Seizure Risk Associated With the Use of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Coma Recovery in Individuals With Disordered Consciousness After Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2024-09-05 DOI:10.1097/HTR.0000000000000991
David Ripley, Kelly Krese, Joshua M Rosenow, Vijaya Patil, Stephan Schuele, Marilyn S Pacheco, Eliot Roth, Sandra Kletzel, Sherri Livengood, Alexandra Aaronson, Amy Herrold, Brett Blabas, Runa Bhaumik, Ann Guernon, Catherine Burress Kestner, Elyse Walsh, Dulal Bhaumik, Theresa L Bender Pape
{"title":"Seizure Risk Associated With the Use of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Coma Recovery in Individuals With Disordered Consciousness After Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.","authors":"David Ripley, Kelly Krese, Joshua M Rosenow, Vijaya Patil, Stephan Schuele, Marilyn S Pacheco, Eliot Roth, Sandra Kletzel, Sherri Livengood, Alexandra Aaronson, Amy Herrold, Brett Blabas, Runa Bhaumik, Ann Guernon, Catherine Burress Kestner, Elyse Walsh, Dulal Bhaumik, Theresa L Bender Pape","doi":"10.1097/HTR.0000000000000991","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) is emerging as a promising treatment for persons with disorder of consciousness (DoC) following traumatic brain injury (TBI). Clinically, however, there are concerns about rTMS exacerbating baseline seizure risk. To advance understanding of risks, this article reports evidence of DoC-TBI rTMS-related seizure risk.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Acute and sub-acute hospitals.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Persons in states of DoC 6.5 months to 15 years after TBI (n = 20) who received active rTMS (n = 17) or placebo rTMS (n = 3). After completing placebo procedures, placebo participants completed active rTMS procedures. These 3 participants are included in the active group.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Meta-analysis of data from 3 clinical trials; 2 within-subject, 1 double blind randomized placebo-controlled. Each trial used the same rTMS protocol, provided at least 30 rTMS sessions, and delivered rTMS to the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex.</p><p><strong>Main measures: </strong>During each study's rTMS treatment phase, seizure occurrences were compared between active and placebo groups using logistic regression. After stratifying active group by presence/absence of seizure occurrences, sub-groups were compared using contingency chi-square tests of independence and relative risk (RR) ratios.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two unique participants experienced seizures (1 active, 1 placebo). Post seizure, both participants returned to baseline neurobehavioral function. Both participants received antiepileptics during remaining rTMS sessions, which were completed without further seizures. rTMS-related seizure incidence rate is 59 per 1000 persons. Logistic regression revealed no difference in seizure occurrence by treatment condition (active vs placebo) or when examined with seizure risk factors (P > .1). Presence of ventriculoperitoneal shunt elevated seizure risk (RR = 2.0).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Collectively, findings indicate a low-likelihood that the specified rTMS protocol exacerbates baseline seizure rates in persons with DoC after TBI. In presence of VP shunts, however, rTMS likely elevates baseline seizure risk and mitigation of this increased risk with pharmacological seizure prophylaxis should be considered.</p>","PeriodicalId":15901,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HTR.0000000000000991","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) is emerging as a promising treatment for persons with disorder of consciousness (DoC) following traumatic brain injury (TBI). Clinically, however, there are concerns about rTMS exacerbating baseline seizure risk. To advance understanding of risks, this article reports evidence of DoC-TBI rTMS-related seizure risk.

Setting: Acute and sub-acute hospitals.

Participants: Persons in states of DoC 6.5 months to 15 years after TBI (n = 20) who received active rTMS (n = 17) or placebo rTMS (n = 3). After completing placebo procedures, placebo participants completed active rTMS procedures. These 3 participants are included in the active group.

Design: Meta-analysis of data from 3 clinical trials; 2 within-subject, 1 double blind randomized placebo-controlled. Each trial used the same rTMS protocol, provided at least 30 rTMS sessions, and delivered rTMS to the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex.

Main measures: During each study's rTMS treatment phase, seizure occurrences were compared between active and placebo groups using logistic regression. After stratifying active group by presence/absence of seizure occurrences, sub-groups were compared using contingency chi-square tests of independence and relative risk (RR) ratios.

Results: Two unique participants experienced seizures (1 active, 1 placebo). Post seizure, both participants returned to baseline neurobehavioral function. Both participants received antiepileptics during remaining rTMS sessions, which were completed without further seizures. rTMS-related seizure incidence rate is 59 per 1000 persons. Logistic regression revealed no difference in seizure occurrence by treatment condition (active vs placebo) or when examined with seizure risk factors (P > .1). Presence of ventriculoperitoneal shunt elevated seizure risk (RR = 2.0).

Conclusion: Collectively, findings indicate a low-likelihood that the specified rTMS protocol exacerbates baseline seizure rates in persons with DoC after TBI. In presence of VP shunts, however, rTMS likely elevates baseline seizure risk and mitigation of this increased risk with pharmacological seizure prophylaxis should be considered.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
严重脑外伤后意识障碍者使用经颅磁刺激恢复昏迷的相关癫痫发作风险。
目的:重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)正在成为治疗创伤性脑损伤(TBI)后意识障碍(DoC)患者的一种很有前途的疗法。但在临床上,有人担心经颅磁刺激会加剧基线癫痫发作风险。为了增进对风险的了解,本文报告了与DoC-TBI经颅磁刺激相关的癫痫发作风险证据:急性和亚急性医院:TBI后6.5个月至15年处于DoC状态的人(n = 20),他们接受了活性经颅磁刺激(n = 17)或安慰剂经颅磁刺激(n = 3)。在完成安慰剂程序后,安慰剂参与者又完成了主动经颅磁刺激程序。这 3 名参与者被纳入活性组:3项临床试验数据的元分析;2项受试者内试验,1项双盲随机安慰剂对照试验。每项试验均采用相同的经颅磁刺激方案,提供至少30次经颅磁刺激治疗,并将经颅磁刺激传递到背外侧前额叶皮层:在每项研究的经颅磁刺激治疗阶段,采用逻辑回归法比较活性组和安慰剂组的癫痫发作情况。根据是否出现癫痫发作对活性组进行分层后,使用或然性独立秩方检验和相对风险(RR)比对亚组进行比较:结果:两名参与者出现癫痫发作(1 名服用活性药物,1 名服用安慰剂)。癫痫发作后,两名参与者的神经行为功能均恢复至基线水平。两名参与者在剩余的经颅磁刺激疗程中均接受了抗癫痫药物治疗,疗程结束后未再出现癫痫发作。逻辑回归显示,不同治疗条件(活性药物与安慰剂)或与癫痫发作风险因素一起检查时,癫痫发作发生率没有差异(P > .1)。存在脑室腹腔分流术会增加癫痫发作风险(RR = 2.0):总之,研究结果表明,指定的经颅磁刺激方案加剧创伤性脑损伤后DoC患者基线癫痫发作率的可能性较低。但是,如果存在 VP 分流,经颅磁刺激可能会增加基线癫痫发作风险,因此应考虑使用药物预防性癫痫发作来降低增加的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
153
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation is a leading, peer-reviewed resource that provides up-to-date information on the clinical management and rehabilitation of persons with traumatic brain injuries. Six issues each year aspire to the vision of “knowledge informing care” and include a wide range of articles, topical issues, commentaries and special features. It is the official journal of the Brain Injury Association of America (BIAA).
期刊最新文献
Effects of Home Neighborhood Tree Canopy Coverage on Mental Health Outcomes: A Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems Investigation. Reciprocal Causation Among Pain, Physical Health, and Mental Health 1 Year Post-Traumatic Brain Injury: A Cross-Lagged Panel Model From the TRACK-TBI Study. Association of Frailty, Comorbidities and Muscularity With GOS and 30-Day Mortality After TBI in Elderly Patients-A Retrospective Study in 1104 Patients. Relationships Between Neighborhood Disadvantage, Race/Ethnicity, and Neurobehavioral Symptoms Among Veterans With Mild Traumatic Brain Injury. Cross-Lagged Associations Among Sleep, Headache, and Pain in Pediatric Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: An A-CAP Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1