通过将地区贫困指数(ADI)与 9 位受益人邮政编码相联系来评估邻里贫困程度。我们使用国家级排名将队列分为前 10%(最贫困社区)、中间 11-90% 和后 10%(最贫困社区)。在创伤后一年内的每月随访中减去在护理环境中度过的天数或死亡天数,计算出在家康复的天数:在 13747 名患有创伤性脑损伤的医疗保险受益人中,有 1713 人(12.7%)处于 ADI 排名最低的十分位数,1030 人(7.6%)处于 ADI 排名最高的十分位数。经过协变量调整后,与处境最不利社区的受益人相比,处境最不利社区的受益人[比率比(RtR)为0.96;95%置信区间(CI)为0.94,0.98]和ADI百分位数居中的受益人(RtR为0.98;95% CI为0.97,0.99)每月在家的天数较少:本研究提供的证据表明,邻里关系与老年人从创伤性脑损伤中恢复有关,并强调了居家天数这一恢复指标对邻里弱势差异的反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
153
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation is a leading, peer-reviewed resource that provides up-to-date information on the clinical management and rehabilitation of persons with traumatic brain injuries. Six issues each year aspire to the vision of “knowledge informing care” and include a wide range of articles, topical issues, commentaries and special features. It is the official journal of the Brain Injury Association of America (BIAA).
期刊最新文献
Reciprocal Causation Among Pain, Physical Health, and Mental Health 1 Year Post-Traumatic Brain Injury: A Cross-Lagged Panel Model From the TRACK-TBI Study. Association of Frailty, Comorbidities and Muscularity With GOS and 30-Day Mortality After TBI in Elderly Patients-A Retrospective Study in 1104 Patients. Relationships Between Neighborhood Disadvantage, Race/Ethnicity, and Neurobehavioral Symptoms Among Veterans With Mild Traumatic Brain Injury. Cross-Lagged Associations Among Sleep, Headache, and Pain in Pediatric Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: An A-CAP Study. Evaluating the Implementation of an Occupational Therapy-Led Concussion Clinic Model Into Usual Practice: A Mixed Methods Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1